the fleshy demagogue Alex Salmond, determined to smash our nation in order to establish his own fiefdom north of the Tweed.

threatening to hold and win his independence referendum at a time of his choosing

The picture painted in large parts of the media is one in which Salmond's quest is almost inevitable, a product of the contemporary trend toward national disintegration

he will lead a new nation to stand along the likes of, ahem, Iceland or Ireland.

The Scottish ‘Parliament’ has no legal authority to undertake such actions. Its competences are strictly limited, and on constitutional matters it is entirely subordinate to the real Parliament of our United Kingdom sitting in Westminster.

Campaigner for free-speech, moral decency, a sense of national duty and love of Britain, against the legalisation of drugs, for free-markets both domestically and globally, low-taxes, and the destruction of the idea of a federal EU.

“We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality” A. Rand

Every year Britain gives a staggering £280million in aid to India.

India, the country that for the last thousand years has been one of the largest economies in the world.

Today India has a space programme, whilst the UK cannot afford one, yet our government continues to pump millions into the Indian economy. India has more billionaires than the UK (in dollar terms), yet the Government continues to channel tax-payer's money there.

Within the last four weeks the Germans have outrageously plotted to cunningly take over the Greek Parliament

The EU now has so much power due to the Lisbon Treaty due to the range and depth of the increase competences that gives to the European Commission (the law-making body of the EU). The EU has the potential to set-up an unlimited number of quango styled governing institutions. This is to an ever greater regulatory cost to the British economy, and more importantly liberty and autonomy of individual action- that it should be a constant cause of concern to the governing members of the largest political party by membership of the UK.

That this is not done, favours the critics adage of politics as being the rigid pursuit of self-interest over national concern. A criticism that must be fervently fought to be overturned by Conservative activists all over the country who must not put up with Cameron and his acolytes for the sake of power at the cost of democracy.

it should be a constant cause of concern to the governing members of the largest political party by membership of the UK.

Ray Honeyford, who died last week, warned us about the harm to national identity multiculturalism would cause, and the alienation of ethnic minorities that would result as a consequence of implementing this policy.

Make no mistake about it - 'multiculturalism' is the deft and subtle practice of racism.

The misjudgment by parts of the media, and the public, of Ray Honeyford echoes the treatment of one of the great British patriots of the 20th century, Brigadier and Professor John Enoch Powell.

Multiculturalism is also the most disgusting statement of contempt for British history and culture- it fosters the idea that British culture cannot be practised exclusively on British soil. This latter aspect weakens our national identity and, in turn, our country.

'Cultural enrichment' is the approved term for the West Indian's right to create an ear splitting cacophony for most of the night to the detriment of his neighbour's sanity, or for the Notting Hill Festival whose success or failure is judged by the level of street crime which accompanies it.

The hysterical political temperament of the Indian sub continent became evident an extraordinary sight in an English School Hall. There was much shouting and fist waving. … The disorder was orchestrated. Questions were always preceded by a nod from a Muslim leader. A half-educated and volatile Sikh usurped the privileges of the chair by deciding who was to speak.

Multiculturalism is also the most disgusting statement of contempt for British history and culture- it fosters the idea that British culture cannot be practised exclusively on British soil.

With Cameron’s multicultural speech in mind it is time that we stop hounding men such as Honeyford and Powell. Men who understood the problems of mass-immigration without assimilation.

Only then will we be able to protect, and support, our national identity and the long rooted cultural traditions of our country.

There have been just under 7 million abortions in the forty years after the Act has come into force. This questions whether there is a relationship with this, on occasion, overused convenience of abortion and our dependency on mass immigration. This is to make up for the loss caused by, what might justifiably with such large numbers be described as, mass infanticide.

According to the General Practitioner, Dr. David Devlin one in three women in the U.K. use the Pill. The loss of labour force as a result of the pill is simply incalculable.

He must also open a moral debate on the sustainability of our culture and heritage as a result of the dependency on immigration that our sexual licentiousness, through birth-control, has caused. This debate will be as controversial, as it is necessary.

This is to make up for the loss caused by, what might justifiably with such large numbers be described as, mass infanticide.