Mail hypocrisy

Picklechu2 · **Joined:** Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:01 pm **Posts:** 640

No wonder it won't swipe!

office_tramp · **Posted:** Thu Nov 27, 2008 12:36 pm

Abernathy wrote:

office_tramp wrote:

hmmmm... the clitoris can't really be described as a 'button' it extends way beyond the bit that you can see/stimulate (the clitorial hood). The virgina is pretty useless as a 'fun zone' without it. I feel I need to be standing in front of a big diagram with a pointer for this. The so called G-spot is in reality probably just another part of the bunch of nerves that form the clitoris - but no one knows for sure. There is no such thing as a virginal orgasm. There are big orgasms and little orgasms, but all orgasms are clitorial.

I'm still puzzled. When I look up "virgina" on wikipedia it redirects me to the American state of Virginia. Do you mean vagina ? ???

Fails to spell own body parts correctly. Gets coat. :oops:

cycloon · **Joined:** Sun Jun 10, 2007 4:07 pm **Posts:** 3254

No such thing as vaginal orgasm? That's odd, I was under the impression certain things didn't affect the clitoris whilst doing other certain things ;o

office_tramp · **Posted:** Thu Nov 27, 2008 2:12 pm

cycloon wrote:

No such thing as vaginal orgasm? That's odd, I was under the impression certain things didn't affect the clitoris whilst doing other certain things ;o

I think I know what you are driving at...I think...? but as far as I know the vAginal orgasm was invented by Freud to make a woman who couldn't orgasm during penetrative sex feel inadaquate, require more psychoanalysis and thus keep him Viennese Whirls. Am I wrong?

Paul · **Posted:** Thu Nov 27, 2008 3:40 pm

Mr Mordon wrote:

sven945 wrote:

Prostate, credit card. I always get those things confused.

*back of the queue at Morrisons* 'For gods sake! That tosser at the front is paying for two items with his prostrate!'

Doctor: I will just insert my finger in your anus to check for an enlarged credit card.

Patient: Will it hurt?

Doctor: 27% APR

IanC · **Joined:** Fri Jun 02, 2006 6:30 pm **Posts:** 1404

Quote:

Avery Bullock: The last 20 years of your wife's memory have been erased.
Stan Smith: Well, go ahead and undo it.
Avery Bullock: Reverse brain erasing? Now, that's just science fiction.
CIA Temp: Kind of like the female orgasm.

Knew i had an American Dad! quote that fits this thread, sorta.

ClaireFry · **Posted:** Fri Nov 28, 2008 12:43 am

office_tramp wrote:

cycloon wrote:

No such thing as vaginal orgasm? That's odd, I was under the impression certain things didn't affect the clitoris whilst doing other certain things ;o

I think I know what you are driving at...I think...? but as far as I know the vAginal orgasm was invented by Freud to make a woman who couldn't orgasm during penetrative sex feel inadaquate, require more psychoanalysis and thus keep him Viennese Whirls. Am I wrong?

No you're right! I read about this in an ex's psychology books. Part of his course was about the psychology of sex - it was a good time to be with him! ;-)

cycloon · **Joined:** Sun Jun 10, 2007 4:07 pm **Posts:** 3254

office_tramp wrote:

cycloon wrote:

No such thing as vaginal orgasm? That's odd, I was under the impression certain things didn't affect the clitoris whilst doing other certain things ;o

I think I know what you are driving at...I think...? but as far as I know the vAginal orgasm was invented by Freud to make a woman who couldn't orgasm during penetrative sex feel inadaquate, require more psychoanalysis and thus keep him Viennese Whirls. Am I wrong?

I don't know, all I know is that penetrative sex seems to work for some when it doesn't appear any clitoral stimulation is occuring.

Rex · **Joined:** Fri Feb 29, 2008 2:39 am **Posts:** 57

Dave · **Joined:** Wed Aug 15, 2007 6:08 pm **Posts:** 180

I really don't understand Mail readers. This guy writes this comment about an article about The Godfather and he gets a negative rating, and his comment is first - the token swimming against the tide comment to show that at least one dissenting voice is let through.

I think it's disgusting that this film gets so much praise. It's full of violence and it projects a very poor Italian-America stereotype.

What kind of example is that to show to our kids?
Click to rate Rating 115- Anthony Deane, Cambridge, UK, 8/12/2008 14:50

Esqui · **Posted:** Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:51 pm

Wow, almost a month with no hypocrisy. But here's some more, from their guide on how to save money....
HOW YOU CAN SAVE A SMALL FORTUNE ON YOUR PHONE BILLS

All good advice, mostly. Then I read this and laughed for a small while:

Quote:

For your chance to be one of our winners, call 0905 197 0028. Calls cost 30p

I wonder if we could try this bit of advice:

Quote:

If you have to use an 0870 number to phone a company to sort out a problem of their making, insist they call you back.

Or find the number for the head office or sales department for the same company that starts with a standard landline prefix, dial that and ask to be transferred to the relevant department.

bairy · **Joined:** Tue May 08, 2007 1:40 pm **Posts:** 2807

0870 is 10p / min

0845 or local = 4.2p / min with 5p minimum

So you ring up local and ask to be transferred, thus racking up your bill on hold. Yeah, will save you millions. :roll:

Socket · **Joined:** Tue Sep 30, 2008 1:10 pm **Posts:** 291

For any that don't know about it: http://www.saynoto0870.com/

Smashing little site. You put in an 0870 number and it gives you the landline number.

AOB · **Posted:** Tue Sep 01, 2009 9:01 pm

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -year.html

Blackout Britain warning as Government predicts severe power shortages within a year

Cue doomongering tone and comments. So why do they moan about energy saving lightbulbs then? Surely that's a good thing, less energy being used, no?

From last week;

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... -sale.html

Ten days left to buy traditional lightbulbs: EU ban means only low-energy ones will be on sale

Fozzy · **Posted:** Thu Sep 10, 2009 1:38 pm

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... apart.html

DM getting terribly indignant because white Canadian girl is expected to follow the visa rules. I tried a couple of posts querying why they don't express the same indignation about non-white couples caught out by the same law, but they haven't seen the light of day. Strange, that.

Mail hypocrisy

Who is online