“Chaos over…” == “We’re going to create a huge fuss over an isolated incident caused by something we disagree with for hilariously outdated moral reasons”
Probably more people (with underlying conditions) die straight after drinking a cup of tea. But I look in vain for “Those tea dangers: why did labour not tell us?” headlines.
I noticed a few people clucking “prevention is better than cure!” with regards to cervical cancer, thinking that if teenagers are “encouraged” or “persuaded” to remain celebate en-mass then we can, hey, fix things without the jab.
It’s amazing that conservatives continue to regard themselves as somehow hard-headed and realistic and then, at the drop of a hat, come out with something as soft-headed and mindlessly idealistic as “hey, if everyone would just stop doing this thing they’ve been doing for years there wouldn’t be all these problems!”. All that separates this from the worst sort of hippy bullshit is the lack of “maaaan” at the end and the haze of spliff smoke.
Teenagers are going to keep having sex, it’s not possible to stop them. The best way of protecting them from the unwanted side effects is to give them condoms, and birth controls pills, and anti-cancer jags. That’s the real world.
Aside for the main headline, I see that they are yet again pushing the line that women should stay at home and raise children. Still stuck in the 1950s aren’t they?
Let me guess.. the article isn’t a blank page ‘NO!’ in the middle of it. Instead it’s a diatribe about how in the ‘good old days’ women stayed at home, cleaned house and produced babies.
As the child of two working parents, who has yet to fall ill bar the occasional sniffles since the age of twelve, and who was one of the healthier and more active children in my school… No, they aren’t. Even if there is some sort of correlation between the two, blindly insinating that the two are intrinsically linked is utter bullshit, especially when it is just to add fuel to their ‘grr, working mums’ line.
I was watching the news last night and mentally ticking off the stories that I knew for certain would be featured and distorted in today’s Mail. Jab scare (tick), working mums (tick) and something nasty about Mandleson (tick).
Turns out she died of advanced undiagnosed cancer in her chest.
Of course they will probably continue saying “girl died after receiving the vaccine”, which after all isn’t technically lying, even though she also “died after learning about Shakespeare and eating bread.”
What? Because of your papers scare mongering, which has just been proved to be completely wrong.
Well done!
I thought the girl had other health issues which resulted in her death?
She did.
MMR all over again.
“Chaos over…” == “We’re going to create a huge fuss over an isolated incident caused by something we disagree with for hilariously outdated moral reasons”
Probably more people (with underlying conditions) die straight after drinking a cup of tea. But I look in vain for “Those tea dangers: why did labour not tell us?” headlines.
Daily Mail creates Cancer Jab Chaos Loop all by itself.
Typical!
I noticed a few people clucking “prevention is better than cure!” with regards to cervical cancer, thinking that if teenagers are “encouraged” or “persuaded” to remain celebate en-mass then we can, hey, fix things without the jab.
It’s amazing that conservatives continue to regard themselves as somehow hard-headed and realistic and then, at the drop of a hat, come out with something as soft-headed and mindlessly idealistic as “hey, if everyone would just stop doing this thing they’ve been doing for years there wouldn’t be all these problems!”. All that separates this from the worst sort of hippy bullshit is the lack of “maaaan” at the end and the haze of spliff smoke.
Teenagers are going to keep having sex, it’s not possible to stop them. The best way of protecting them from the unwanted side effects is to give them condoms, and birth controls pills, and anti-cancer jags. That’s the real world.
“Secrets of Mandy’s 21K watch!”
That’s right, an article about a fucking wristwatch.
Why aren’t I beating a path to my newsagents already?
Aside for the main headline, I see that they are yet again pushing the line that women should stay at home and raise children. Still stuck in the 1950s aren’t they?
‘Are working mums children less healthy?’
Let me guess.. the article isn’t a blank page ‘NO!’ in the middle of it. Instead it’s a diatribe about how in the ‘good old days’ women stayed at home, cleaned house and produced babies.
“The Great Debate: Are Working Mums Children Less Healthy?”
Who’s ‘great debate’ is this exactly? I don’t come across many people desperate to debate this incredibly pressing issue.
I’m just amazed that they’re letting anyone say anything positive about Brown. Even his wife. Going soft on us, Mail?
As the child of two working parents, who has yet to fall ill bar the occasional sniffles since the age of twelve, and who was one of the healthier and more active children in my school… No, they aren’t. Even if there is some sort of correlation between the two, blindly insinating that the two are intrinsically linked is utter bullshit, especially when it is just to add fuel to their ‘grr, working mums’ line.
What’s “Secret” about Mandy’s watch? Does it shoot laser beams or something?
I was watching the news last night and mentally ticking off the stories that I knew for certain would be featured and distorted in today’s Mail. Jab scare (tick), working mums (tick) and something nasty about Mandleson (tick).
Yesterday, you know, when this was actually, like, news, it was only featured on page seven.
I bet you’ll be able to own Peter Mandleson’s watch tomorrow………..Is the working mum comment aimed at Sarah Brown?
Now there’s a surprise! The Mail stirring up panic and ‘CHAOS’. I wondered how long it would be before a story like this appeared.
Sarah brown is looking a bit blonder than usual.
Has she recently become dead in order to qualify for the front page slot?
Turns out she died of advanced undiagnosed cancer in her chest.
Of course they will probably continue saying “girl died after receiving the vaccine”, which after all isn’t technically lying, even though she also “died after learning about Shakespeare and eating bread.”