=

Mail

Posted by sim-o

January 26th, 2010

m15535639

Categories: Front Pages |

10 Comments

  1. Stevie H

    For once I agree with the Daily Mail’s stance on this story.

    Not sure about the way they’ve reported it though…

  2. Original Paul

    Assisting a suicide is actually against the law, so it is for the Court to decide NOT some wordsmith at the Mail.

  3. Pope

    Wait, the Mail is in favour of Assisted Suicide now? I thought they were well against it.

    It’s a welcome revelation anyway.

  4. Matthew

    That’s another rhetorical question at the top of the page yes?

  5. Greg the baker

    She committed a crime, that’s why. The Courts will make judgement based on the evidence submitted.
    Not the Mail!

  6. Mail Reader

    Absolutely disgusting. As a regular reader of the Mail I am buying the Express more and more due to the Mails embrace of the culture of death, and weaker stance on immigration.

  7. Ken

    Embracing the culture of death vs embracing the culture of brain-death, then. Decisions, decisions.

  8. Joe K

    “Assisting a suicide is actually against the law, so it is for the Court to decide NOT some wordsmith at the Mail.”

    To be fair, it was a quote from the trial judge. She’d confessed to assissted suicide but the CPS persued a charge of attempted murder (not that the judge’s question automatically makes them wrong).

    I still don’t give much credit to the Mail – a stopped clock… and all that.

  9. Fruitbat

    Are they fucking kidding? She killed someone whatever way you look at it, and that gets decided in a court of law, not by John Q. Fuzz. Whatever the verdict, whatever the justification, death is hardly a minor offence that can be brushed aside.

  10. David C

    Maybe she reads the Mail

    That’s a tria f or anyone.

Leave a comment