I thought the press had told us that “Bulger killer” didn’t like girls!!!
Meanwhile, how about leaving Mrs. Bulger (as was) to get on with her life instead of ringing her up every time something like this happens (or doesn’t!).
Either they couldn’t find a picture of this guard, or she wasn’t good looking enough for the front page. Either way, let’s be honest this story is 5% rage and 95% titilation.
Similarly, does anyone outside the press ever refer to women working in a professional capacity as “girls”, e.g. police girl. Does the Mail ever refer to Melanie Phillips as a girl journalist?
Criminal has sexual relationship shock!
I thought the press had told us that “Bulger killer” didn’t like girls!!!
Meanwhile, how about leaving Mrs. Bulger (as was) to get on with her life instead of ringing her up every time something like this happens (or doesn’t!).
Either they couldn’t find a picture of this guard, or she wasn’t good looking enough for the front page. Either way, let’s be honest this story is 5% rage and 95% titilation.
Nice to use Denise Bulger as a rent-a-quote, tasteful as always
Perhaps they didn’t cover it up. Perhaps they just assumed (with some justification) that it wasn’t important enough to make a public statement.
*Mail fascinated by what’s going on between Royal’s legs shock*
Agree with Phil, why is this considered a front page story, considering all the other stuff in the world at the moment?
Does anyone outside the press ever use the word “tryst”?
Similarly, does anyone outside the press ever refer to women working in a professional capacity as “girls”, e.g. police girl. Does the Mail ever refer to Melanie Phillips as a girl journalist?