<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2010/02/10/mail-601/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2010/02/10/mail-601/</link>
	<description>Watching the Daily Mail</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:39:10 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2010/02/10/mail-601/comment-page-1/#comment-226779</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/?p=4693#comment-226779</guid>
		<description>karlo
No, I was being slightly sarcastic there. Obviously the Mail wouldn&#039;t make a shock-horror headline out of themselves the way they would about one of their bogey men.
MAIL REVENUES PLUNGE 12%
SUPPORT FOR LABOUR PLUNGES 12%
Similar sort of headline, but only one would be suitable for the Mail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>karlo<br />
No, I was being slightly sarcastic there. Obviously the Mail wouldn&#8217;t make a shock-horror headline out of themselves the way they would about one of their bogey men.<br />
MAIL REVENUES PLUNGE 12%<br />
SUPPORT FOR LABOUR PLUNGES 12%<br />
Similar sort of headline, but only one would be suitable for the Mail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karlo</title>
		<link>http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2010/02/10/mail-601/comment-page-1/#comment-226776</link>
		<dc:creator>karlo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/?p=4693#comment-226776</guid>
		<description>er Phil

I&#039;m assuming you know the Express story relates to an interim management report from DMGT - not exactly the stuff of tabloid  headlines. I&#039;m fairly sure that Mail readers (and, after all, I am one) aren&#039;t buying the paper for it&#039;s coverage of the financial markets.

I&#039;m also assuming you know that the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday increased their market share over the past three months - and that the 12% revenue fall does not take into account the closure of London Lite and the sale of the Evening Standard and therefore does not give an accurate picture.

Oh and shares were down 3.5p on the day.  Hold the front page...not</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>er Phil</p>
<p>I&#8217;m assuming you know the Express story relates to an interim management report from DMGT &#8211; not exactly the stuff of tabloid  headlines. I&#8217;m fairly sure that Mail readers (and, after all, I am one) aren&#8217;t buying the paper for it&#8217;s coverage of the financial markets.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also assuming you know that the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday increased their market share over the past three months &#8211; and that the 12% revenue fall does not take into account the closure of London Lite and the sale of the Evening Standard and therefore does not give an accurate picture.</p>
<p>Oh and shares were down 3.5p on the day.  Hold the front page&#8230;not</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
