<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/11/04/mail-533/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/11/04/mail-533/</link>
	<description>Watching the Daily Mail</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:38:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gav</title>
		<link>http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/11/04/mail-533/comment-page-1/#comment-222879</link>
		<dc:creator>Gav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/?p=4212#comment-222879</guid>
		<description>Thanks Stu - nice to see another example of the Mail&#039;s  hypocritical amnesia! You are dead right, the comments from the readers about the recent story show that the real reason for negative responses is because the article mentions racism. This is of course not allowed to be discussed as it clearly is not a problem in Britain today, at all, (if you read the Mail/Express/Star etc).
James - definitely! Now up to 220+ red arrows of outrage!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Stu &#8211; nice to see another example of the Mail&#8217;s  hypocritical amnesia! You are dead right, the comments from the readers about the recent story show that the real reason for negative responses is because the article mentions racism. This is of course not allowed to be discussed as it clearly is not a problem in Britain today, at all, (if you read the Mail/Express/Star etc).<br />
James &#8211; definitely! Now up to 220+ red arrows of outrage!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom (iow)</title>
		<link>http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/11/04/mail-533/comment-page-1/#comment-222751</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom (iow)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/?p=4212#comment-222751</guid>
		<description>House-flipping MPs are also, presumably, cracking down on benefit fraud. Any objection from Allison to that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House-flipping MPs are also, presumably, cracking down on benefit fraud. Any objection from Allison to that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

