One tacky tabloid reporting on the unethical behaviour of another tacky tabloid? Phew. Things much be serious. If I were Mr Dacre I’d be watching out for the “Fake Sheik”. Mr Murdoch may want his revenge.
Interesting reminder on the London Evening Standard (once a Mail title!) site: “In 2006, the former Information Commissioner, Richard Thomas, compiled a snapshot league table of print titles that had paid a particular private detective to obtain personal information on celebrities and other prominent individuals. The table was headed by the Daily Mail …” http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23967793-the-pms-dilemma-is-how-to-handle-the-murdoch-press.do
I also noticed in the newsagent today that the Express has pricked up its ears and started paying attention, complete with a Maddie picture. Coincidence?
At last, they’re giving the phone-hacking story the coverage it deserves. Even the DM can’t ignore this story now.
One tacky tabloid reporting on the unethical behaviour of another tacky tabloid? Phew. Things much be serious. If I were Mr Dacre I’d be watching out for the “Fake Sheik”. Mr Murdoch may want his revenge.
Interesting reminder on the London Evening Standard (once a Mail title!) site: “In 2006, the former Information Commissioner, Richard Thomas, compiled a snapshot league table of print titles that had paid a particular private detective to obtain personal information on celebrities and other prominent individuals. The table was headed by the Daily Mail …”
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23967793-the-pms-dilemma-is-how-to-handle-the-murdoch-press.do
Only six years late to the phone-hacking story.
I also noticed in the newsagent today that the Express has pricked up its ears and started paying attention, complete with a Maddie picture. Coincidence?
Jealousy?
Why did’nt the DM think about this hacking lark.
But they will make up for it somehow
Paul,Rupe and the PCCs code of practise
There’s a laugh there somewhere.