The difference is, neither wikileaks nor twitter purport to be anything but largely unsubstantiated rumour. Wiki tries to maintain accuracy but still warns the reader not to trust what’s written there. Unlike these so called “news” papers who try to sell largely unsustantiated rumour, salacious gossip and completely made up stories as the truth.
In answer to the question: I still don’t know who they’re talking about. This is largely because I couldn’t give a proverbial about the celebrity gossip the Mail et al try to pass off as ‘news’.
“Now that hat is sold on eBay for £81,000″ Now I’ve read that headline a few times and I just can’t get it to sound right. Now I know they like having the word Now start a sentence, but even by their low standards it just sounds unbelievably shit.
The Mail is just pissed off that Twitter is encroaching on the pointless celebrity gossip market, I imagine journalists saying to each other, “Bloody tweeters, coming over here, taking our jobs…”
The difference is, neither wikileaks nor twitter purport to be anything but largely unsubstantiated rumour. Wiki tries to maintain accuracy but still warns the reader not to trust what’s written there. Unlike these so called “news” papers who try to sell largely unsustantiated rumour, salacious gossip and completely made up stories as the truth.
Are they restricted on pages that they have now that they decided to print the entire paper on the front page.
As for that hat, kids are dying in poverty and some twat’s bought that for 81k, I hope that person suffers.
In answer to the question: I still don’t know who they’re talking about. This is largely because I couldn’t give a proverbial about the celebrity gossip the Mail et al try to pass off as ‘news’.
“Now that hat is sold on eBay for £81,000″ Now I’ve read that headline a few times and I just can’t get it to sound right. Now I know they like having the word Now start a sentence, but even by their low standards it just sounds unbelievably shit.
The Mail is just pissed off that Twitter is encroaching on the pointless celebrity gossip market, I imagine journalists saying to each other, “Bloody tweeters, coming over here, taking our jobs…”
Does this mean we’ve been ordered not to gag over that hat, but people are doing it anyway?