<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Now the Mail WANTS wife-beating lessons for children as young as five</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/09/02/mail-wife-beating-lessons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/09/02/mail-wife-beating-lessons/</link>
	<description>Watching the Daily Mail</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:39:10 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aldo</title>
		<link>http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/09/02/mail-wife-beating-lessons/comment-page-1/#comment-225827</link>
		<dc:creator>Aldo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/?p=3941#comment-225827</guid>
		<description>I think you lot have an unhealthy obsession with the daily mail. Whatever you might think about it, it has been around for donkeys&#039; years and will still be around long after this little hate site vanishes from view. Get a life! Buy the guardian or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you lot have an unhealthy obsession with the daily mail. Whatever you might think about it, it has been around for donkeys&#8217; years and will still be around long after this little hate site vanishes from view. Get a life! Buy the guardian or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/09/02/mail-wife-beating-lessons/comment-page-1/#comment-221181</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/?p=3941#comment-221181</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know how they got away with that piece in August. But I think the complaints must have soured as I remember it went down off the main page almost as soon as it was written, along with some &#039;feminist- friendly&#039; articles magically appearing. They&#039;d condemned a film for being light- heartedly misogynist - LOL, the DM doesn&#039;t even do misogyny &#039;light&#039;. What fecking morons :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know how they got away with that piece in August. But I think the complaints must have soured as I remember it went down off the main page almost as soon as it was written, along with some &#8216;feminist- friendly&#8217; articles magically appearing. They&#8217;d condemned a film for being light- heartedly misogynist &#8211; LOL, the DM doesn&#8217;t even do misogyny &#8216;light&#8217;. What fecking morons <img src='http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
