Q. Since when did the Express take its lead from the Russians?
A. Since those nasty god hating Bolsheviks were replaced by those nice gas salesmen.
Q. “Our” scientists? I thought scientists were the bad guys, like those climate guys and the swiss death machine jockeys.
A. There are a few who are ours, usually climate sceptics, irrelevent design advocates etc, not to mention Barnes Wallis. We’re also partial to adopting the successful ones (Werner von Braun, Gillian McKeith, Doctor Evil and now that Cancer chappie).
Foe a similar approach see Gurkhas.
Q. What happened to the dead blonde?
A. Bit wasted after the christmas party, best we could manage was a cadaverous ginger.
Q. 8 inches.
A. Yes, Mrs. editor insists on nothing less from her weathermen.
Nice to see the Dirty Express siding with the Russians.
Is that ‘our’ scientists as in ‘our’ boys? I didn’t think the science community worked like that.
Maybe they’re trying to be divisive to scientists in the same way they do to the police. If an Express reader ever met a scientist who puts forward the case for climate change, their response simply has to be, “shouldn’t you be busy doing the REAL science like curin’ cancer?”.
Well.. it’s AFAIK one guy, and he’s pointing out that the data could easily be interpreted in another way – which is the basis of proper scientific debate (something the express wouldn’t know it it hit it in the face). Nobody has accused anyone of lying.
What we need now is for a Muslim scientist in Saudi Arabia to attack ‘the global warming myth’. That will cause a few heads to explode in Express land.
Russians eh!
Q. Since when did the Express take its lead from the Russians?
A. Since those nasty god hating Bolsheviks were replaced by those nice gas salesmen.
Q. “Our” scientists? I thought scientists were the bad guys, like those climate guys and the swiss death machine jockeys.
A. There are a few who are ours, usually climate sceptics, irrelevent design advocates etc, not to mention Barnes Wallis. We’re also partial to adopting the successful ones (Werner von Braun, Gillian McKeith, Doctor Evil and now that Cancer chappie).
Foe a similar approach see Gurkhas.
Q. What happened to the dead blonde?
A. Bit wasted after the christmas party, best we could manage was a cadaverous ginger.
Q. 8 inches.
A. Yes, Mrs. editor insists on nothing less from her weathermen.
Nice to see the Dirty Express siding with the Russians.
Is that ‘our’ scientists as in ‘our’ boys? I didn’t think the science community worked like that.
Maybe they’re trying to be divisive to scientists in the same way they do to the police. If an Express reader ever met a scientist who puts forward the case for climate change, their response simply has to be, “shouldn’t you be busy doing the REAL science like curin’ cancer?”.
I read somewhere that there is a lot of oil and gas in Russia
Well.. it’s AFAIK one guy, and he’s pointing out that the data could easily be interpreted in another way – which is the basis of proper scientific debate (something the express wouldn’t know it it hit it in the face). Nobody has accused anyone of lying.
Soon to be known as ‘Voice of The Kremlin’ eh?
What we need now is for a Muslim scientist in Saudi Arabia to attack ‘the global warming myth’. That will cause a few heads to explode in Express land.
I know that this will come as a shock, but the Express is talking a load of rubbish http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2009/12/russian_analysis_confirms_20th.php