Comments on: Mail http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/03/30/mail-431/ Watching the Daily Mail Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:38:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 hourly 1 By: Mail Man http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/03/30/mail-431/comment-page-1/#comment-216335 Mail Man Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:39:57 +0000 http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/?p=3393#comment-216335 Quite right Chris. There is no 'porn' broadcast in the UK. Not by any sane definition of the term. In the UK the authorities only allow that weird 'soft porn' nonsense (as you say all the silly pouting & groans but nothing beyond boobs and bums). No, we're not having any of that business of real people seen to be enjoying actual sex, how dirty, filthy, corrupting blah blah blah. If that's the freaky attitudes of those supposedly educated and in charge it's little wonder we have a problem with some of the less well adjusted members of our society. S'funny how not one of our anti-sex crusading DM types can ever square the fact that the repressed UK has bigger sex crime numbers than the much more open EU states. No? Quite right Chris.

There is no ‘porn’ broadcast in the UK.

Not by any sane definition of the term.

In the UK the authorities only allow that weird ’soft porn’ nonsense (as you say all the silly pouting & groans but nothing beyond boobs and bums).

No, we’re not having any of that business of real people seen to be enjoying actual sex, how dirty, filthy, corrupting blah blah blah.

If that’s the freaky attitudes of those supposedly educated and in charge it’s little wonder we have a problem with some of the less well adjusted members of our society.

S’funny how not one of our anti-sex crusading DM types can ever square the fact that the repressed UK has bigger sex crime numbers than the much more open EU states.
No?

]]> By: ScottishLassie http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/03/30/mail-431/comment-page-1/#comment-216320 ScottishLassie Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:59:33 +0000 http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/?p=3393#comment-216320 A bit hypocritical really of the Mail to get outraged about expenses considering I know from a very reliable source (a colleague used to work for Daily Mail) that a lot of their staff in the 90's and early noughties used to claim for their drug habits on expenses!! A bit hypocritical really of the Mail to get outraged about expenses considering I know from a very reliable source (a colleague used to work for Daily Mail) that a lot of their staff in the 90’s and early noughties used to claim for their drug habits on expenses!!

]]>