It is currently Tue May 21, 2013 4:33 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7257 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274 ... 484  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 11:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 11:48 pm
Posts: 211
sporran wrote:
TonyHoyle wrote:
I call BS on those.. Typing 'inflatable life jackets' into google gets you sites about... inflatable life jackets.. No doubt similar for the others.

Depends whether or not you've made a conscious choice to go into the Google settings and change the little slider saying "How much explicit sexual content (web pages, images, and videos) should SafeSearch filter from your results?" to "No Filtering" I guess..


Well unless there's a specific mailite 'show me porn, whether I asked for it or not' setting that doesn't make any difference. Google is actually quite good at giving you what you asked for. And as you point out, safesearch means you won't get porn unless you specifically enable it anyway..

More likely he was searching for 'inflatable girlfriends' and his boss walked past, so the life jacket story is his cover.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 11:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 1:10 pm
Posts: 606
Location: London
He may have been logged into Google and so the search resaults would have been based on previous searches/sites he's visited.

_________________
"..The Daily Mail - not so much a newspaper as an idiot's guidebook issued in bite-size daily installments" Charlie Brooker


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 2:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 12:32 am
Posts: 718
Surely that anal warts one is a piss take? It is too perfectly crafted to be real.

The rest, though, are clearly those who have quite literally been caught red handed. They seem to have forgotten that there is a middle stage between typing something into a search engine and having a screen filled with porn, namely selecting the fucking site from the list.

By the way, is the human right to be a paedophile in the ECHR?

_________________
"Winterval is the favourite myth of the lunatic right who base most of their weekly columns on angry Brie-based dreams rather than looking out of their window." (Robin Ince)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 3:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:24 pm
Posts: 3819
Quote:
@- Kiernan , Manchester , 06/3/2012 14:24 - no, its quite the opposite. We have cultivated a machine that promulgates the fiction there is a pervert on every corner, like the witch hunt of Salem, and its all imagined. Common sense has been thrown out the window, giving free reign to the petty bureaucrats and looney left social engineers in the establishment.
- Internet Cynic, Lincoln, 6/3/2012 15:15


Because the witch hunters who attack paediatricians and hound anyone in the neighbourhood they consider to be not normal (and therefore peedos) are bound to be Guardian readers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 6:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 6:10 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: That fancy London, with it's book learning. Sadly not being anywhere else..
TonyHoyle wrote:
sporran wrote:
TonyHoyle wrote:
I call BS on those.. Typing 'inflatable life jackets' into google gets you sites about... inflatable life jackets.. No doubt similar for the others.

Depends whether or not you've made a conscious choice to go into the Google settings and change the little slider saying "How much explicit sexual content (web pages, images, and videos) should SafeSearch filter from your results?" to "No Filtering" I guess..


Well unless there's a specific mailite 'show me porn, whether I asked for it or not' setting that doesn't make any difference. Google is actually quite good at giving you what you asked for. And as you point out, safesearch means you won't get porn unless you specifically enable it anyway..

More likely he was searching for 'inflatable girlfriends' and his boss walked past, so the life jacket story is his cover.


I'd bet you any money that's exactly what happened, or they are simply too thick to have worked out the filter settings.

Mine is set a bit lower to prevent my Utorrent connections been blocked, but I've still never typed anything into Google that resulted in anything remotely pornographic coming up.

As for the married father (why does this matter?) why did he have to click on the files to discover what they were, surely the filenames were enough of a give away? (I for one have never heard of a singer or band releasing an album of songs all named after girls).

He knew what he was doing alright.

_________________
"Now get those trousers off before someone dies!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 8:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 11:36 am
Posts: 1431
Location: NORTHUMBERLAND
ezinra wrote:
Married father who 'accidentally' downloaded child porn instead of music is banned from being alone with his eight-year-old daughter

Image

Quote:
The council have imposed an indefinite ban - but it will be lifted if he is cleared.

I'm guessing if Nigel Robinson was black or a bit chavvy this would not be a sadface story.


Seriously words fail me

_________________
Blog...http://itsjustahobby.wordpress.com/

Soon, if we are not prudent, millions of people will be watching each other starve to death through expensive television sets. Nye Bevan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 9:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:14 pm
Posts: 3168
This could be middle-class bullshit or sadfacing. Not sure, but I'll put it here.

Caught in a gang war on the school run
One mother’s terrifying account of why her middle-class neighbourhood suddenly doesn’t feel so safe any more...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... l-run.html

Image

I suspect this particular journo might have seen this as an opportunity to bang on about how middle-class her family is and show off her kids' Hunter wellies. Probably a safe pass on PLU status here.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 9:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:50 pm
Posts: 2834
Tom_MKUK wrote:
I suspect this particular journo might have seen this as an opportunity to bang on about how middle-class her family is and show off her kids' Hunter wellies. Probably a safe pass on PLU status here.

Agreed. I couldn't help thinking that the caption to that particular photo summed things up quite nicely:
Quote:
The Brinkworths have now decided to move out to the countryside

It's unmoderated, so you can probably guess the type of comments it's attracting. Top-rated:
Quote:
The "whities" are slowly being intimidated out.
- Graham, Up North, 8/3/2012 6:06


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 9:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 2:07 am
Posts: 3349
Location: chesterfield
Given she says this happened when her eldest child was 5 and the baby was in a pram I think it's fair to assume she is recounting an event that took place about 2 years ago.

_________________
www.newshuddlines.blogspot.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 9:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 2:10 pm
Posts: 1592
shyamz wrote:
I'd bet you any money that's exactly what happened, or they are simply too thick to have worked out the filter settings.

Mine is set a bit lower to prevent my Utorrent connections been blocked, but I've still never typed anything into Google that resulted in anything remotely pornographic coming up.

As for the married father (why does this matter?) why did he have to click on the files to discover what they were, surely the filenames were enough of a give away? (I for one have never heard of a singer or band releasing an album of songs all named after girls).

He knew what he was doing alright.

I, for one, think "Horny_Slut_Gets_It_In_The_Ass.jpg" would be a great title for a song

_________________
I disagreed with the burglar’s policy, of tying me to a chair. But I did admire his convictions.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 9:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 2:10 pm
Posts: 1592
Messianic Trees wrote:
It's unmoderated, so you can probably guess the type of comments it's attracting. Top-rated:
Quote:
The "whities" are slowly being intimidated out.
- Graham, Up North, 8/3/2012 6:06

That's a real cunt-magnet.

Quote:
And we all know why this is happening but we're not allowed to say are we?
- Albert, Sick and stuck in the UK, 8/3/2012 7:36

_________________
I disagreed with the burglar’s policy, of tying me to a chair. But I did admire his convictions.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 10:03 am 
Offline
Lord of Flangebury-Under-Scythe
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:33 pm
Posts: 4278
There's a little any who fell in a hole in the Metro today who a sadface expert. I hope he ends up in the DM too.

_________________
MY COMMENTS ARE FROM THE HORSES MOUTH AND ARE ALL FACTS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 10:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 2:07 am
Posts: 3349
Location: chesterfield
Looks like Brinkworth has written a couple of articles for the Mail in the past where she went undercover.
She tried to expose Kabbalah and a fertility clinic that helped lesbians have babies.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-335620/Kabbalah-Undercover.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-144484/Call-motherhood.html

_________________
www.newshuddlines.blogspot.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 10:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 10:41 pm
Posts: 3383
Location: Elbonia
Tom_MKUK wrote:
I suspect this particular journo might have seen this as an opportunity to bang on about how middle-class her family is and show off her kids' Hunter wellies. Probably a safe pass on PLU status here.

If that eldest kid isn't called Tarquin then I'm going to be disappointed.

_________________
Changin' avatars like there's no tomorrow


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 11:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:59 pm
Posts: 2734
Location: N Wales Compound, EUKSSR
Althea wrote:
Tom_MKUK wrote:
I suspect this particular journo might have seen this as an opportunity to bang on about how middle-class her family is and show off her kids' Hunter wellies. Probably a safe pass on PLU status here.

If that eldest kid isn't called Tarquin then I'm going to be disappointed.

I call 'Harry', 'Justin' and 'Arthur'

_________________
Soppy anti-British, pro-crime, anti-education, pro-immigration, anti-family nonentity


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7257 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274 ... 484  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: newslove and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group