<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/05/08/mail-452/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/05/08/mail-452/</link>
	<description>Watching the Daily Mail</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:38:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JohnD</title>
		<link>http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/05/08/mail-452/comment-page-1/#comment-217401</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 18:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/?p=3551#comment-217401</guid>
		<description>Yes, this newspaper is absolutely farcical.  

I leafed through a copy of this broadloid shitepaper on Thursday, and what a miserable experience it was.  A good two thirds of the content was banal human interest stories complete with enormous pictures.  There was even a two page spread of pictures of a woman wearing an assortment of large bras, because devious old M&amp;S were charging a little extra for this sort of foundation garment.  The bastards!

It being a Thursday, I didn&#039;t even have the added fun of that maniac Littlejohn&#039;s ramshackle column.  Richard, a word of advice: lay off the LSD and offal puddings, you deluded barmpot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, this newspaper is absolutely farcical.  </p>
<p>I leafed through a copy of this broadloid shitepaper on Thursday, and what a miserable experience it was.  A good two thirds of the content was banal human interest stories complete with enormous pictures.  There was even a two page spread of pictures of a woman wearing an assortment of large bras, because devious old M&amp;S were charging a little extra for this sort of foundation garment.  The bastards!</p>
<p>It being a Thursday, I didn&#8217;t even have the added fun of that maniac Littlejohn&#8217;s ramshackle column.  Richard, a word of advice: lay off the LSD and offal puddings, you deluded barmpot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fruitbat</title>
		<link>http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/05/08/mail-452/comment-page-1/#comment-217389</link>
		<dc:creator>Fruitbat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 01:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/?p=3551#comment-217389</guid>
		<description>madam sensible: thanks for insulting us without giving a reason why, presumably because you consider the reason to be as clear as day with no possibility of it being rebutted. Just like the Mail, in fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>madam sensible: thanks for insulting us without giving a reason why, presumably because you consider the reason to be as clear as day with no possibility of it being rebutted. Just like the Mail, in fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

