Pandya was the utterly useless UKIP candidate for Harrow in the 2010 general election and then an unmitigated disaster in the Leicester South by-election where he called Islam a degenerate religion and called for workshy muslims to be deported. At the time he was committing political suicide in Leicester South (1 in 5 people in the constituency are muslims) he was head of research for UKIP - a position that he was forced to resign shortly afterwards.

Every time Pandya puts pen to paper, he shows the full extent of his ignorance and extremist opinions.

May as well be chief of Dutch Mountain Rescue.

To deal with multiculturalism on this front and the changing face of our country, we have had to spend huge amounts of time and money to enact specific criminal laws in the last ten years to deal with these backward cultures that seek to carry out this abhorrent practice.

What is the point of the supposed economic benefits of these immigrants if they come into our country and do this?

The rise of Islamic immigration from Somalia, Ethiopia and Sudan over the last decade created by Labour has led to a significant increase in FGM.

This may be just one of the many disgusting worms that multiculturalism without integration that has become hidden because of mass immigration in our country...

Both the federalists that dominate the EU and the member states that allowed Greece to join the Euro, are partly to blame for the rise of far-left fascism in that country.

The Golden Dawn (Chryssi Avgi) group won 21 seats in the Greek elections, and its supporters have been accused of carrying Hitler slogans, acting out far-left Nazi salutes and threatening journalists.

We must check the EU federalists, or risk the rise of extremist politics

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... z1uaVdbBes


"Far-left fascism"? What? Yes, it's that long established far-right party:

Moron.

Where banks are concerned, regulatory responses are often commercially restricting, difficult to comply with, and ineffective in lowering commercial risk. They are commercially restricting to the extent that they curb the ability of banking houses to move out of recession and re-boot the economy. This is often done by shifting business towards high-risk products in the battle for survival.

With this increasing penchant for trenchant, in the long-term ineffective, regulatory responses to banking error, the taxpayer loses twice over: Firstly on bailout, and secondly through an increasing risk of unemployment.

It would be better for banks to crash and burn where they deserve to, and for governments not to get involved in second-guessing market risk, through unworkable regulation, for political gain.

Instead they would be better suited to improving the legal framework that eases the takeover of poorer-performing banks by their healthier counterparts.

Further, politicians ought to realise that the best way to protect the taxpayer is not to get involved in bailouts at all.