It is currently Thu Jun 20, 2013 9:38 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5152 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256 ... 344  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 4:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 11:36 am
Posts: 1431
Location: NORTHUMBERLAND
Amazonian wrote:
Any red arrows will be from people who want to punch Old Cynic squarely in his smug, stupid, ugly, cuntish gob. Currently 127 of them (me included).

Heh heh! if this is you, storygirl (I spotted the cunningly-added "e"), then nice one...AND you're 42 in the green!

Quote:
Sado masochism and submission are good things to explore to keep ones sex life exciting and thus your marriage fresh. The red arrowers would no doubt prefer adultery and diversion.

- storeygirl, pern, 26/3/2012 10:34


In fact, a lot of surprisingly tolerant comments on there, a lot of them well in the green. Looks like Old Cynic is wrong. Quelle sur-fuckin'-prise...


I am genuinely surprised...and rather embarrassed at 49 Mail readers agreeing with me.

_________________
Blog...http://itsjustahobby.wordpress.com/

Soon, if we are not prudent, millions of people will be watching each other starve to death through expensive television sets. Nye Bevan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 4:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 11:36 am
Posts: 1431
Location: NORTHUMBERLAND
This is 104 in the green. Do loads of kinksters read the daily mail? Maybe we should be reading the bring back flogging threads in a different light.

There is no such thing as a 'loving' caning. If the woman's husband wants to have violence shown to him, then he should seek psychological help. The woman should never have to be forced into a situation creating such cognitive dissonance. Either she is in a loving relationship or she is in a power playing game - the two are mutually exclusive. - Nora, London, UK, 26/3/2012 09:24.........nora your lack of knowledge is only exceeded by your judgmental attitude, canings can be very erotic sensual experiences. As can power games. Just because you don't get something don't rush to use long words you clearly don't understand. Or to suggest therapy for a couple who are clearly communicating in an emotionally healthy and adult manner.
- storeygirl, pern, 26/3/2012 10:37

_________________
Blog...http://itsjustahobby.wordpress.com/

Soon, if we are not prudent, millions of people will be watching each other starve to death through expensive television sets. Nye Bevan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 8:34 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:49 pm
Posts: 10768
Location: Durham
Upon seeing a video of a 5 year old girl being gunned down Someone was moved to post this.
471 cunts have made it the worst rated comment.
Of course the outcome would have been just the same if the victim was white, why wouldn't it be?
Quote:
RIP, my darling.
- Someone, Somewhere, 26/3/2012 16:56
Click to rate Rating 471


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1qFk6PJbm

_________________
That subtle admixture of the absurd and the surreally plausible...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 8:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:24 pm
Posts: 3941
oboogie wrote:
Upon seeing a video of a 5 year old girl being gunned down Someone was moved to post this.
471 cunts have made it the worst rated comment.
Of course the outcome would have been just the same if the victim was white, why wouldn't it be?
Quote:
RIP, my darling.
- Someone, Somewhere, 26/3/2012 16:56
Click to rate Rating 471


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1qFk6PJbm


Quote:
Why am i not surprised by the pictures of the PEOPLE involved!
- Mark Taylor, Blue Manchester , 26/3/2012 20:29


One of the newest comments and 5 already. I predict three figures by the end of the day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 8:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 12409
Location: East London
They must have been surprised by what Raoul Mort looked like.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 8:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:51 pm
Posts: 2005
oboogie wrote:
Upon seeing a video of a 5 year old girl being gunned down Someone was moved to post this.
471 cunts have made it the worst rated comment.
Of course the outcome would have been just the same if the victim was white, why wouldn't it be?
Quote:
RIP, my darling.
- Someone, Somewhere, 26/3/2012 16:56
Click to rate Rating 471


Might it be because she didn't die and they think the commenter should have read the article more thoroughly?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 8:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:51 pm
Posts: 2005
Quote:
Why am i not surprised by the pictures of the PEOPLE involved!
- Mark Taylor, Blue Manchester , 26/3/2012 20:29

That's rather open to a variety of interpretations. Which people? The gang members, the innocent victims or the other members of the public?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 9:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 12409
Location: East London
I think he probably means the gunmen were black.

Asians owning cornershop doesn't quite work for me.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 9:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 2:30 pm
Posts: 5248
Location: Underpants
Tubby Isaacs wrote:
I think he probably means the gunmen were black.

Asians owning cornershop doesn't quite work for me.


Yep, that's how I read it, too.

_________________
Si vas a plagiar noticias, no uses un sitio de noticias falsas como fuente.


Last edited by Carlos The Badger on Thu Feb 31, 2021 18:60 am, edited 666 times in total.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 9:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:51 pm
Posts: 2005
Me too. I think it was the emphasis on 'PEOPLE', which rather implied that they were not really human after all.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 9:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 2:30 pm
Posts: 5248
Location: Underpants
Gourami wrote:
Me too. I think it was the emphasis on 'PEOPLE', which rather implied that they were not really human after all.

Missed that. Yes, you're probably correct!

_________________
Si vas a plagiar noticias, no uses un sitio de noticias falsas como fuente.


Last edited by Carlos The Badger on Thu Feb 31, 2021 18:60 am, edited 666 times in total.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:38 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 2:10 pm
Posts: 1702
Well, it looks like these sort of stories are why I just had to queue round the corner for some diesel to get to work tomorrow.

Chaos on the forecourts? Nearly 8,000 petrol stations could shut after 2,000 Unite fuel drivers vote in favour of strike
Quote:
If the Army is going to be driving the tankers, then just sack the drivers on the spot and train up some more while the Army is delivering. I'll train for the job, and I won't be askintg for £45,000 a year.
- Edgar, Newcastle upon Tyne, 26/3/2012 20:06

Somehow doubt this comment would have 50 green arrows if this was someone with a Polish name offering to undercut the salaries of hardworking British drivers.

_________________
I disagreed with the burglar’s policy, of tying me to a chair. But I did admire his convictions.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:51 pm
Posts: 2005
I'm torn on this one. £45k is a shitload of money for a driving job.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:53 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:49 pm
Posts: 10768
Location: Durham
Gourami wrote:
I'm torn on this one. £45k is a shitload of money for a driving job.

Quote:
Unite's general secretary said the union was simply trying to establish 'minimum standards'.
Diana Holland said: 'These votes send a clear message throughout the industry and should prompt all the major companies to get around the table to establish minimum standards.
'This is not about pay - this is about ensuring that high safety and training standards are maintained, so that our communities are safe.

I'm quite in favour of H&S where fuel tankers are concerned.
I've seen the aftermath of an explosion at a petrol station - it makes a hell of a hole.
£45k is not excessive for an HGV driver these days.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1qGJaGFJe

_________________
That subtle admixture of the absurd and the surreally plausible...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:51 pm
Posts: 2005
I don't dispute that the work needs to be done properly. However, I could name dozens of people with PhDs and various postgraduate qualifications who work with very violent and dangerous people, day in and day out, for under £30k, in some cases under £20k. £45k is a lot for what the job entails. A lot of people are paid a lot less for taking comparable, or greater, risks. Firemen start on £21k and I'm willing to wager their training is at least as rigorous.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5152 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256 ... 344  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cyclist, lord_kobel, Timbo and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group