<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MailOnline&#8217;s toxic comments, part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/11/02/mailonline-comments-toxic-brands-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/11/02/mailonline-comments-toxic-brands-ii/</link>
	<description>Watching the Daily Mail</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:38:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/11/02/mailonline-comments-toxic-brands-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-228494</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/?p=4181#comment-228494</guid>
		<description>I sometimes comment on the Mail comments board, although less and less as I find that the moderation process is very odd,  for instance, I would write a sensible comment about a certain story, giving evidence to back up my claims and refuting the nonsense of other comments, and it wouldn&#039;t get posted, whereas some absolute nutter would rant about &#039;Mr Brown and the Stasi cultural marxist climate loonies&#039; on something unrelated to Brown, climate change or the percieved Stasi-esque qualities of Nu-lie-bore&#039; (perhaps Crufts or the return of Sooty) and have their comment allowed.

Lunacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sometimes comment on the Mail comments board, although less and less as I find that the moderation process is very odd,  for instance, I would write a sensible comment about a certain story, giving evidence to back up my claims and refuting the nonsense of other comments, and it wouldn&#8217;t get posted, whereas some absolute nutter would rant about &#8216;Mr Brown and the Stasi cultural marxist climate loonies&#8217; on something unrelated to Brown, climate change or the percieved Stasi-esque qualities of Nu-lie-bore&#8217; (perhaps Crufts or the return of Sooty) and have their comment allowed.</p>
<p>Lunacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: santosh</title>
		<link>http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/11/02/mailonline-comments-toxic-brands-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-224251</link>
		<dc:creator>santosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/?p=4181#comment-224251</guid>
		<description>mail regularly refuses to publish any of my sensible comments...apart from crucifying anything non white and non christian and sucking up to cheryl cole and katy perry it does little else..besides the amount of racis homophobic filth that is in the forums(the articles are like hooks intended to bait those comments) is disgusting...this is NOT freedom of expression its madness and needs to be censored.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mail regularly refuses to publish any of my sensible comments&#8230;apart from crucifying anything non white and non christian and sucking up to cheryl cole and katy perry it does little else..besides the amount of racis homophobic filth that is in the forums(the articles are like hooks intended to bait those comments) is disgusting&#8230;this is NOT freedom of expression its madness and needs to be censored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

