“British Muslim gang?” Fantastic use of terminology there Mail. Instead of saying something like exstremists or fanatics, or fundamentalists, the Mail implies, for those that can’t make the difference, British Muslims.
I wouldn’t credit these assholes with the label.
Little John: He promised us news….we got Max Mosley.
Of course it has to be British Muslims, don’t you know they are all evil scheming terrorists at heart? even the ones who oppose terrorist acts?
Still, if they wish to be a good quality paper why don’t they report on ‘white British’ gangs (for criminal offenses) or ‘Christian terrorists’ (for attacks in America by Christian fundamentalists). Or is it a fact that has passed me easily by that only Muslims can be terrorists?
“Still, if they wish to be a good quality paper why don’t they report on ‘white British’ gangs (for criminal offenses) or ‘Christian terrorists’ (for attacks in America by Christian fundamentalists). Or is it a fact that has passed me easily by that only Muslims can be terrorists?”
Or that Bush was allegedly told to invade Iraq by God.
The Mail’s letter editor evidently enjoys exposing the limited knowledge of Mail readers – or perhaps it’s his/her limited knowledge. Today self-styled coin collector David Vale suggests that the Royal Mint must be “introducing the only currency in the world not to have its value in figures, only in words”. Evidently he has not come across the USA’s “one cent”, “five cents”, “one dime” and “one quarter”, all devoid of numbers!
“Were the IRA ever described as “British Christian”?
Maybe because they never claimed to be opertating in the name of Christiannity; whereas these guys specfically claimed Islam as the motivation for these plots so it is correct to refer their religon when describing them
A more specific form of Christian terrorism aside from the IRA would be the Christian milita killings in Lebanon in the 1980s and the recent abortion doctor murders/clinic attacks by fundamentalist Christians. Except these cases are rarely called Christian terrorism.
“British Muslim gang?” Fantastic use of terminology there Mail. Instead of saying something like exstremists or fanatics, or fundamentalists, the Mail implies, for those that can’t make the difference, British Muslims.
I wouldn’t credit these assholes with the label.
Little John: He promised us news….we got Max Mosley.
Of course it has to be British Muslims, don’t you know they are all evil scheming terrorists at heart? even the ones who oppose terrorist acts?
Still, if they wish to be a good quality paper why don’t they report on ‘white British’ gangs (for criminal offenses) or ‘Christian terrorists’ (for attacks in America by Christian fundamentalists). Or is it a fact that has passed me easily by that only Muslims can be terrorists?
Remember Ann Coulters famous line ‘not all Muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslim’? Clearly she has never heard of ‘The Troubles’
Promoting gambling?
The Police should be persecuting motorists and not catching normally law abiding terrorists.
Littlejohn – what a piece of crap !
Were the IRA ever described as “British Christian”?
“Still, if they wish to be a good quality paper why don’t they report on ‘white British’ gangs (for criminal offenses) or ‘Christian terrorists’ (for attacks in America by Christian fundamentalists). Or is it a fact that has passed me easily by that only Muslims can be terrorists?”
Or that Bush was allegedly told to invade Iraq by God.
Littledick’s back and talking out of his arse again. All is well with the Mail.
“Labour promised us a new Jerusalem” – That was in 1945, a decade scientists have been able to carbon-date Littlejohn’s views from.
The Mail’s letter editor evidently enjoys exposing the limited knowledge of Mail readers – or perhaps it’s his/her limited knowledge. Today self-styled coin collector David Vale suggests that the Royal Mint must be “introducing the only currency in the world not to have its value in figures, only in words”. Evidently he has not come across the USA’s “one cent”, “five cents”, “one dime” and “one quarter”, all devoid of numbers!
God, i’m quite happy we didn’t get a “New Jerusalem” Have you seen it on the news? People getting blown up, religious and racial hatred?
Nope, i’m quite happy with being in Little Britain, which is the English translation for Brittany, which is much lovlier place than Jerusalem.
‘Were the IRA ever described as “British Christian”?’
Well No because they weren’t British!
“Were the IRA ever described as “British Christian”?
Maybe because they never claimed to be opertating in the name of Christiannity; whereas these guys specfically claimed Islam as the motivation for these plots so it is correct to refer their religon when describing them
You can get a flight to Jerusalem from T5
When are you going?
A more specific form of Christian terrorism aside from the IRA would be the Christian milita killings in Lebanon in the 1980s and the recent abortion doctor murders/clinic attacks by fundamentalist Christians. Except these cases are rarely called Christian terrorism.
I very much doubt Labour ever promised a new Jerusalem.
They reported on this yesterday. Was there no Diana/McCann “news” to put on the front cover instead?