Also, *what* moat? That headline seems to suggest it’s the moat we all know about but I honestly don’t know what they’re referring to. Is this some common knowledge that I’ve somehow missed?
“Why Wills Said Sorry For “Boring” Birthday Card From The Queen”
That headline suggests that William apologised for the fact that the Queen sent him a “boring” birthday card. Surely either the Queen should apologise for such a thing or what they mean is that William called the card “boring” and subsequently said sorry in which case they need to hire someone who can write English properly.
Unless, due to some weird medieval protocol, if the Queen sends someone a crap card the apology for the card must come from the receiver.
Matty – Some old woman has been getting birthday cards from the Queen for the past few years due to her being Very Old. Apparently the Queen was wearing the same outfit in the photos of all of them, so she complained and the palace dispatched William to have a chat and apologise for Queenie being incapable of choosing different clothes.
Cameron’s a clever boy and has an excellent PR team to get the Mail on his side already (though they were bound to support him anyway the Tory loving gits)
Can I just say I have lots of respect to that old woman who sent a complaint letter to the Queen about her boring dress? Respect.
Sorry NJH, you’re wrong. That rule only applies to plurals, not to names. So Paris’s is correct.
Interesting news in the top right for those of us who can see the similarity between the Mail’s relationship with its readers and that of an abusive partner and the abused. Now they’re threatening to give their readers a fat lip!
Brainy women-sex- on the front page! how odd!
This looks more like the front page of a Celebrity LadyBrain-Rotter magazine (such as Heat) than that of the “Daily Newspaper of the Year”.
Is it Susan Boyle?………
“Gender Bender Chemicals”, brilliant Mailism.
Also, *what* moat? That headline seems to suggest it’s the moat we all know about but I honestly don’t know what they’re referring to. Is this some common knowledge that I’ve somehow missed?
“Why Wills Said Sorry For “Boring” Birthday Card From The Queen”
That headline suggests that William apologised for the fact that the Queen sent him a “boring” birthday card. Surely either the Queen should apologise for such a thing or what they mean is that William called the card “boring” and subsequently said sorry in which case they need to hire someone who can write English properly.
Unless, due to some weird medieval protocol, if the Queen sends someone a crap card the apology for the card must come from the receiver.
Matty – Some old woman has been getting birthday cards from the Queen for the past few years due to her being Very Old. Apparently the Queen was wearing the same outfit in the photos of all of them, so she complained and the palace dispatched William to have a chat and apologise for Queenie being incapable of choosing different clothes.
I don’t think Paris Hilton & David Cameron would go that well on a front page…
*That* moat!
“Payback time”: give them credit, that’s actually a pretty smart headline.
I’m fighting the urge to go “Yes. Because they get to have sex with ME.”
Cameron’s a clever boy and has an excellent PR team to get the Mail on his side already (though they were bound to support him anyway the Tory loving gits)
Can I just say I have lots of respect to that old woman who sent a complaint letter to the Queen about her boring dress? Respect.
Poor grammar there; if Hilton owns something it should be “Paris’ “, with only one ’s’, although I’ve got to admit all papers are guilty of this.
Maybe it’s Mr Cameron’s plan to clear some of the deadwood who hold on regardless in places like Bournemouth West.
‘Gender bender chemicals’? Lolwut?
Maybe we should ask Paris Hilton if brainy women have better sex?
@ NJH
You’re right, well spotted.
Tsk, they don’t learn anything in school twenty years ago.
Sex on the front page? I thought this was a family paper.
I’d like to complain about all the sex on the front page of the Daily Mail.
I keep getting newsprint on my arse.
Sorry NJH, you’re wrong. That rule only applies to plurals, not to names. So Paris’s is correct.
Interesting news in the top right for those of us who can see the similarity between the Mail’s relationship with its readers and that of an abusive partner and the abused. Now they’re threatening to give their readers a fat lip!
@NJH
For once the mail have it right.
You’d say “parisses new best pal,” not “paris new best pal.”
NJH – possessive with an s can be either Paris’ or Paris’s.
Wrong, you use “Paris’s” here because Paris is singular [solely in terms of language, and not in terms of good character].
Paris’s new best pal.
The twins’ new best pal.