Ooh good, the Tory story must mean they’ve been in government long enough for the Mail to target them. And that fuck they’ve chosen the shocking story that they’re associated and funded by tax-dodging cunts (Murdoch, Ashcroft, Goldsmith, Barclays and, ahem, Rothermere).
*desperatelty resisting spit roast joke*
Those damn privacy laws, preventing the papers from reporting on what really matters, like who certain England players are having it off with.
Is Elvis in jail again? Maybe he can write a better song about it this time.
I wonder if Mr Dacre or any of his “reporters” have sections of their private life they don’t want publicising?
How dare footballers want to stop newspapers reporting their private life!
The amount of “revelations” the Mail has refused to publish, over the years, because the subject is:
1: An aristocrat
2: A tory
3: A business leader
4: A Thatcher
I don’t think they can too many complaints on the freedom of the press
Tell us the one about the shady treasurer again Mister Littlejohn..
“cheryl’s divorce factor”? what kind of headline is that? did they have to pull “ex factor” at the last minute for some reason?
Ooh good, the Tory story must mean they’ve been in government long enough for the Mail to target them. And that fuck they’ve chosen the shocking story that they’re associated and funded by tax-dodging cunts (Murdoch, Ashcroft, Goldsmith, Barclays and, ahem, Rothermere).
Jim. You missed one
5. Associated with the tabloid press
They never soil their own nest
Hmm, might the choice to place Cheryl’s photo adjacent to the story about the mystery footballer provide some clue to his identity? Just wondering…