=

Express

Posted by Merk

April 29th, 2009

e15271387

Categories: Express Watch, Front Pages |

15 Comments

  1. Sarah T

    Is it really responsible or appropriate to put a picture of a baby wearing a mask on the front page? It’s subtly insinuating that babies are all at risk and every parent must be frightened into strapping masks across the wee ones’ faces.

    Where did they even get that photo? It’s a white, Western baby, presumably; who’s already wearing masks in this part of the world that isn’t a doctor treating one of the cases? Because I haven’t seen any (IRL or on the news).

  2. Original Paul

    Only 32M masks what about the rest of us!

  3. johnnyh

    32 million immigrants to get face masks AND GUESS WHO’S PAYING?

  4. Moggie

    I’m under the impression that these masks are mainly to reduce the chance of you infecting someone else, not getting infected yourself. Though what they mainly achieve is give the wearer a false sense of immunity. Plus help to spread panic, of course. Shun the infected mask wearers!

  5. Rob

    The masks do precisely jack shit in protecting people. Viruses are small enogh to get through the holes or around the gaps at the edges. They are however great at looking scary and hyping the fear factor.

  6. Bisyss

    “The masks do precisely jack shit in protecting people. … They are however great at looking scary and hyping the fear factor.”
    And making you look like a member of Altern-8, of course.

  7. Sarah T

    I might start wearing a mask to work, maybe that’ll put people off wanting to buy ice creams.

  8. James M

    I’ve got a wee bit of a cough and I’m wearing a belt that my parents bought me in Mexico about 8 years ago. Do I have swine flu?

  9. Matt Hurst

    To be honest I prefer the ones we had in the great plague, those ones with massive noses.

  10. Hannah

    The government have said that the 32m masks are for health care professionals who could be in direct contact with people who are infectious, but of course mentioning that part wouldn’t be quite as attention grabbing now would it?

  11. NJH

    Priorities people, we could win a TV here.

  12. Chris I

    So WHO says the toll is not 152 but 7. But sod it when have the facts stopped the Express before?

    http://www.smh.com.au/world/only-7-swine-flu-deaths-not-152-says-who-20090429-aml1.html

  13. Moggie

    Has it been disinfected?

  14. ms morbo

    rob: “The masks do precisely jack shit in protecting people. Viruses are small enogh to get through the holes or around the gaps at the edges.”

    i remember watching a doc about the 1918 flu some time ago in which this issue came up, the medical expert they interviewed about it said that using a cloth mask to keep out the flu was like trying to keep dust of something by covering it in chicken wire.

  15. chris

    It’s going to be just like ‘28 days later’.

Leave a comment