<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/12/09/mail-557/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/12/09/mail-557/</link>
	<description>Watching the Daily Mail</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:39:10 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/12/09/mail-557/comment-page-1/#comment-224069</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/?p=4400#comment-224069</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wasn’t Germany referred to as ‘the sick man of Europe’ in the 1930’s, not long before a certain moustach wearing c*** came to power?&quot;

Hitler also blamed global recession (wall street crash), and Germany&#039;s awful economy on a combination of immmigrants, migrants, and Germany&#039;s &quot;liberal&quot; policies.

The politics of fear my friend. Right wing parties always get in when things have gone &quot;tits up&quot; on the global scale.

They simply hijack it, and blame it on freedom, liberalism, and foreigners.

They transfer global problems to national politics, and then declare their hardline stance as the answer.

it&#039;s quite cynical. Mail, Sun, Cameron, Osborne have been doing it for 2 years</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wasn’t Germany referred to as ‘the sick man of Europe’ in the 1930’s, not long before a certain moustach wearing c*** came to power?&#8221;</p>
<p>Hitler also blamed global recession (wall street crash), and Germany&#8217;s awful economy on a combination of immmigrants, migrants, and Germany&#8217;s &#8220;liberal&#8221; policies.</p>
<p>The politics of fear my friend. Right wing parties always get in when things have gone &#8220;tits up&#8221; on the global scale.</p>
<p>They simply hijack it, and blame it on freedom, liberalism, and foreigners.</p>
<p>They transfer global problems to national politics, and then declare their hardline stance as the answer.</p>
<p>it&#8217;s quite cynical. Mail, Sun, Cameron, Osborne have been doing it for 2 years</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/12/09/mail-557/comment-page-1/#comment-224068</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/?p=4400#comment-224068</guid>
		<description>&quot;I notice, BTW, that you can’t comment on the headline story on the Mail website. Is that because they don’t want to be snowed under with comments pointing out that they’ve grossly misrepresented the stats? I wonder.&quot;


A little ditty how The SUN Printing works...........

They publish a purposefully misleading headline. They then put the fact (telling a different story) on the inside cover - as in page 2. A page, funnily, that people just don&#039;t look at. One of the mysteries of the human brain. We just don&#039;t pay attention to left hand side pages.

To seal the deal even more, they will then publish a picture of a topless teenager on the opposite page, to make sure you aren&#039;t tempted to have a read at the actual headline story.

That&#039;s the whole point of page 3. To make sure you don&#039;t read page 2. Which is generally where they publish their &quot;facts&quot;. 

So, print fake headline. Put real story on page 2. Topless girl on 3. Everyone believes the headline.

Same principle with Mail. They&#039;ll put the actual fact on page 2, and some attention grabbing story on 3 so you don&#039;t bother reading it.

Publishing is completely cynical, working in it. You wouldn&#039;t believe the thought that goes into it all</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I notice, BTW, that you can’t comment on the headline story on the Mail website. Is that because they don’t want to be snowed under with comments pointing out that they’ve grossly misrepresented the stats? I wonder.&#8221;</p>
<p>A little ditty how The SUN Printing works&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>They publish a purposefully misleading headline. They then put the fact (telling a different story) on the inside cover &#8211; as in page 2. A page, funnily, that people just don&#8217;t look at. One of the mysteries of the human brain. We just don&#8217;t pay attention to left hand side pages.</p>
<p>To seal the deal even more, they will then publish a picture of a topless teenager on the opposite page, to make sure you aren&#8217;t tempted to have a read at the actual headline story.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the whole point of page 3. To make sure you don&#8217;t read page 2. Which is generally where they publish their &#8220;facts&#8221;. </p>
<p>So, print fake headline. Put real story on page 2. Topless girl on 3. Everyone believes the headline.</p>
<p>Same principle with Mail. They&#8217;ll put the actual fact on page 2, and some attention grabbing story on 3 so you don&#8217;t bother reading it.</p>
<p>Publishing is completely cynical, working in it. You wouldn&#8217;t believe the thought that goes into it all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
