Comments on: Mail http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2010/03/12/mail-624/ Watching the Daily Mail Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:38:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 hourly 1 By: Chris http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2010/03/12/mail-624/comment-page-1/#comment-227971 Chris Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:41:31 +0000 http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/?p=4839#comment-227971 Cameron and Osborne are borderline "thieves" if you ask me. They only got away with it as they didn't run a hard line on the mortgage interest cheats. Cameron was claiming £23k a year mortgage interest a year, for nearly a decade. He was taking out tax payer discounted mortgages, and then using the money to pay off mortgages on private properties. He paid off the mortgage to his own home, in full, within 6 months of taking out a £800k tax payer mortgage Cameron and Osborne are borderline “thieves” if you ask me. They only got away with it as they didn’t run a hard line on the mortgage interest cheats.

Cameron was claiming £23k a year mortgage interest a year, for nearly a decade.

He was taking out tax payer discounted mortgages, and then using the money to pay off mortgages on private properties.

He paid off the mortgage to his own home, in full, within 6 months of taking out a £800k tax payer mortgage

]]> By: Chris http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2010/03/12/mail-624/comment-page-1/#comment-227970 Chris Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:38:45 +0000 http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/?p=4839#comment-227970 Karlo Do you work for this tawdry rag? Or is it just blind faith! I have no comment about allegations of fraud. I have comment about this disgusting piece of filth, labelling defendents "thieves" before they have even stood trial, just because they work for a rival party, along with photos of the 3. And most importantly, choosing to not put a picture of the tory party peer, who is standing trial for the exact same crime?! They don't mention the tory at all on the headline. They only mention him in page 6! Even you must admit what a cynical, dishonest piece of filth this article is? Karlo

Do you work for this tawdry rag? Or is it just blind faith!

I have no comment about allegations of fraud.

I have comment about this disgusting piece of filth, labelling defendents “thieves” before they have even stood trial, just because they work for a rival party, along with photos of the 3.

And most importantly, choosing to not put a picture of the tory party peer, who is standing trial for the exact same crime?!

They don’t mention the tory at all on the headline. They only mention him in page 6!

Even you must admit what a cynical, dishonest piece of filth this article is?

]]>