It is currently Tue May 21, 2013 9:23 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1054 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 ... 71  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2011 8:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:31 am
Posts: 760
I feel very sorry for the legions of mail furtlers looking at that!

Oh my... Look at that FILTHY harlot... <locks study door and unbuckles belt>

She's barely wearing anything.... Fapfapfap... <scrolls down>

Ooohh.. There's more of them... Dirty girls.. Dirty dirty girls... Need putting over my knee.. <scrolls down>

Nasty sluts the lot of them... Filthy nasty sluts fap fap!

<scrolls down>

Fap fap fap.......

Oh fuck... It's Jeremy Clarkson.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:56 pm 
Online

Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 2:07 am
Posts: 3348
Location: chesterfield
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2071121/Matthew-Wright-forced-apologise-Taggart-joke-Liam-Aitchison-murder.html

A story criticizing Matthew Wright for joking about the death of a teenager in Scotland comes complete with a clip of the remarks.

I wonder if the Mail are really offended by Wright or are they just using the story to knock Channel 5 because it is owned by Richard Desmond.

_________________
www.newshuddlines.blogspot.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 12:51 pm
Posts: 396
Location: Rochdale
satnav wrote:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2071121/Matthew-Wright-forced-apologise-Taggart-joke-Liam-Aitchison-murder.html

A story criticizing Matthew Wright for joking about the death of a teenager in Scotland comes complete with a clip of the remarks.

I wonder if the Mail are really offended by Wright or are they just using the story to knock Channel 5 because it is owned by Richard Desmond.


I'm quite happy to watch Rothermere and Desmond knock lumps out of each other if I'm honest.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 1:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 6:10 pm
Posts: 4246
Location: That fancy London, with it's book learning. Sadly not being anywhere else..
There's been a lot of critisism in the comments of their relentless BBC battering recently, so perhaps they just see it as a great opportunity to attack someone new and make them appear a little less beeb-obsessed until it all cools down a bit.

_________________
"Now get those trousers off before someone dies!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 2:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:49 pm
Posts: 10443
Location: Durham
This comment caught my eye, it seems an unfortunate but understandable reaction to me.

Quote:
Sorry but I am from stornoway and am saddened and shocked by the awful news, but couldn't help but say the exact same thing as him when I told my relative about it. Just shows how brainwashed by telly I am and never even watched taggart! :-(
- lottie, St elsewhere, 7/12/2011 16:12
Click to rate Rating 370

I wonder if that's our own LottieZero who describes herself as "Further North than you, probably" Stornoway seems a fairly strong contender for that title.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1ftv2K6U7

_________________
That subtle admixture of the absurd and the surreally plausible...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 2:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:59 am
Posts: 12685
Location: Up my own arse.
Seems to me to be confected offence. All Wright seems to have done is to pick up (albeit pretty crassly) on the fact that the crime was committed in the Scottish highlands, and frivolously referenced the well-known phrase from the long-running Scottish police drama series, "there's been a murder". Factually, that's entirely accurate - there really had been a murder. The light-heartedness was, probably just in passing, about Scotland and the Scots, not the murder itself, I'd say.

There's a long and honourable tradition in UK society of dealing with harsh reality via gallows humour - "if you didn't laugh, you'd cry". Surely that was all this was, but it's now been scandalised where there was no need to do so.

In summary, just more bollocks.

_________________
I'm a nasty, violent lefty. You cunt.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 2:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:49 pm
Posts: 10443
Location: Durham
Exactly.
"There's been a murder" must be one of the most popular phrases for irritating English people trying to put on a Scots accent, can a nation have a catchphrase I wonder?
If it had been in Oxford no doubt there would have been a Morse reference.

_________________
That subtle admixture of the absurd and the surreally plausible...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 3:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:14 pm
Posts: 3168
She's at it again: Veteran exhibitionist Kate Moss never tires of stripping for Pirelli calendar

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... endar.html

You'd think with that disapproving tone, that they wouldn't give this filth the oxygen of publicity. So just the five photos and a video then, including an odd picture where the girl has a black square where her modesty should be.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 8:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:14 pm
Posts: 3168
From the above:

Quote:
One has to hand it to the DM. It may act all moral and self-righteous but, by crikey, it comes up with the goods. Whether it's pretending to be a fashion spread, an update on a young actress or, as here, an article about an 'arty' calendar, there's always wall-to-wall undressed young tottie on this site. It's so good, I've even cancelled my top shelf subscription at the village newsagents.

- Colonel P. H. Whitherington, Little Feltshing, Dorset, 9/12/2011 19:10


:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 8:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:31 am
Posts: 760
Tom_MKUK wrote:
She's at it again: Veteran exhibitionist Kate Moss never tires of stripping for Pirelli calendar

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... endar.html

You'd think with that disapproving tone, that they wouldn't give this filth the oxygen of publicity. So just the five photos and a video then, including an odd picture where the girl has a black square where her modesty should be.


Disapproving, apart from the bit where they describe it as 'stunning'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:00 am
Posts: 6725
Location: Time Vortex
Quote:
Men's magazines describe women 'in the same way as rapists', say psychologists

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1gFTD8r48
Could the Mail resist the impulse to show us the front covers of these mags? Of course not.

_________________
Sick Left-wing Zealot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 11:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 6:43 am
Posts: 1853
Location: Dorset
The most intense taekwondo fight ever! Battling toddlers become a YouTube sensation (but nobody was hurt in the making of this film!)
Quote:

As viral YouTube videos go, it is a strong contender for the one with the most misleading title.
The footage entitled 'The most intense taekwondo fight ever!' may suggest a brutal no-holds-barred fight to the finish, but the reality is far less violent and much more hilarious.
The minute-long video, thought to have been filmed in Japan, shows two battling toddlers air-kicking at each other while adult spectators chuckle off-camera at the youngsters' exploits.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1gdzniFxE

Yes, whilst they clearly aren't touching each other they were at no more risk of fighting then those boys involved in the "cage fighting" incident in Preston last September. It had Mail readers foaming at the mouths despite the fact it was a heavily controlled bout of submissions where no striking took place. No worse than at a judo practise. Of course, people jump on the bandwagon because it's MMA with no understanding of the sport. Yet the comments for this article are saying the polar opposite.

_________________
My blog: https://stevenplrose.wordpress.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2011 3:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 6:10 pm
Posts: 4246
Location: That fancy London, with it's book learning. Sadly not being anywhere else..
"Youtube clip name makes people think kids are beating the crap out of eachother, but they aren't, and hete's the clip anyway."

Biggest load of non-story bollocks ever.

_________________
"Now get those trousers off before someone dies!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Sat Dec 17, 2011 6:32 pm 
Online

Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 2:07 am
Posts: 3348
Location: chesterfield
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2075449/Scandalous-cost-justice--861-night-lock-young-crime-suspects---650-stay-Ritz.html

The Mail is always keen to get law breakers locked up behind bars yet are soon moaning when they realise how much it cost to lock them up. The Mail also like the idea of private companies running public services yet it is clear in this case that the private company is charging a lot more to provide secure accommodation for young people on remand than public sector providers.

_________________
www.newshuddlines.blogspot.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail hypocrisy
PostPosted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 7:07 am 
satnav wrote:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2075449/Scandalous-cost-justice--861-night-lock-young-crime-suspects---650-stay-Ritz.html

The Mail is always keen to get law breakers locked up behind bars yet are soon moaning when they realise how much it cost to lock them up. The Mail also like the idea of private companies running public services yet it is clear in this case that the private company is charging a lot more to provide secure accommodation for young people on remand than public sector providers.


So what point do you think Paul Dacre is trying to make with this story?


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1054 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 ... 71  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group