It is currently Wed May 22, 2013 11:38 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5110 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263 ... 341  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 3:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 2:10 pm
Posts: 1597
"IoW nr. England"

:lol:

_________________
I disagreed with the burglar’s policy, of tying me to a chair. But I did admire his convictions.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 7:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:14 pm
Posts: 3168
Why are they so anti bicycle anyway?* Don't bicycles hark back to a more innocent age of local vicars riding down country lanes on Raleighs in teh 1950z? Or something.

*I do know really:
1) Because they don't damage the environment enough.
2) They are sometimes quite trendy and ridden by young people in Lycra. Young people! GGrrrrr!
3) They take up valuable space on our roads that could be better used by SUVs, 4x4s, and large executive cars.
4) They don't take out nearly enough foxes on their travels


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 11:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 1:30 am
Posts: 5220
Location: Hearing Banjo Music...
Melanie Philips for her fallacy riddled article on the Rochdale sex ring.

_________________
You may say I'm a dreamer.... but I'm not the only one....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 12:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 2:19 am
Posts: 925
Tried to point out that under the current VED system, cyclists do pay the correct rate of "Road Tax". For some reason, it hasn't made it through.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 9:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 2:10 pm
Posts: 1597
Tom_UK wrote:
Why are they so anti bicycle anyway?* Don't bicycles hark back to a more innocent age of local vicars riding down country lanes on Raleighs in teh 1950z? Or something.

*I do know really:
1) Because they don't damage the environment enough.
2) They are sometimes quite trendy and ridden by young people in Lycra. Young people! GGrrrrr!
3) They take up valuable space on our roads that could be better used by SUVs, 4x4s, and large executive cars.
4) They don't take out nearly enough foxes on their travels

I sometimes think they just tune the Twat-o-Tron to "bike" mode and instantly pad out any article on the subject with hundreds of comments on "road" tax, lycra and people who jump red lights/cycle on pavements.

Cycling is supposedly booming among the wealthy 40/50-odd year old market, you'd have thought that's a significant portion of the Mail's demographic.

_________________
I disagreed with the burglar’s policy, of tying me to a chair. But I did admire his convictions.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 9:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 22990
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
The Mail ignores its demographic when it suits.
This will come from the top, it's a message from Dacre's Fantasy Island. Only children use bikes, adult cyclists just get in the way and so need to be bullied. Also, in Dacre World, cyclist = working class, not rich enough to buy a car (as may have been true in about 1946) and so another reason to look down upon, sneer, bully, belittle and hate.

If you want to curry favour with the Vagina Monologue then you produce filler which is to his personal taste. Stories about crazy cycle lanes must amuse him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 10:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:56 pm
Posts: 2081
It's a "common sense" thing. You don't need cycle lanes, health and safety rules, guidelines for emergency services, speed limits, drink drive laws, anti-discrimination legislation etc. etc. because it's common sense not to run over cyclists, not to speed, not to drive pissed and so on, and "common sense" that anyone calling someone a poof, wog, silly cow etc is just having a bit of fun. And of course, anyone reasonable doing such things as drink driving should be let off because common sense says it's fine in their case - it's the lager-swilling yobbos, kids, thugs, forrins and so on (i.e. anyone but them) who need arresting for that sort of crime. Mr Middle Class with a house in the burbs worth £400,000 just driving the Jag 2 miles home after 3 pints of real ale is harmless. Right up until he runs over a child, but then it was probably a feral child from the council estate so it's common sense to let him off with just a warning.

Common sense. Code for standard Mailite complete and utter narrow-minded, pig ignorant, hateful, fuck-witted selfishness.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2012 12:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:24 pm
Posts: 3824
Sorry if it's covered elsewhere, but the top-rated comments here are just beyond belief.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-214192 ... room.html#


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 8:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:50 pm
Posts: 2838
On Mad Mel's latest:
Quote:
It actually demonstrates that the Nazi underclass that developed into the Third Reich is alive and active in Britain under the banner of left Liberalism, always a cover for extreme activities. It never ceases to amaze the way that the luvvies of the silver screen will flock to support any openly fascist and anti western and anti democratic government just so long as it does not affect their own Alice in Wonderland Islington lives, nor their own inflated ego's. Carry on the good work, while the rest of us just roll our eyes every time some luvvy opens their mouth without the guidance of a script trying to convince us that they actually know what they are talking about.
- Ratcatcher, Westminster Sewers, 16/5/2012 15:23


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2012 2:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 1:30 am
Posts: 5220
Location: Hearing Banjo Music...
Left liberalism supports the concept of a superior aryan master race? Try and get your head around that.

The delicious irony of these fuckwits, the commentator and Mel, is the commentator is trying to spread false bile about 'Left Liberalism', being the new third reich, while mel is spreading ill informed bile about the bbc.

The article distorts the position of those who criticize Israel to complain about how Israel is being portrayed in a distorted manner.

Hilarious and an idiotic logic fail of the top order.

The jewish lobby does indeed influence Washington. If the US had not provided Israel with the military aid it has then it would not exist. That's not 'Judeophobia'. That's a hard fact.

Israel exists because it can. This is Israel's justification for existing.

Quote:
The BBC won’t report the Muslim element of paedophile gangs in northern towns


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18092605

Quote:
Groups representing Sikh and Hindu communities have complained about the term "Asian" being used to describe the men involved in grooming trials.

Earlier this month, nine men were jailed for being part of a sex ring in Rochdale which groomed girls for sex.

The groups said the men involved were "almost always of Pakistani origin" and the term "Asian" was inaccurate.

The Ramadan Foundation has said grooming is "a significant problem for the British Pakistani community".

The joint statement was released by the Network of Sikh Organisations UK, The Hindu Forum of Britain, and The Sikh Media Monitoring Group UK.

It says the reluctance of the media and the government to discuss the "disproportionate representation of Muslims in such cases" and the fact victims are "almost always non-Muslim girls" is adding to the cause of far-right groups such as the BNP.

It said blanket use of the word "Asian" was "unfair to other communities of Asian origin".

"We believe that in this case the government itself is sanctioning the use of term Asian as a way of clouding responsibility," the groups say.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18004153

Quote:
"Evidence tells us that there is a significant problem with Pakistani Asian men. We've got to be bold enough to stand up and say this is a problem and not let it get hijacked by the far right. It's only now that people are prepared to discuss this."

Mr Williams-Thomas said he was unsure why the trend appeared to exist, stressing it was "a complex issue" that could involve factors such as disparities in the age of sexual consent in the UK compared with other countries and their perception of females. He said there needed to be research and better cultural engagement.


Therefore Mel is either:

1) Spouting ill informed spew

2) Hypocritically spreading revolting bile about a group (the BBC).


If 1) then she must retract. If 2) or if she does not retract then she is a piece of shit for not doing so.

_________________
You may say I'm a dreamer.... but I'm not the only one....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2012 10:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 2:10 pm
Posts: 1597
Indeed, so desperate were the BBC to sweep this story under the carpet that they only spent around half of last week's Question Time talking about it

_________________
I disagreed with the burglar’s policy, of tying me to a chair. But I did admire his convictions.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2012 11:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 1:30 am
Posts: 5220
Location: Hearing Banjo Music...
sporran wrote:
Indeed, so desperate were the BBC to sweep this story under the carpet that they only spent around half of last week's Question Time talking about it


That too?

Mel's a candidate for this page again then.... :lol:

_________________
You may say I'm a dreamer.... but I'm not the only one....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2012 7:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 6:40 pm
Posts: 1017
Location: Birmingham, UK
Comments are a mixed bag, though. The next-highest rated are as follows:

Quote:
Calling Israel a democracy a complete joke. Democracies don't treat 20% of it's citizens as 2nd class. Democracies don't illegally occupy lands under military rule and apartheid. Democracies don't ghettoise the people they expel from their homes and deny them even the most innocuous of goods. Democracies don't apply discriminatory marriage laws. Democracies don't give one religion special advantage over others. Israel a democracy? Don't make us laugh!
- John Spacey, Birmingham, 17/5/2012 9:24
Click to rate Rating 28


Quote:
Time Melanie started to highlight the abuse of human rights and the repression of the Palestinian people by the Israelis. I believe the tide is starting to turn at last and hopefully Israel will be compelled to act like a civilised state and get off Palestinian land.
- ken, liverpool, 17/5/2012 0:07
Click to rate Rating 26


...and several more along the same lines. So not even all Mail readers buy Mad Mel's line that being against certain abuses committed by Israel is the same as being anti-Jewish.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2012 7:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 10:41 pm
Posts: 3383
Location: Elbonia
daveinbrum wrote:
Quote:
Calling Israel a democracy a complete joke. Democracies don't treat 20% of it's citizens as 2nd class. Democracies don't illegally occupy lands under military rule and apartheid. Democracies don't ghettoise the people they expel from their homes and deny them even the most innocuous of goods. Democracies don't apply discriminatory marriage laws. Democracies don't give one religion special advantage over others. Israel a democracy? Don't make us laugh!
- John Spacey, Birmingham, 17/5/2012 9:24
Click to rate Rating 28

Replace Israel with Great Britain, and most of that still rings true.

_________________
Changin' avatars like there's no tomorrow


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C**t of the day
PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2012 8:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:59 pm
Posts: 783
Location: Ted
Althea wrote:
Replace Israel with Great Britain, and most of that still rings true.


Might be a bit of a stretch comparing the inequalities of British and Israeli societies to be honest. At a push I'd say that you could draw comparisons between the British migrations into Wales, Scotland, Ireland etc during the middle ages and the annexation of Palestine/Judea and Samaria.

British law is criticised for favouring the rich over the poor, and there are numerable cases that prove this to be so, but what Israel has is a clearly defined two-tier system for it's "citizens" drawn solely on the basis of religion and ethnicity. A British Somalian may win a court case against the development tycoon who wants his house demolished. An Israeli Arab or Palestinian wouldn't even get near the court, but stands a good chance of ending up in prison with no charges, lawyer, or chance of appeal whatsoever.

A better comparison, and one which doesn't get made nearly enough, would be between Israel and South Africa during the Botha years.

_________________
"Common Sense is the collection of prejudices aquired by age eighteen" - Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5110 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263 ... 341  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: D.C. Harrison and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group