In the dock again!

Samanfur · **Posted:** Wed Oct 13, 2010 9:08 pm

The judge who the DM was trying to persuade that Gordon Taylor had no defamation case was unimpressed.

Tubby Isaacs · **Posted:** Fri Oct 22, 2010 11:22 pm

£20,000 couldn't be going to a better home!

http://www.thelondondailynews.com/chels ... -4647.html

Shame there isn't a fine payable to the exchequer for "cat fight" crap. Fights between men, that's totally different.

Paul · **Posted:** Sat Oct 23, 2010 12:25 pm

http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp ... =46186&c=1

Fozzy · **Posted:** Thu Mar 24, 2011 8:50 pm

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/ma ... ne-article

Samanfur · **Posted:** Wed Jul 20, 2011 2:51 pm

Daily Mail and Sun fined £15k for contempt of court

Quote:

Publishers of the Daily Mail and the Sun have been fined £15,000 each for contempt of court photographs of a defendant in a murder trial, holding a firearm, were published online.

The publishers of both newspapers were found guilty of contempt in March, after being taken to court by the attorney general, in a case believed to be the first of its kind given the online form of publication.

Yesterday the Attorney General's Office announced that in making the costs judgement the judges said "both newspapers have now taken steps to avoid repetition and apologised".

"They accepted that the publications were the result of a genuine mistake," the announcement says, adding the publishers were also required to pay the attorney general's costs of £28,117.

Paul · **Posted:** Wed Jul 20, 2011 9:08 pm

First picture: The 'party girl' nurse arrested on suspicion of murdering three patients after saline drips were spiked with deadly insulin

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/artic ... urder.html

So how do they justify this then in the light of that ruling?

Tom_UK · **Joined:** Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:14 pm **Posts:** 3168

Paul wrote:

First picture: The 'party girl' nurse arrested on suspicion of murdering three patients after saline drips were spiked with deadly insulin

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/artic ... urder.html

So how do they justify this then in the light of that ruling?

After the Chris Jefferies debacle, let's hope they hold off on the character assassinations until some hard evidence (or preferably a court verdict) comes out.

Paul · **Posted:** Wed Jul 20, 2011 9:55 pm

Does "Party Girl" imply loose morals and improper behaviour? Heaven forbid shagging and drinking!

SewerUrchin · **Posted:** Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:16 pm

You can tell she's a dodgy character, she appears to occasionally enjoy herself. :roll:

Paul · **Posted:** Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:26 pm

SewerUrchin wrote:

You can tell she's a dodgy character, she appears to occasionally enjoy herself. :roll:

Not masturbation as well?

moonkatt · **Posted:** Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:30 pm

Oh for fuck's sake. I bet they've been rubbing their hands with glee about this. Nice of GMP to release her name before she's even been charged of an offence. I hope she's found innocent, just to make them and the NMC look like a bunch of cunts for naming her.

Bit of free publicity and an angsty photo by DM phtographer for that actor no one's heard of before too.

Fozzy · **Posted:** Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm

Clearly they've learnt nothing from the sage of Joanna Yeates' landlord.

davidjay · **Joined:** Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:24 pm **Posts:** 3837

She's got a Facebook account and gets her hair done regularly. Don't bother with a trial, just throw the key away now.

Ebon Badger · **Posted:** Thu Jul 21, 2011 1:20 am

Oh god, I hope her pics are set to private now- if there's one of her and a couple of mates pretend pole dancing or making sexy duck face you can damn well guarantee that it'll make a ginormous two page spread with some hyperbolic waffle about the state of society today, and if she's innocent they sure as hell aren't gonna apologise to her- or anyone else in the photos with her, pixelated or no.

Kreuzberger · **Posted:** Thu Jul 21, 2011 4:29 pm

Fozzy wrote:

Clearly they've learnt nothing from the sage of Joanna Yeates' landlord.

Perhaps they are taking their cue from the case mentioned in Samanfur's post and have learned that a going rate of a poxy £15,000 represents good business for them.

In the dock again!

Who is online