<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2007/05/02/mail-110/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2007/05/02/mail-110/</link>
	<description>Watching the Daily Mail</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:38:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daily Mail readers ‘misunderstood’</title>
		<link>http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2007/05/02/mail-110/comment-page-1/#comment-138459</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily Mail readers ‘misunderstood’</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 13:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigdaddymerk.co.uk/mailwatchnew/?p=1756#comment-138459</guid>
		<description>[...] The Daily Mail is so fed up with people poking fun at its readers, it’s touring the UK’s public relations agencies in the hope they’ll put more advertorials (that is paid ‘editorial’ that proper PR people don’t dirty their hands with*) their way. The problem is that the advertising industry is beginning to question the quality of the Daily Mail’s readership, concerned that those who take its editorial seriously aren’t really the kind of people on which a marketing budget should be spent. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Daily Mail is so fed up with people poking fun at its readers, it’s touring the UK’s public relations agencies in the hope they’ll put more advertorials (that is paid ‘editorial’ that proper PR people don’t dirty their hands with*) their way. The problem is that the advertising industry is beginning to question the quality of the Daily Mail’s readership, concerned that those who take its editorial seriously aren’t really the kind of people on which a marketing budget should be spent. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTerry</title>
		<link>http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2007/05/02/mail-110/comment-page-1/#comment-138423</link>
		<dc:creator>CTerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 00:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigdaddymerk.co.uk/mailwatchnew/?p=1756#comment-138423</guid>
		<description>Hysteria? You mean like what we get from the Daily Mail everyday?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hysteria? You mean like what we get from the Daily Mail everyday?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

