Watching the Daily Mail
Posted by sim-o
January 27th, 2010
Categories: Front Pages |
except that she didn’t kill her daughter.
she was acquitted.
ah well, when did facts ever bother them …..
Helen Mirren doesn’t need to look in the Mirror, there’s a picture of herself in the Mail!
And The Express, lucky girl…………
except that she did kill her daughter.
somebody needs to check a dictionary
it’s not the Mail that needs to check its facts (not in this instance anyway)
As I understand it – and I’m quite happy to be corrected (unlike the Mail) – she admitted helping her daughter to commit suicide, but was acquitted of murder.
The law does not recognise assisting a suicide, it is a criminal matter.
It should be a criminal offence for Ms Pearson to pick up her pen.
So now the Mail is in favour of euthanasia?
Name (required)
Mail (will not be published) (required)
Website
Click for front page discussion
Home
Front Pages
Mailwatch Forum
- bigdaddymerk :: @ - Adam Bienkov :: @ - Chris Coltrane :: @ - D-Notice :: @ - Daily Quail :: @ - Dave Cross :: @ - Kate Griffin :: @ - Daniel Hoffmann-Gill :: @ - Tim Ireland :: @ - MacGuffin :: @ - Hannah Mudge :: @ - Carl P :: @ - Nadia Saint :: @ - septicisle :: - Sim-O :: @ - Uponnothing :: @
except that she didn’t kill her daughter.
she was acquitted.
ah well, when did facts ever bother them …..
Helen Mirren doesn’t need to look in the Mirror, there’s a picture of herself in the Mail!
And The Express, lucky girl…………
except that she did kill her daughter.
somebody needs to check a dictionary
it’s not the Mail that needs to check its facts (not in this instance anyway)
As I understand it – and I’m quite happy to be corrected (unlike the Mail) – she admitted helping her daughter to commit suicide, but was acquitted of murder.
The law does not recognise assisting a suicide, it is a criminal matter.
It should be a criminal offence for Ms Pearson to pick up her pen.
So now the Mail is in favour of euthanasia?