And here’s today’s latest uncalled for attack on the poor middle classes by evil Zanu-Labour, curtosy of the Daily Fail. As I’ve said before, according to this shit, the middle classes have it so rough under McBroon and the only solution would be to kill them all to put them out of their misery.
I would suggest that if the Daily Mail are unable to correctly spell a prominent politician’s name, they give up all pretence of being a ‘newspaper’ and re-register as a comic.
Cornation Street-the personification of the Church of England, is in trouble for not putting a cross on screen.
Jonny Ross has pissed them off for I don’t know, doing his job.
The Royals are in trouble for giving someone with dark skin a nickname, therefore making them the living embodiment of the Nazis.
And this pile of rubbish: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1114604/The-migrants-just-dont-belong-Archbishop-York.html
The mail have basically twisted the words of the Archbishop of York for their own grubby ends.
The Archbishop said this in his speech, in relation to lack of government dialouge,
“And, sadly that lack of trust has, too often, led to over-hasty responses to panic headlines on immigration and asylum, on crime, on safety, and to an impulse towards the creation of legislation rather than towards consultation and dialogue”
This ‘war on the middle classes’ is, in the Fail’s own words:
“[a] panel which will look at how children from poorer backgrounds can break into professions such as medicine, the law, the army and the media.”
Bastards! A scheme to get the great unwashed in to good jobs. Who’d have thought such a devious plot of social opportunity would ever be masterminded by some evil Labour politician.
Tosh. The legislation is designed to help those from poorer backgrounds by forcing Councils to act on social inequality. How does that ‘target’ middle classes. Its not Labour calling this a war its the Mail.
This headline is straight from the 1800s. Are there no workhouses!?!?!?
I didn’t even realise they were discussing Harriet Harman until I Googled “Harriet Harperson”. What are they doing using a tabloid nickname for a politician on the front page? It reads like Mad Magazine. Am I also the only one who sees the inherent irony in covering Prince Harry’s latest gaffe whilst simultaneously using a gendered and purposefully mocking nickname in their own headline article’s standfirst?
I wonder if the law was actually called “War on middle-classes”. As CTerry says the Mail lives in a strange world where Labour are crazy marxists who will arrest the middle classes for re-educating, but at the same time they accuse them of robbing the working classes (or scum as the Mail would probably prefer to call them). Its like the other side of their moon on a stick politics where they want massive NHS spending on literally millions of doctors and drugs (in order to have no waiting times or MRSA) but at the same time dont want any taxes to pay for it.
I think today, the Mail officially became a glossy magazine instead of a national newspaper. As ALloyd and Stevie H said, a serious newspaper does not call a politician by a tabloid nickame in a serious story. I could understand them calling her it if Harriet harMAN had passed a law or said someting which was extremley politically correct (Which is where the tabloids gave her her nickname), but not in a political story like this. Ignorant, thick dickheads!
And as Sarah pointed out, it is absolutly disgusting how they deliberatly altered what the archbishop of York said to make him look racist fuel their own vile fascist propaganda. They really are becoming more totalitarian everyday, using more and more effective methods of brainwashing their readers. If I was Mr Sentamu, I’d sue them for thousands for libel and deliberatly misleading the public over what I said.
hey kiz its should not be harman but halfman is how it should be described.the mail should write what it wants not what you want. its called free speach and their interpretation.CTeery if thats your best get off their back and in your sack. tcoho you dont even know how to spell ” tehy rlelay hvae sotpepd mkinag any aettmpt at ojbtcevie rperointg
Yeah, free speech that you Mail types don’t allow on your pathetic website by moderating all opposing comments. You have no right to accuse someone else of restricting free speech when you do exactly the same. Here’s an idea- instead of insulting all of us on here, why don’t you just piss off back to the DM comment boards where your opinions will be more welcome.
“I have to ask- are the Daily Mail / Express apologists on here real or is somebody having a laugh?”
It’s called being a troll. Best if they aren’t fed. They come and go on here and usually disappear after a while; usually when their mother confiscates their computer, or they get too much homework to do.
yes we are having a laugh you should try it sometime. hey george we go away when you lot just bore us. yes i do have a mother not a household engineer like you and y do u buy the mail anyway. mr mordon you must have nearly died of socratic irony when you wrote that ha ha
sales figures rise and fall but i dont give my money to the likes of the mirror and it is my money earned not paid out of my tax like public servant wages. why dont you just come and ask to borrow my paper nicely you will sae my money and i will not have to give you such a big pay hike
I love how all the comments on the “RACE ROW” story are saying how it’s PC gone mad, lunatics have taken over the asylum etc etc etc
But it’s THE MAIL who are running the story. Stop buying the paper if you’re so outraged. Somehow I’m not sure the Independent has given that item front page billing.
It’s got to the point where the reactions are so uniform that they don’t even change in response to different pieces of news . The Mail might as well be published as a collection of blank pieces of paper with some crayons. Mail readers can than draw on “Asylum Seeker Criminal Mustafa al-ihatethewesta paid £25,000p/a and given university education by local council in bid to stop him offending”, put the paper to one side, get themselves some cereal, pick up the paper and then choke on their cornflakes.
If anyone want’s to know where all these trolls may be coming from, I found this little beauty the other night. It’s an anti-mailwatch site where they constantly insult the work we do and think we’re idiots.
Basically a bunch of right-wing losers and pathetic DM readers who have nothinbg better to do with their time and think they’re cool to do it. Maybe we should go on there sometime and troll on it ourselves.
Ha i LOVE the reason its annoying at the top. Apparentl;y this site generalises while referring to its users as liberal lefties, and the generalisations are presumeably made on the Mails, er, generalisations. And apparently there should be a guardianwatch and independentwatch. I would suggest going to their websites where you can freely comment on what they print, a facility unavailable to those who who go on the Mails site. Oh and the usual drivel along the lines of ‘wah wah wah attacking the right wing’ completely missing the point of the site.
Labour is now attempting to win back the white poor, terrified that they’ll all vote BNP. What an indictment of our democracy that the indigenous poor have to start voting for the far-right in order to be noticed. The fate of the white underclass has been similar to that of the native Americans and the Australian aborigines, shoved onto reservations, i.e. estates on the edges of towns and cities, so as to make way for great waves of immigrants, most of whom are alien to this country in both ethnic and cultural terms. It’s amazing that far more of them haven’t fallen into the arms of the far-right.
What I notice on this site is the haughty, patrician attitude that so many of you adopt to the white poor, the kind of people who appear on the ‘Jeremy Kyle’ show. Left-wing snobbery is at work here I suspect. Well let me tell you, these people are your kith and kin (most of you anyway) and you are under an obligation to them, whether you like it or not.
How is it that as soon as I mention the site, they suddenly comment on here? I know it sounds like Mail-style paranoia, but the only way they could have found out that we know about them is if they’ve been constantly watching this site and waiting for one of us to mention them. To all the trolls from it, fuck off back to your own pathetic site
Daveyp personally believe in a fair and just society FOR ALL, whether they be immigrants, working class white “indigenous” (for want of a better word), unemployed, employed, retired etc etc. There should be no element of society that becomes forgotten about/swept under the carpet.
The likes of the Daily Mail/Daily Express, and I think it’s fair to say, the majority of its readership do not share this view. You simply have to look at some of the comments on it’s website to see that.
Last night I happened to catch an episode of Secret Millionaire. It was concerning a community in Salford Manchester. It was very sad how these people were sidelined into inescapable poverty and I was moved to tears by the way these people have been treated by society.
Under obligation to them? Don’t think so. I only serve myself as I’ve said before. Fact is that people who go on the JK show are scum, plain and simple. Not because they are poor but because they choose to discuss the fact that “he slept with her while he was still with me and now she’s pregnant but he says it ain’t his” on national tv and not in the privacy of their own homes. I wouldn’t describe myself as a snob; I hate twatish, rascist, easily influenced fucktards wheather they be poor, middle class or upper class. Makes no difference to me. I find it amazing that you compare the ‘plight’ of the ‘underclass’ – a lovely term which you, not I said (and we’re the snobs?) to Native Americans and Aborigines. Its not like immigrants are actually turfing hardworking people out of their houses onto the streets with nothing. They still have their ipods surely?
What I notice on this site is the haughty, patrician attitude that so many of you adopt to the white poor, the kind of people who appear on the ‘Jeremy Kyle’ show. Left-wing snobbery is at work here I suspect. Well let me tell you, these people are your kith and kin (most of you anyway) and you are under an obligation to them, whether you like it or
not.
Black British people aren’t my kin? I can’t speak for others but I’m certainly not a snob and I don’t know of any left wing papers that display the snobbery the Mail routinely prints (it isn’t spelled “com-pen-say-shun”). As someone who is on the left, I want to help the working class work and have nice lives. The recent piece printed in the Mail about the grievances of the white working class centred on the idea that BNP support came from jobless people who wanted to secure council housing with less competition. These people are normally referred to as “scroungers”. I don’t believe that we should encourage welfare dependency just because one is “indigenous” (how are we defining that by the way? Born to Polish parents but white? Born to British parents but black? My mother was Irish – am I less important than someone with two English parents?)
Has anybody seen the Amy Winehouse story the Daily Mail are covering – the photo is clearly a fake. She has no shadow, there is yellow on here elbow which is illogical with the yellow being cast.
It looks more like she is doing a yoga position or something & somebody has superimposed the photo on the background. Plus, if a famous person is crawling around the streets on their hands & knees – why is nobody looking at her?
It’s the same old isn’t it? You oppose anything the Mail says you’re a Commy, you support global warming, you eat tofu, you hate white people, you love muslim nutjobs.
Seriously, change the record. Just cus I’m liberal it does not mean I hate white people, it does not mean I support muslim exstremists, benefit fraud and that I think this country should be flooded with migrants. That’s the imagination of the some people who’ve flooded this page. What on earth gives you the idea people on the left have abandoned their own people (who apparently are only white?). That’s the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard. I accept that the working class of England in particular have felt very angry with Labour since they’ve moved to the centre. None of the parties have addressed problems that people have expressed about immigration and have become reactionary. Instead of calming those fears or challenging them they’ve ignored them. But how about a proper debate about immigration rather than a “they’ve taken all our jobs” crap.
Incidently, do any of the commenters on this site going on about the working class not understand how socialist they sound? YOU’RE the socialist/communist ones. Not us.
Also, I wouldn’t worry if some of these people don’t think we’re “indigenous”. They’ll just deport us all to a different country. At least it’ll be hot.
And here’s today’s latest uncalled for attack on the poor middle classes by evil Zanu-Labour, curtosy of the Daily Fail. As I’ve said before, according to this shit, the middle classes have it so rough under McBroon and the only solution would be to kill them all to put them out of their misery.
‘Harperson’ on the front page headline? Wtf?
Do the real-middle classes even read this tripe? I always thought it was read by the aspiring middle classes .
Oh, ho, ho, ho!! Side-splittingly funny! Harriet Harperson! Genius! Milk this ‘joke’ to death…
I would suggest that if the Daily Mail are unable to correctly spell a prominent politician’s name, they give up all pretence of being a ‘newspaper’ and re-register as a comic.
Has that fella in the period drama at the top borrowed Alistair darling’s eyebrows?
I love today’s Mail
Cornation Street-the personification of the Church of England, is in trouble for not putting a cross on screen.
Jonny Ross has pissed them off for I don’t know, doing his job.
The Royals are in trouble for giving someone with dark skin a nickname, therefore making them the living embodiment of the Nazis.
And this pile of rubbish:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1114604/The-migrants-just-dont-belong-Archbishop-York.html
The mail have basically twisted the words of the Archbishop of York for their own grubby ends.
Compare this: http://www.archbishopofyork.org/2126
With what the Mail has said.
The Archbishop said this in his speech, in relation to lack of government dialouge,
“And, sadly that lack of trust has, too often, led to over-hasty responses to panic headlines on immigration and asylum, on crime, on safety, and to an impulse towards the creation of legislation rather than towards consultation and dialogue”
They forgot to mention that bit.
This ‘war on the middle classes’ is, in the Fail’s own words:
“[a] panel which will look at how children from poorer backgrounds can break into professions such as medicine, the law, the army and the media.”
Bastards! A scheme to get the great unwashed in to good jobs. Who’d have thought such a devious plot of social opportunity would ever be masterminded by some evil Labour politician.
Tosh. The legislation is designed to help those from poorer backgrounds by forcing Councils to act on social inequality. How does that ‘target’ middle classes. Its not Labour calling this a war its the Mail.
This headline is straight from the 1800s. Are there no workhouses!?!?!?
I didn’t even realise they were discussing Harriet Harman until I Googled “Harriet Harperson”. What are they doing using a tabloid nickname for a politician on the front page? It reads like Mad Magazine. Am I also the only one who sees the inherent irony in covering Prince Harry’s latest gaffe whilst simultaneously using a gendered and purposefully mocking nickname in their own headline article’s standfirst?
When will they be calling in the airstrikes & daisy cutters than?
See rumours that the Evening Standard (DM Group) might be bought by a wealthy Russian – wish a wealthy Arab would buy the Wail. Wot a larf!
Cool! I’d like to offer my services in the war. I’ve always wanted to learn how to use a helicopter gunship.
They really have stopped making any attempt at objective reporting, haven’t they?
LABOUR FAIL’S TO HELP POOR PEOPLE FOR YEARS!
NOW THEY’RE DECLARING WAR ON THE MIDDLE CLASSES!!!
Uhh guys, how about you make up your fucking minds…
I wonder if the law was actually called “War on middle-classes”. As CTerry says the Mail lives in a strange world where Labour are crazy marxists who will arrest the middle classes for re-educating, but at the same time they accuse them of robbing the working classes (or scum as the Mail would probably prefer to call them). Its like the other side of their moon on a stick politics where they want massive NHS spending on literally millions of doctors and drugs (in order to have no waiting times or MRSA) but at the same time dont want any taxes to pay for it.
I think today, the Mail officially became a glossy magazine instead of a national newspaper. As ALloyd and Stevie H said, a serious newspaper does not call a politician by a tabloid nickame in a serious story. I could understand them calling her it if Harriet harMAN had passed a law or said someting which was extremley politically correct (Which is where the tabloids gave her her nickname), but not in a political story like this. Ignorant, thick dickheads!
And as Sarah pointed out, it is absolutly disgusting how they deliberatly altered what the archbishop of York said to make him look racist fuel their own vile fascist propaganda. They really are becoming more totalitarian everyday, using more and more effective methods of brainwashing their readers. If I was Mr Sentamu, I’d sue them for thousands for libel and deliberatly misleading the public over what I said.
hey kiz its should not be harman but halfman is how it should be described.the mail should write what it wants not what you want. its called free speach and their interpretation.CTeery if thats your best get off their back and in your sack. tcoho you dont even know how to spell ” tehy rlelay hvae sotpepd mkinag any aettmpt at ojbtcevie rperointg
Yeah, free speech that you Mail types don’t allow on your pathetic website by moderating all opposing comments. You have no right to accuse someone else of restricting free speech when you do exactly the same. Here’s an idea- instead of insulting all of us on here, why don’t you just piss off back to the DM comment boards where your opinions will be more welcome.
Scothmist wrote:
‘CTeery if thats your best get off their back and in your sack. tcoho you dont even know how to spell’
BANG! And there goes the irony bomb
I have to ask- are the Daily Mail / Express apologists on here real or is somebody having a laugh?
Having a laugh, I should think. Leastways, I fucking hope.
George.
“I have to ask- are the Daily Mail / Express apologists on here real or is somebody having a laugh?”
It’s called being a troll. Best if they aren’t fed. They come and go on here and usually disappear after a while; usually when their mother confiscates their computer, or they get too much homework to do.
yes we are having a laugh you should try it sometime. hey george we go away when you lot just bore us. yes i do have a mother not a household engineer like you and y do u buy the mail anyway. mr mordon you must have nearly died of socratic irony when you wrote that ha ha
I am please to report that their sales figures are falling as they get more and more desparate for healines. Their readership must be dying off.
sales figures rise and fall but i dont give my money to the likes of the mirror and it is my money earned not paid out of my tax like public servant wages. why dont you just come and ask to borrow my paper nicely you will sae my money and i will not have to give you such a big pay hike
‘Labour War’ – hoardes of expectant women about to give birth launching rocket attacks on Tarquins, Jocastas, and Yummy Mummies’ beloved 4×4s?
Filthy Nu-Labour scum want us to use full stops, other punctuation and readable sentence-structure.
@NJH – How dare they!
I love how all the comments on the “RACE ROW” story are saying how it’s PC gone mad, lunatics have taken over the asylum etc etc etc
But it’s THE MAIL who are running the story. Stop buying the paper if you’re so outraged. Somehow I’m not sure the Independent has given that item front page billing.
It’s got to the point where the reactions are so uniform that they don’t even change in response to different pieces of news . The Mail might as well be published as a collection of blank pieces of paper with some crayons. Mail readers can than draw on “Asylum Seeker Criminal Mustafa al-ihatethewesta paid £25,000p/a and given university education by local council in bid to stop him offending”, put the paper to one side, get themselves some cereal, pick up the paper and then choke on their cornflakes.
@ Dave
The standard response is “this is so typical….” without ever explaining how. And of course it then becomes a self-fulfiling prophecy.
If anyone want’s to know where all these trolls may be coming from, I found this little beauty the other night. It’s an anti-mailwatch site where they constantly insult the work we do and think we’re idiots.
http://www.dont-start-me-off.com/CelebInfo.php?celeb_id=1643
Basically a bunch of right-wing losers and pathetic DM readers who have nothinbg better to do with their time and think they’re cool to do it. Maybe we should go on there sometime and troll on it ourselves.
Come on and visit the site if you want. We’ll get the organic lentil and tofu soup warmed up for you.
I’ve seen this site before. They think we are all blanket wearing lesbians. Looks like it’s frequented by the mentally challenged.
I think I left my blanket in a rabbit hole.
Ha i LOVE the reason its annoying at the top. Apparentl;y this site generalises while referring to its users as liberal lefties, and the generalisations are presumeably made on the Mails, er, generalisations. And apparently there should be a guardianwatch and independentwatch. I would suggest going to their websites where you can freely comment on what they print, a facility unavailable to those who who go on the Mails site. Oh and the usual drivel along the lines of ‘wah wah wah attacking the right wing’ completely missing the point of the site.
Labour is now attempting to win back the white poor, terrified that they’ll all vote BNP. What an indictment of our democracy that the indigenous poor have to start voting for the far-right in order to be noticed. The fate of the white underclass has been similar to that of the native Americans and the Australian aborigines, shoved onto reservations, i.e. estates on the edges of towns and cities, so as to make way for great waves of immigrants, most of whom are alien to this country in both ethnic and cultural terms. It’s amazing that far more of them haven’t fallen into the arms of the far-right.
What I notice on this site is the haughty, patrician attitude that so many of you adopt to the white poor, the kind of people who appear on the ‘Jeremy Kyle’ show. Left-wing snobbery is at work here I suspect. Well let me tell you, these people are your kith and kin (most of you anyway) and you are under an obligation to them, whether you like it or not.
How is it that as soon as I mention the site, they suddenly comment on here? I know it sounds like Mail-style paranoia, but the only way they could have found out that we know about them is if they’ve been constantly watching this site and waiting for one of us to mention them. To all the trolls from it, fuck off back to your own pathetic site
and leave our peaceful one alone.
Daveyp personally believe in a fair and just society FOR ALL, whether they be immigrants, working class white “indigenous” (for want of a better word), unemployed, employed, retired etc etc. There should be no element of society that becomes forgotten about/swept under the carpet.
The likes of the Daily Mail/Daily Express, and I think it’s fair to say, the majority of its readership do not share this view. You simply have to look at some of the comments on it’s website to see that.
Last night I happened to catch an episode of Secret Millionaire. It was concerning a community in Salford Manchester. It was very sad how these people were sidelined into inescapable poverty and I was moved to tears by the way these people have been treated by society.
Above should read…. “Daveyp – I personally believe……..”
Under obligation to them? Don’t think so. I only serve myself as I’ve said before. Fact is that people who go on the JK show are scum, plain and simple. Not because they are poor but because they choose to discuss the fact that “he slept with her while he was still with me and now she’s pregnant but he says it ain’t his” on national tv and not in the privacy of their own homes. I wouldn’t describe myself as a snob; I hate twatish, rascist, easily influenced fucktards wheather they be poor, middle class or upper class. Makes no difference to me. I find it amazing that you compare the ‘plight’ of the ‘underclass’ – a lovely term which you, not I said (and we’re the snobs?) to Native Americans and Aborigines. Its not like immigrants are actually turfing hardworking people out of their houses onto the streets with nothing. They still have their ipods surely?
What I notice on this site is the haughty, patrician attitude that so many of you adopt to the white poor, the kind of people who appear on the ‘Jeremy Kyle’ show. Left-wing snobbery is at work here I suspect. Well let me tell you, these people are your kith and kin (most of you anyway) and you are under an obligation to them, whether you like it or
not.
Black British people aren’t my kin? I can’t speak for others but I’m certainly not a snob and I don’t know of any left wing papers that display the snobbery the Mail routinely prints (it isn’t spelled “com-pen-say-shun”). As someone who is on the left, I want to help the working class work and have nice lives. The recent piece printed in the Mail about the grievances of the white working class centred on the idea that BNP support came from jobless people who wanted to secure council housing with less competition. These people are normally referred to as “scroungers”. I don’t believe that we should encourage welfare dependency just because one is “indigenous” (how are we defining that by the way? Born to Polish parents but white? Born to British parents but black? My mother was Irish – am I less important than someone with two English parents?)
Have just visited the other site, in amongst the usual drivel, there are a few wise words there. Let’s not write them off yet!
Has anybody seen the Amy Winehouse story the Daily Mail are covering – the photo is clearly a fake. She has no shadow, there is yellow on here elbow which is illogical with the yellow being cast.
It looks more like she is doing a yoga position or something & somebody has superimposed the photo on the background. Plus, if a famous person is crawling around the streets on their hands & knees – why is nobody looking at her?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1116442/Back-old-routine-Winehouse-left-crawling-fours-begging-drinks.html#
I posted a comment saying this was a fake – no doubt they refused it.
It’s the same old isn’t it? You oppose anything the Mail says you’re a Commy, you support global warming, you eat tofu, you hate white people, you love muslim nutjobs.
Seriously, change the record. Just cus I’m liberal it does not mean I hate white people, it does not mean I support muslim exstremists, benefit fraud and that I think this country should be flooded with migrants. That’s the imagination of the some people who’ve flooded this page. What on earth gives you the idea people on the left have abandoned their own people (who apparently are only white?). That’s the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard. I accept that the working class of England in particular have felt very angry with Labour since they’ve moved to the centre. None of the parties have addressed problems that people have expressed about immigration and have become reactionary. Instead of calming those fears or challenging them they’ve ignored them. But how about a proper debate about immigration rather than a “they’ve taken all our jobs” crap.
Incidently, do any of the commenters on this site going on about the working class not understand how socialist they sound? YOU’RE the socialist/communist ones. Not us.
Also, I wouldn’t worry if some of these people don’t think we’re “indigenous”. They’ll just deport us all to a different country. At least it’ll be hot.