It is currently Sun May 19, 2013 3:08 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: The obligatory "Who???" comment.
PostPosted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 4:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 1:23 pm
Posts: 4926
Location: West Midlands
Quote:
He was a good boxer- "he's hurt Tyson!" and all that, but didn't the "Know what I mean, 'Arry?" kick in quite early?


It's an interesting aspect of British culture that not taking yourself seriously is often seen as of more importance than actual talent or success.

On the lunchtime news here, there was coverage of a local girl who's won a gold in Delhi. Her secret of success? Regular curries. Not natural talent honed by long hours of expert coaching and practice, funnily enough. Likewise Bruno. Middling boxer, but can laugh at himself. Thus alright.

Or Status Quo. Three-chord pub rockers of limited repertoire. But they do a fantastic amount for charidee, and have a self-deprecating cameo on Corrie. What guys!

In a way I like this. We like our heroes to have feet of clay, to be grounded in reality. We don't deify them or pretend that they are anything less than human. In a way this plays into the celeb 'myth' peddled by the X Factor and the like - that anyone can get the break and become famous; but it also leads to a paradox in which we are told to dream of the celeb lifestyle, while constantly being shown just how normal and common these celebs are. Almost "They may be richer, more famous, more glamorous than you, but they're still shit".

_________________
Ten seconds... the pain begins.

Fifteen seconds... you can't breathe.

Twenty seconds... you give up and turn off the Jeremy Vine show.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The obligatory "Who???" comment.
PostPosted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 5:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 1:07 am
Posts: 10144
Location: Fantasy land
Andy McDandy wrote:
It's an interesting aspect of British culture that not taking yourself seriously is often seen as of more importance than actual talent or success.


You simply have to look at the cricket, and the difference between the attitudes to Kevin Pietersen and Andrew Flintoff.

Kevin Pietersen is a world class player, one of the greatest players ever to wear an England shirt, is very professional in his attitude to training, playing etc. and is generally viewed with disdain by a lot of England fans.

Andrew Flintoff was a good player, a great one on his day, but nothing like as consistently good as KP, spent most of his time chugging beer, eating kebabs and getting stuck on pedalos in the Carribean, and was widely loved. See also: Ian Botham.

_________________
"Even when you're a super-computer with an IQ of 2000 it's brown trousers time."

Reclaiming "methinks" for the nation

Latest blog post - 2011 - a review (updated 07/10)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The obligatory "Who???" comment.
PostPosted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 5:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:08 am
Posts: 7319
Would that be the Kevin Pietersen who couldn't hod a catch in the 05 Ashes (Though he scored a few runs to compensate),
and is now struggling to score runs.

Just my opinion, but Flintoff and Botham both had the magic to win a game.
The ability to conjure 6 overs of unplayable bowling and demolish an innings.

It's extremely hard for a batsman to deliver that kind of devastation in a short package.
Partly because the skipper can whistle up his killer bowled when the time demands,
and partly because batting is more of a shared activity than bowling.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The obligatory "Who???" comment.
PostPosted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 1:07 am
Posts: 10144
Location: Fantasy land
Oh don't get me wrong, I'm not disparaging the achievements of Botham and Flintoff, but they weren't as good for as consistently long a time as Pietersen has been.

KP's dropped catches actually endeared him a bit to the fans, then he became more professional and the liking fell away.

_________________
"Even when you're a super-computer with an IQ of 2000 it's brown trousers time."

Reclaiming "methinks" for the nation

Latest blog post - 2011 - a review (updated 07/10)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The obligatory "Who???" comment.
PostPosted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 22888
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
Quote:
I'm sure commenters who do this do it because they believe an ignorance of pop culture (and, as demonstrated by the case of Solomon Burke, that more or less covers everything post Glenn Miller) is an indicator of good breeding and superiority. As opposed to what it actually is - an indicator of pig ignorance about the world around you and a core of snide bitterness that thinks someone's death is an excellent opportunity to try and do some social climbing.


Exactly that - sums it up very well, I think.

Mind you, when it comes to modern culture I'm just ignorant...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The obligatory "Who???" comment.
PostPosted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11831
Location: East London
As someone wiser than me said of football, we like players who can play like "continentals" without living like one.

Botham's back injury did for him as a bowler, and he never managed to improve his batting to make up for it. Whether that was for want of trying, I don't know.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The obligatory "Who???" comment.
PostPosted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:56 pm
Posts: 2075
Andy McDandy wrote:
Quote:
He was a good boxer- "he's hurt Tyson!" and all that, but didn't the "Know what I mean, 'Arry?" kick in quite early?

In a way I like this. We like our heroes to have feet of clay, to be grounded in reality. We don't deify them or pretend that they are anything less than human. In a way this plays into the celeb 'myth' peddled by the X Factor and the like - that anyone can get the break and become famous; but it also leads to a paradox in which we are told to dream of the celeb lifestyle, while constantly being shown just how normal and common these celebs are. Almost "They may be richer, more famous, more glamorous than you, but they're still shit".


I agree - it's always nicer to see someone who flukes it a bit rather than goes mental at it. And probably healthier for them (and the people who look up to them) too.

Which might explain the appeal of The Apprentice - nothing like watching ultra-egos be made to look like imbeciles each week - and why occasionally when certain sportsmen (*cough* John Terry *cough*) get brought down because they can't do whatever they like and get away with it, it's quite gratifying.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The obligatory "Who???" comment.
PostPosted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 1:07 am
Posts: 10144
Location: Fantasy land
Malcolm Armsteen wrote:
Quote:
I'm sure commenters who do this do it because they believe an ignorance of pop culture (and, as demonstrated by the case of Solomon Burke, that more or less covers everything post Glenn Miller) is an indicator of good breeding and superiority. As opposed to what it actually is - an indicator of pig ignorance about the world around you and a core of snide bitterness that thinks someone's death is an excellent opportunity to try and do some social climbing.


Exactly that - sums it up very well, I think.

Mind you, when it comes to modern culture I'm just ignorant...


There's nothing wrong with being ignorant, so long as you're not belligerent about it. Or in other words...

I don't know = Fine
I don't know and I'm proud of this = Cunt

_________________
"Even when you're a super-computer with an IQ of 2000 it's brown trousers time."

Reclaiming "methinks" for the nation

Latest blog post - 2011 - a review (updated 07/10)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The obligatory "Who???" comment.
PostPosted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:56 pm
Posts: 2075
Or the flip side: I admit I don't know much about classical music. But from what I do know, I know I prefer more modern music on the whole. To a reasonable person, that's an expression of personal taste. To a mailite, I'm an uncultured idiot because what I like doesn't = what they like.

See also: comedy, clothing styles, writing style, technology, food/drink...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The obligatory "Who???" comment.
PostPosted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:56 pm
Posts: 2075
bluebellnutter wrote:
I don't know = Fine
I don't know and I'm proud of this = Cunt


Also:

I don't know, I'm proud of this, but from my position of ignorance I'm still going to tell you you're an idiot for disagreeing with me = Peter Hitchens


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The obligatory "Who???" comment.
PostPosted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:39 pm
Posts: 5969
Location: That London
See also: people who proudly claim they never read books, who seem to be under the impression this marks them out as maverick freethinkers whose experience in the School of Hard Knocks and the University of Life trumps all else.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The obligatory "Who???" comment.
PostPosted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 22888
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
In fact decry all knowledge, understanding or expertise on the same basis.

Teachers = childminders/Trots
Administrators = pen pushers
Police = shirkers


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The obligatory "Who???" comment.
PostPosted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 1:23 pm
Posts: 4926
Location: West Midlands
Anything they don't understand = useless waste of time.

Any job they don't understand, and does not involve heavy lifting = non-job.

_________________
Ten seconds... the pain begins.

Fifteen seconds... you can't breathe.

Twenty seconds... you give up and turn off the Jeremy Vine show.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The obligatory "Who???" comment.
PostPosted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 1:23 pm
Posts: 4926
Location: West Midlands
Fflaps wrote:
See also: people who proudly claim they never read books, who seem to be under the impression this marks them out as maverick freethinkers whose experience in the School of Hard Knocks and the University of Life trumps all else.


I once shared a house with a die-hard and rather unchristian (in general attitude) Evangelical Christian. She told me, totally off the cuff and at the end of a very long and hard day's work (for me - she seemed to do nothing and live off her parents' money) as I came in, that I spent so much time reading books and listening to the radio that I had no opinions or thoughts of my own, and was just regurgitating the thoughts of others, as opposed to her.

I pointed out the irony in her statement, especially coming from a bible-basher like her. She started to cry at that point and said I was a horrible bully. Sorry to say I didn't feel guilty at all.

_________________
Ten seconds... the pain begins.

Fifteen seconds... you can't breathe.

Twenty seconds... you give up and turn off the Jeremy Vine show.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The obligatory "Who???" comment.
PostPosted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:39 pm
Posts: 5969
Location: That London
Speak You're Branes has an excellent post on this subject

http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougoliv ... than-thee/

Quote:
Common sense is the artificial inflation of the value of meagre knowledge. It’s the intellectual equivalent of ‘having a good personality’. It’s the consolation prize for those too dim to achieve anything beyond remembering to breathe for long enough to reproduce. It’s the same level of earthy wisdom that deems modern art ‘crap’, pure research ‘a waste of time’ and Strictly Come Dancing ‘entertainment’. It’s the undentable armour of the stupid, and you’ll never catch them without it. You take it away from them, they’ve got nothing. They’re left naked in the laughing face of their own inferiority, with no choice but to confront the meandering pointlessness of their lives. Which is a lot to confront all in one go.

They cling to it out of fear. Pity them.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Jollity and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group