er.. this NICE organisation. Would that be the same NICE which the Court of Appeal found to have acted unlawfully and unfairly in its appraisal of the drug Aricept ?
Or would it be the same NICE forced into such embarassing u-turns ove the drugs Sutent (mentioned in the NICE letter) and Lucentis?
Or even the NICE so regularly cricitsed by doctors and charities over the time taken to reach decisions, the arbitrary nature of the criteria used and the lack of transparency in its decision making process.
Perhaps, but when drug companies push out drugs that prove to have harmful effects the Mail is the first to get upset: “Heart attacks and suicides… yet the dangers were all kept so quiet. So how CAN you trust your medicine?” http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1033132/Side-effects-include-suicide-heart-attacks-So-prescribed-drugs.html . The Mail’s simplistic line that any doctor should be free to prescribe any drug regardless of cost would be like giving drug companies a licence to print money.
“Instead she unveiled a rather unsightly problem on her left foot – her little toe and fourth toe crossed over one another.
She has been placed in direct competition with David Cameron’s wife Samantha, and this will do little to boost her credential’s against ‘SamCam’.” Jesus, people actually bother trying to justify this rag’s existence?
“Why do people feel it necessary to put their every random thought on the World Wide Web? It’s a sort of technological Tourette’s. And why does anyone take any notice of it?”
Never trust the Mail on health issues (or anything else)
http://www.nice.org.uk/newsroom/news/NICERespondsToDailyMailStory.jsp
NICE one Mail!
Does that ’see pages 6 and 7′ refer to this particular low point in election reporting:
You’re supposed to put your BEST foot forward, Sarah: The Prime Minister’s wife exposes her rather unsightly toes during a visit to Temple
Yes, that really is the headline.
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by mailwatch. mailwatch said: Front Page: Mail: http://bit.ly/dCSYUv #media #dailymail [...]
It is nothing compared Littlejohns pay bonanza.
7% is hardly a “bonanza”
C4 news has just said that it’s the countries in the Euro zone rather than the whole EU who are “bailing out” Greece.
Comments seem largely supportive of Sarah Brown.
(I was expecting calls for her to be burned as a witch).
Add in the NICE article and it amounts to a rather poor day for the Fail.
er.. this NICE organisation. Would that be the same NICE which the Court of Appeal found to have acted unlawfully and unfairly in its appraisal of the drug Aricept ?
Or would it be the same NICE forced into such embarassing u-turns ove the drugs Sutent (mentioned in the NICE letter) and Lucentis?
Or even the NICE so regularly cricitsed by doctors and charities over the time taken to reach decisions, the arbitrary nature of the criteria used and the lack of transparency in its decision making process.
Perhaps, but when drug companies push out drugs that prove to have harmful effects the Mail is the first to get upset: “Heart attacks and suicides… yet the dangers were all kept so quiet. So how CAN you trust your medicine?” http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1033132/Side-effects-include-suicide-heart-attacks-So-prescribed-drugs.html . The Mail’s simplistic line that any doctor should be free to prescribe any drug regardless of cost would be like giving drug companies a licence to print money.
Maybe she was praying for the Forgers Gazette plant to burn down.
Well that’s what i’d be praying for!
“Instead she unveiled a rather unsightly problem on her left foot – her little toe and fourth toe crossed over one another.
She has been placed in direct competition with David Cameron’s wife Samantha, and this will do little to boost her credential’s against ‘SamCam’.” Jesus, people actually bother trying to justify this rag’s existence?
Bang on, JSwindle.
This media focusing on the wives of Brown and Cameron is sickening – particularly in the Daily Hate Mail.
Every pic/article about Sarah Brown is negative, and every one about Samantha Cameron* shows her “blooming” or in some other positive light.
Someone should remind the Fail that we’re not in America.
* Being a grown-up, I use her proper name.
In Littlejohn’s column today:
“Why do people feel it necessary to put their every random thought on the World Wide Web? It’s a sort of technological Tourette’s. And why does anyone take any notice of it?”
Irony?
Excellent Daily Mash article:-
http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/politics/politics-headlines/tories-publish-first-ever-hard%11back-edition-of-the-daily-mail-201004132634/