Comments on: Mail http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/11/10/mail-537/ Watching the Daily Mail Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:38:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 hourly 1 By: Billy http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/11/10/mail-537/comment-page-1/#comment-222941 Billy Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:16:05 +0000 http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/?p=4236#comment-222941 "Isn’t the Guardian just the liberal version of the Daily Mail?" No, that's the Independent. “Isn’t the Guardian just the liberal version of the Daily Mail?”

No, that’s the Independent.

]]> By: MatthewS http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/11/10/mail-537/comment-page-1/#comment-222938 MatthewS Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:11:25 +0000 http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/?p=4236#comment-222938 On the religion issue maybe it is, but I dont believe its liberal bias is as great as many suppose. The news stories are always very balanced and impartial, and it is only when you get to the comment aspects that the left-wing ness comes out, and even then it is generally well researched and articulate, unlike the mail which is just knee jerk steriotypes and no actual facts at all. In short you can disagree with the conclusion in the Guardian but not the news and research. They have also broken some brilliant stories, such as the guy killed by police during the G20 protests. On the religion issue maybe it is, but I dont believe its liberal bias is as great as many suppose. The news stories are always very balanced and impartial, and it is only when you get to the comment aspects that the left-wing ness comes out, and even then it is generally well researched and articulate, unlike the mail which is just knee jerk steriotypes and no actual facts at all. In short you can disagree with the conclusion in the Guardian but not the news and research. They have also broken some brilliant stories, such as the guy killed by police during the G20 protests.

]]>