Surely those were Canadian waves, “Willis” ruled, rather than ‘ours’. (oh for the days when the papers complained about the Royals using helicopters to show off to their mates!)
Ever since the welfare changes of the 1980’s it has been the case that if you need care (unless you have done some unusual er ‘planniong’) they robbed you of your home to pay for your care anyway.
The tory’s brought that in, funnily enough.
The really sad part of this new ‘reform’ is the open admission that it’s crap but if you want the wealthy to go along with it this is as far as they will go.
This supine spineless crowd in Gov could hardly be more open about their gutlessness.
Surely those were Canadian waves, “Willis” ruled, rather than ‘ours’. (oh for the days when the papers complained about the Royals using helicopters to show off to their mates!)
If it was a PR stunt then it’s plainly worked; it’s on the front of a national newspaper.
What’s “hopelessly insecure” mean anyway? Is that like when you try to get people to agree with your viewpoint by misrepresenting the facts?
Retire, THEN pay a 20p-in-the pound cardigan+slippers tax
Amanda Platell, as William Hague’s old spin doctor, will be an expert on PR bollocks.
And curiously little mention in the tabs of the shitstorm that greeted Will’n'Kate in Quebec.
Ever since the welfare changes of the 1980’s it has been the case that if you need care (unless you have done some unusual er ‘planniong’) they robbed you of your home to pay for your care anyway.
The tory’s brought that in, funnily enough.
The really sad part of this new ‘reform’ is the open admission that it’s crap but if you want the wealthy to go along with it this is as far as they will go.
This supine spineless crowd in Gov could hardly be more open about their gutlessness.
Beard *cough*
Cheryl or Kate? (In response to Dai)