It is currently Sun May 19, 2013 11:53 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 115 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Abhijit Pandya
PostPosted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 12:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:51 pm
Posts: 2005
davidjay wrote:
It's a sad truism that some of the least empathetic people around are second or third generation immigrants themselves.


Image
You've got to seriously wonder about internalised racism.


Image

Some people will always side with the people who have it in for them.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abhijit Pandya
PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:19 pm
Posts: 13
Galloway’s victory is a vindication for, above all people, Enoch Powell.

http://pandyablog.dailymail.co.uk/2012/03/galloways-victory-is-the-last-thing-british-muslims-need.html

Quote:
Powell warned of the dangers that mass immigration would have. Ted Heath failed to listen, what we have is Galloway- a product of classic third world, unassimilated, rabble-rousing, emerging democratic engineering of elections.

Galloway’s victory shows that we now have our ghettoes. We have segregation. We have a divided land with the consequences of not assimilating failed third-world backward cultures within us. These are growing and multiplying generation after generation.


Quote:
Galloway represents better than any other politician the modern unholy alliance of the far left and Islamofascism. The overriding principle of the far left, we must remember, is a visceral hatred for British heritage and interests.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abhijit Pandya
PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 3:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:51 pm
Posts: 2005
The tie tucked in to the waistband speaks volumes. I'm guessing it is also tucked into his Y-fronts.


Kierkegaard said, "Once you label me you negate me". I think this perhaps guy has turned it around. "If I negate me you can't label me"?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abhijit Pandya
PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 8:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11831
Location: East London
Our hero lost his deposit in the Leicester South by-election lasyyear:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leicester_ ... nstituency)

Not the real England though, eh?

Real enough for him to get 1/7 of the Lib Dem vote. The only sad thing was that Yvonne Ridley wasn't standing (as she had in 2004 and 2005), so he could have come 5th.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abhijit Pandya
PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 9:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:59 pm
Posts: 783
Location: Ted
Quote:
Not the real England though, eh?


Encouraging to see they kicked the BNP firmly into touch after that brief flirtation, likewise UKIP :lol:


OT, but the life-ring behind old Abihjit says Mervyn King. Media elite conspiracy?
And another thing, that is the most awkward attempt to cash in on the pub vote I have ever seen. He looks like someone's just handed him a vagrant's sperm sample.

_________________
"Common Sense is the collection of prejudices aquired by age eighteen" - Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abhijit Pandya
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 7:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11831
Location: East London
Ted Heath didn't listen to Powell to the extent that he passed a new Immigration Law in 1971.

Heath's sacking of Powell might have been something to do with the torrent of cuntery that he unleashed.

How did Powell feel about your parents (Ugandan Asians), Pandya?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abhijit Pandya
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 7:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11831
Location: East London
ha, ha

A UKIP blogger unimpressed with Pandya in Leicester South:

http://bloggers4ukip.blogspot.co.uk/201 ... gated.html

Quote:
The seat was unwinnable anyway but the extent of our loss in Leicester South was down to Abhijit Pandya who, despite defending his comments at the time, has since removed them from his blog. Twenty four grand and a disgruntled, diheartened campaign team too late.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abhijit Pandya
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 4:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:19 pm
Posts: 13
Time for Britain to withdraw from the UN Convention on Refugees

http://pandyablog.dailymail.co.uk/2012/04/the-supreme-court-has-paved-the-way-to-abolishing-the-uks-asylum-obligations.html

Quote:
This factor, and the costs of running the asylum service, the huge burden on social services that asylum claimants make- makes a clear case for Britain to repeal its international obligations in the Refugee (asylum seekers) Convention.


Quote:
Many asylum claimants come from countries that are war-torn. These states often fail due to low development rates as a result of poor education, a poor level of useful employable skills and a poorly functioning economy.

As a result of these characteristics asylum seekers are a disproportionate burden on the taxpayer, as they live off social services and can probably contribute very little to the British economy in their lifetime.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abhijit Pandya
PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 2:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11831
Location: East London
The point of asylum is to boost the domestic economy?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abhijit Pandya
PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 9:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:08 am
Posts: 7319
Helveticus wrote:
Time for Britain to withdraw from the UN Convention on Refugees

http://pandyablog.dailymail.co.uk/2012/04/the-supreme-court-has-paved-the-way-to-abolishing-the-uks-asylum-obligations.html

Quote:
This factor, and the costs of running the asylum service, the huge burden on social services that asylum claimants make- makes a clear case for Britain to repeal its international obligations in the Refugee (asylum seekers) Convention.


Quote:
Many asylum claimants come from countries that are war-torn. These states often fail due to low development rates as a result of poor education, a poor level of useful employable skills and a poorly functioning economy.

As a result of these characteristics asylum seekers are a disproportionate burden on the taxpayer, as they live off social services and can probably contribute very little to the British economy in their lifetime.


Or perhaps they fail because they're being used as a playground by warlords and their outside sponsors.

If states "Fail" die to poor development, then where were the failed states before - say 1940.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abhijit Pandya
PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11831
Location: East London
And there'd be plenty of money if dictators didn't steal it etc....

Where do the dictators send their stolen money to then?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abhijit Pandya
PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:34 am
Posts: 5363
Location: A town near the Sea
I'm glad no one is listening to this utter fuckwit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abhijit Pandya
PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 9:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:19 pm
Posts: 13
Here comes Pandya with his legal hat on...

How dare a foreign court tell us what to do?

http://pandyablog.dailymail.co.uk/2012/ ... to-do.html

Quote:
Britain, the country that not so long ago had the greatest Empire that the world has ever seen, or likely to see- now has to wait for the permission of a foreign court to extradite evil villains that threaten its own people. Why?

For god’s sake, Why can’t our Government see how embarrassing this is for our people and our extraordinary history?


Quote:
As I have stated before: The European Convention on Human Rights is a unique hypocrisy amongst International Instruments claiming to protect liberty.

We don’t need it. We have a history of liberty going to Magna Carta that the United States copied when drafting of the US constitution.

We taught the world what freedom was, and if we reawakened our traditions we could do so again.

The most important argument against the European Rights Convention is not about its effectiveness of protecting liberty (which the Convention has a dubious record of by giving human rights to paedophiles).

It is about national pride and sovereignty. Our Sovereignty.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abhijit Pandya
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11831
Location: East London
Foreign court? Seemed to be OK with Churchill. But of course his patriotism isn't as good as UKIP's.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abhijit Pandya
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 12:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:19 pm
Posts: 13
The University head seeking to force Islamic Values on British Students

Failing to fight multiculturalism...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... ds-newsxml

Quote:
The Vice-Chancellor should not be bowing to a minority culture, but should rather encourage young Muslims to consider whether isolation is worth the cost of ignoring such an important British tradition as social drinking.


Quote:
The Vice-Chancellor's proposals do nothing to fight multiculturalism, and they also do nothing to help the Muslim students integrate into larger society once they leave the University and the close protective confines of University Islamic societies.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 115 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group