It is currently Wed May 22, 2013 8:48 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1054 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 ... 71  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 22976
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
He doesn't say they aren't sexual, he says there is no sexual activity.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2011 11:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 2:07 am
Posts: 3352
Location: chesterfield
The Mail seems to display a lot of hypocrisy on the subject of CCTV.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2061394/Council-accused-staggering-invasion-privacy-plans-record-CCTV-conversation-takes-place-taxi-cabs.html

So one minute it's a staggering invasion of privacy then again it also provides plenty of crime related stories for the paper which can be written without the journalist having to leave the office.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2061397/CCTV-catches-man-stealing-poppy-tin--starts-collecting-charity-money-HIMSELF.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2061319/Crazed-axeman-Glynn-Spiller-bursts-Bristol-shop-Jacks-Off-Sales-terrifies-family.html

_________________
www.newshuddlines.blogspot.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2011 11:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 10:12 am
Posts: 4668
Location: Canolbarth Cymru
It's simple. CCTV should be used to watch criminals, not me.

It shouldn't be too difficult to calibrate the software only to start recording if the facial-recognition algorithms spot someone acting a bit shifty. Or if their eyes are too close together. Of if they're a bit, you know, foreign-looking.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 12:59 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:24 pm
Posts: 3823
Recording taxi conversations is a bit off though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 1:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 2:10 am
Posts: 416
satnav wrote:
[url]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2061319/Crazed-axeman-Glynn-Spiller-bursts-Bristol-shop-Jacks-Off-Sales-terrifies-family.html[/url]


Poor old Sales!

_________________
Blog on books and book-related matters | Common English Errors For Bloggers | Things that mildly irritate me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 2:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:00 am
Posts: 6725
Location: Time Vortex
Crap excuse of the week.
Quote:
But, amazingly, Spiller claimed that his dog could have carried his cap to the scene.

Not something you expect to read in the Mail. Something good about a Romanian.
Quote:
Mr Sand, 30, a self-employed delivery driver originally from Romania but living in Arnos Vale, Bristol, said: 'I work near the shop, I knew he has a little girl there and my concern was if this man was hitting the little girl - that's why I reacted like this

_________________
Sick Left-wing Zealot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2011 8:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:31 am
Posts: 760
Malcolm Armsteen wrote:
So how would the photos of my grand-daughter dancing along to Angelina Ballerina go down?


Shit.. I'd better delete the picture of my nine month old grinning at me in the bath, too!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2011 5:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:49 pm
Posts: 10445
Location: Durham
The classic Steve McQueen movie immortalised three tunnels at Stalag Luft III PoW camp, now astonished archaeologists have discovered a fourth called George
As we know the Mailites are very keen on historical accuracy in films, especially war films. Changing the name of a dog renders an entire film unwatchable.

This classic "Steve McQueen movie" is mostly fairly accurate, apart from Steve McQueen's character and the film's most famous scene, the motorcycle chase.

-No Americans took part in the escape
-McQueen's character never wears uniform, if he had been captured like that he would have almost certainly been shot as a spy. Even if he wasn't shot the first thing the Germans would have done is put him in uniform. A large part of the film is the construction of escape kits, yet one prisoner is allowed to wander about in civilian clothes?
-If anyone had assaulted German soldiers like he did, worn a German uniform, and done many of the other things he did (like walking over the Warning Wire), he would have been shot. Many times over.
-The motorcycle scene was entirely fictional, added at McQueen's own insistence. The bike used is a post war British Triumph, not a BMW or Zundapp as used by the German army.

Do these inaccuracies attract fury? Are the comments all about how they refuse to watch it?
Not a peep.
Mostly they seem to be about how Britain isn't worth escaping to today.
Hypocritical cunts.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1eGNHDu8o

_________________
That subtle admixture of the absurd and the surreally plausible...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 9:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:50 pm
Posts: 2837
Parents who let girls dress in sexy outfits and wear make-up 'can't tell right from wrong'
Headmistress says letting youngsters dress in sexy clothing is a sign of society’s eroded moral values
Near-pornographic images on shows such as x Factor partly to blame


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1eKJ33vBh

Quote:
Parents are subjected to a barrage of near-pornographic images – such as those on ITV’s X Factor.

And, because they have been failed by a poor education, lacking in the teaching of moral standards, they are unable to see that it is wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 2:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 6:10 pm
Posts: 4254
Location: That fancy London, with it's book learning. Sadly not being anywhere else..
So she's saying that the parents know no better because they were poorly educated.

Parents who -given their average age- would have been schooled in the seventies or earlier?

I wonder if that's what she actualy meant, because that's certainly how it reads.

Plus, I maintain (via the constant media and online coverage the show gets - I certainly don't watch it) that I've yet to see anything you could class as borderline "pornographic".

Perhaps pornographic intent is subjective. Some people have a high heel fetish - doesn't mean you should ban people on television from wearing shoes.

I hate shows like X Factor. Yet even I am sick of this -along with various other Mail hate figures- been seen as reasons for behaviour that would happen anyway regardless.

If they're basing this claim of X Factor is porn purely on flesh shown (which seems to be the idea), then by that logic my current avatar is more fully pornographic than anything that's passed as an outfit so far on the show. Yet you can see that on store shelves at child height all over the place...no one's complaining about that.

Well...I'm not anyway.

_________________
"Now get those trousers off before someone dies!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 2:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 2741
Location: Manchester
shyamz wrote:
Parents who -given their average age- would have been schooled in the seventies or earlier?
.


Or possibly the Eighties. But obviously that can't be right, because Thatcher was in charge then.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 3:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 1:07 am
Posts: 10144
Location: Fantasy land
Anyone who thinks the X Factor is in any way pornographic needs to watch a better quality of pornography.

_________________
"Even when you're a super-computer with an IQ of 2000 it's brown trousers time."

Reclaiming "methinks" for the nation

Latest blog post - 2011 - a review (updated 07/10)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 3:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:21 pm
Posts: 3800
Location: Magic Swirling Ship
There are plenty of tits on the X-Factor though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 4:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:23 pm
Posts: 3758
Location: C*nt, c*nt, c*nt, c*nt, c*nt, c*nt, c*nt...
oboogie wrote:
The classic Steve McQueen movie immortalised three tunnels at Stalag Luft III PoW camp, now astonished archaeologists have discovered a fourth called George
As we know the Mailites are very keen on historical accuracy in films, especially war films. Changing the name of a dog renders an entire film unwatchable.

This classic "Steve McQueen movie" is mostly fairly accurate, apart from Steve McQueen's character and the film's most famous scene, the motorcycle chase.

-No Americans took part in the escape
-McQueen's character never wears uniform, if he had been captured like that he would have almost certainly been shot as a spy. Even if he wasn't shot the first thing the Germans would have done is put him in uniform. A large part of the film is the construction of escape kits, yet one prisoner is allowed to wander about in civilian clothes?
-If anyone had assaulted German soldiers like he did, worn a German uniform, and done many of the other things he did (like walking over the Warning Wire), he would have been shot. Many times over.
-The motorcycle scene was entirely fictional, added at McQueen's own insistence. The bike used is a post war British Triumph, not a BMW or Zundapp as used by the German army.

Do these inaccuracies attract fury? Are the comments all about how they refuse to watch it?
Not a peep.
Mostly they seem to be about how Britain isn't worth escaping to today.
Hypocritical cunts.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1eGNHDu8o





Quote:
I'm also puzzled about how so much dirt from the three tunnels could have been spread around the compound so easily. Still, it's a great film.

- Chris, Bristol, England, 20/11/2011 11:10
Click to rate Rating 53



Image

Well Chris, the Mk2 Cavalry Twill, military issue trousers for the use of, could hold up to 50 pounds of soil in each leg. The photograph in the article clearly shows 'Bunty' Fotherington, (far right) releasing some waste material from the tunnel.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 5:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:00 am
Posts: 6725
Location: Time Vortex
Quote:
I'm also puzzled about how so much dirt from the three tunnels could have been spread around the compound so easily. Still, it's a great film.

- Chris, Bristol, England, 20/11/2011 11:10
Click to rate Rating 53

I've submitted a comment that they dug a hole and buried it. I'm not holding my breath though.

_________________
Sick Left-wing Zealot.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1054 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 ... 71  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group