It is currently Fri May 24, 2013 5:31 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 155 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: James Slack - journo c**twad
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:50 pm
Posts: 2844
At last, hard evidence that can't be ignored: Immigration is reducing jobs for British workers and David Cameron must act now

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... z1j8mQ0iDg

Quote:
MAC has provided the Prime Minister with the evidence he needs to get a grip on immigration.

The question is: will he take it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: James Slack - journo c**twad
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 1:07 am
Posts: 10144
Location: Fantasy land
There is far more evidence suggesting James Slack should be put down for the national good and given Cameron the evidence he needs.

The question is: will he act on it? Because asking "Will he take it?" in this instance is grammatically incorrect and makes you look like a fucking five year old.

_________________
"Even when you're a super-computer with an IQ of 2000 it's brown trousers time."

Reclaiming "methinks" for the nation

Latest blog post - 2011 - a review (updated 07/10)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: James Slack - journo c**twad
PostPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11936
Location: East London
Anyone had a proper look at the report? I imagine a lot of the non-EU immigrants are spouses- it's very common for Pakistanis and Bangldeshis to marry abroad, for example. And, because the population is much bigger, the white population probably marry abroad even more- Mail readers and mail-order brides, for example. There's been talk about increasing the salary you need to marry a "foreigner". Quite a reduction in freedom. But "acting", indeed.

There are also successful applicants for asylum. Is Cameron to "act" by stopping all that humanitarian stuff?

Cameron's "acting" on the economy has of course not cost anyone their job.

No doubt falling numbers of students (paying big fees, and subsidising higher education for us) will be hailed as "acting" too.

I expect the report looks at these things. The Mail won't.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: James Slack - journo c**twad
PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 2:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:50 pm
Posts: 2844
Unelected euro judges are bringing terror to the streets of Britain

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... z1jok5qt80


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: James Slack - journo c**twad
PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 3:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11936
Location: East London
Elected judges- can't see the problem with that, can you? I bet Slack's always red hot on accountability to elected politicians. Heads of academy chains and all.

The FT had some rubbish about how the "liberal establishment" didn't take into account bombs might get let off "in cities" by some of the people they support. Because of coure it's not possible to keep people under surveillance or anything like that. That of course costs money and effort, so a nuisance. But not quite handing the bloke a bomb.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: James Slack - journo c**twad
PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 4:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 5:59 pm
Posts: 5511
Location: London
That reference to unelected judges does seem to be a dog whistle about which no journalist ever seems to expend much thought. I can recall reading an article about how judicial candidates in the US go round all the right-wing groups promising 500 year sentences for burglary, and canvass in the dodgier areas by saying how they're in favour of light sentences. God forbid that that system ever comes into force in the UK.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: James Slack - journo c**twad
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 4:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:50 pm
Posts: 2844
Eric Pickles slams council bosses' pay, but is anyone listening?

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... z1nyNZNmTJ

Quote:
Eric Pickles, that great raging bull of the Tory party, is furious. Again.

As is usual, he has every right to be on the war path.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: James Slack - journo c**twad
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 5:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:08 am
Posts: 7342
Messianic Trees wrote:
Eric Pickles slams council bosses' pay, but is anyone listening?

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... z1nyNZNmTJ

Quote:
Eric Pickles, that great raging bull of the Tory party, is furious. Again.

As is usual, he has every right to be on the war path.


Bull?

When I think of Eric, I picture a different kind of farm animal.
When I see his words I'm back at Bull.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: James Slack - journo c**twad
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 6:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:56 pm
Posts: 2083
What a bizarrely fawning article. I thought Pickles was pretty much thought of as being a pig-headed buffoon who likes to be sucked up to even in Tory circles?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: James Slack - journo c**twad
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 9:56 pm
Posts: 3773
Location: Gunchester
This Eric Pickles?

http://politicalscrapbook.net/2011/12/p ... chief-pay/

Quote:
Eric Pickles, for whom lambasting councils for supposedly wasteful spending is a stock in trade, has paid his department’s interim finance chief nearly £600,000 for only 16 months work.

The department’s permanent secretary revealed the shocking figure — more than £36,000 per month — to a committee of MPs described as “speechless” by LGC’s Alistair Hayman. Sir Bob Kerslake attempted to defend the salary of Stephen Park, hired from PFI kings Capita:

“Clearly, however large that figure is – and I don’t want to suggest it isn’t a large figure – the consequence of not running our finances in a sound way would have been far greater”

This will be difficult to swallow for councils across the country, who have frequently been on the end of Pickles’ criticisms of their spending. As recently as May of this year, he was denouncing a “culture of wild overspends” in local authorities.

“Do as I say, not as I do.”

_________________
Change does not roll in on the wheels of inevitability, but comes through continuous struggle.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: James Slack - journo c**twad
PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 4:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:50 pm
Posts: 2844
Why using private firms could help the Police get more bobbies on the beat

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... z1oFuDSxKi

Quote:
If, by paying private firms to do the back office jobs, we free more police to get their feet out on the pavement, forces should be free to get on with it. No matter how much Labour and the BBC wails.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: James Slack - journo c**twad
PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 4:30 pm 
Offline
Lord of Flangebury-Under-Scythe
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:33 pm
Posts: 4312
I can see no bleating here

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-17242956

Although I realise that for Slack, 'bleating' means not being a Tory mouthpeice. Actually, I doubt he even knows how the BBC reported it, he just stuck in a stock phrase.

_________________
MY COMMENTS ARE FROM THE HORSES MOUTH AND ARE ALL FACTS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: James Slack - journo c**twad
PostPosted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 3:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:50 pm
Posts: 2844
Red Tape UK: How the Coalition is choking our businesses

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... z1piSIOjxB

Quote:
After the blizzard of employment laws forced upon small and medium-sized firms under Labour, which are suffocating chances of economic growth, the Coalition promised to help Britain’s small businesses.

David Cameron vowed to create a 'new economic dynamism' and decreed a 'forensic, relentless focus on growth'.

But with the Chancellor's third Budget today, the Government's rhetoric has yet to be matched by its actions.

......

Inevitably, much of the blame for the Government's failure to help business lies with the tensions between the two Coalition partners.

The Lib Dems are passionate supporters of the EU, and fiercely oppose attempts to slash Brussels red-tape. The party is also committed to 'worker rights'.

Tory attempts to make it easier for firms to get rid of lazy and unproductive workers, following the findings of a report commissioned by ministers which recommended radical reform of employment laws to help economic growth, have been hampered by constant battles with Lib Dem Business Secretary Vince Cable.

You'll be excited to hear that the "Coalition's catalogue of red tape" includes such evils as:
Quote:
National minimum wage increase

Despite the parlous state of the economy, the minimum wage — a flagship Labour policy — went up from £5.93 to £6.08 per hour for adults. Employers' leaders called it 'the wrong increase at the wrong time' and said it was a 'barrier to job creation'. The minimum wage is uprated annually.

Bribery Act

Places onerous new rules on business over the giving and receiving of gifts, hospitality, entertainment and other payments — at home and abroad. Business leaders say smaller firms, faced with costly, time-consuming and complex procedures, will no longer be able to explore new markets.

Also included is something the Mail has previously trumpeted as a good idea:
Quote:
Immigration cap

Number of work permits available to skilled non EU-workers fixed at 21,700 per annum. Policy is supported by campaign groups who want to bring migrant numbers under control, but disliked by businesses, who say it is bureaucratic and restricts their access to skilled labour and makes recruitment harder.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: James Slack - journo c**twad
PostPosted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 10:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 2:07 am
Posts: 3367
Location: chesterfield
So to summarise Slacks argument, the best way to produce growth is to treat workers like shit. If you make it easier to sack people or reduce the rights of agency workers ultimately it will be the tax payer who is left to pick up the bill through Job seekers allowance and other benefits.

_________________
www.newshuddlines.blogspot.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: James Slack - journo c**twad
PostPosted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 11:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 1:30 am
Posts: 5242
Location: Hearing Banjo Music...
Messianic Trees wrote:
Unelected euro judges are bringing terror to the streets of Britain


Aren't UK judges 'unelected'....

Yeah the best kind of justice is to leave it to the people.... :roll:

_________________
You may say I'm a dreamer.... but I'm not the only one....


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 155 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group