=

Mail

Posted by Merk

August 25th, 2009

m15368147

Categories: Front Pages |

11 Comments

  1. hel

    maybe anne robinson is having plastic surgery because of the constant pressure on women to look good – which comes from, among many other things, the daily mail.

  2. Original Paul

    Thank God for foreign doctors.

  3. sarah

    Most would read this and think,” Aren’t our doctors lazy? Why can’t they work weekends and evenings? Aren’t foreign doctors hard working?”

    The Mail heard about this and thought, ” Foreigners can’t speak english!Foreigners are able to book flights on easyjet! Agh!”

  4. johnnyh

    The mail covered this in 2007:
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-425834/The-1-000-day-foreign-doctors-standing-GPs.html

  5. Stevie H

    Maybe the DM are criticising Anne Robinson simply because she was lauded yesterday in one of their rivals (the DE) as “the antidote to TV’s ageism”.

  6. Ken

    ANNNNNNDDDDDD let the Conspiracy Bandwagons roll…

  7. Dave

    Ban all foreign doctors! They’ve made a horrible mess of Anne Robinson! Of course, if Zanuliebore DID ban all foreign doctors the NHS would be in trouble, and the DM would be the first to blame Zanuliebore for the resulting mess.

  8. Fruitbat

    Alright! Did I not say just yesterday that Anne Robinson should try aging gracefully?

  9. NJH

    I know it’s not intended as such, but that headline could be interpreted as pro-immigration.

  10. matt_o_mac

    I Love how they write the real story and then sum it up with the most retarded of headlines.

    It’s like those old American movies when they used to say “The Aliens are Back and this time they want your wives…. Alien Aducters 4 the WIFE STEALERS”

  11. Antigherkin

    My colleague just told me she read in “the paper” (ie the Daily Mail) yesterday that instead of “proper” community service, kids who’ve committed a crime are going to be given driving lessons and various soft sentences. She’s using this to support the idea we bring back public birchings. I really want to find this article so I can track it to its source and show her what whichever report it refers to actually said, which I usually find to be the best reponse to lazy Mail readers who never question what they’re told. I can’t find anything about it on the Mail’s website though. Could anyone help me out with a link?

Leave a comment