The sad faces of wronged Mail readers

Althea · **Posted:** Wed Apr 11, 2012 6:40 pm

And, if he has a car, 14 miles is... what? 10 minutes each way at 30mph? It gets him out of the house, too.

Malcolm Armsteen · **Posted:** Wed Apr 11, 2012 6:46 pm

SoulBoy · **Joined:** Fri Oct 08, 2010 1:42 pm **Posts:** 1622

Hit and miss today. This is very strong

You crust be joking: Shop-bought beef and onion pie had filthy dishcloth baked inside

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1rqDNgLRo

The mother-of-three again declined the offer of compensation, adding: 'We’re scarred now. We’re not eating pie ever again."

But I am seething over how truly shit this one is, not a SadFace amongst the lot of them...

Mother left fuming after cinema bosses demand she buys 10-week-old son a ticket

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1rqEHe6ov

2/10 - and that is for getting the cinema and in the background and the upskirt dwarf photographer taking the pic.

Silkyman · **Joined:** Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:31 am **Posts:** 758

I'm sure the other people in the theatre would have been delighted to be sat near your baby if he decided he wanted milk, or changing, or wasn't happy or any of the other reasons that babies start to cry.

FFS. Who takes a baby to the cinema!

Althea · **Posted:** Thu Apr 12, 2012 6:40 pm

Nice of the pie woman to keep the pie around.

Malcolm Armsteen · **Posted:** Thu Apr 12, 2012 6:48 pm

If that baby is 10 weeks old I'm Kate Moss's tits. He's got boots on! And he doesn't exactly fit into that papoose, either.

So presumably either the story took place some time ago and the snapper took the pictures recently and insisted that the child be forced into a papoose (despite almost being old enough to be eligible for workfare), or the story's a crock and the child is old enough to need a ticket.

Carlos The Badger · **Posted:** Thu Apr 12, 2012 7:38 pm

Malcolm Armsteen wrote:

So presumably either the story took place some time ago and the snapper took the pictures recently and insisted that the child be forced into a papoose (despite almost being old enough to be eligible for workfare), or the story's a crock and the child is old enough to need a ticket.

We think the latter, M'Lord.

shyamz · **Posted:** Thu Apr 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Silkyman wrote:

I'm sure the other people in the theatre would have been delighted to be sat near your baby if he decided he wanted milk, or changing, or wasn't happy or any of the other reasons that babies start to cry.

FFS. Who takes a baby to the cinema!

The same type of woman who takes an obviously newborn baby into the Queen musical We Will Rock You about ten years ago, at a time when news reports into dangerous sound levels in west end shows started appearing on the news.

They have no damn sense.

McSnark · **Posted:** Fri Apr 13, 2012 6:44 am

Definitely fake. Plus, she's more "the smug face of wronged Mail readers". Ban that filth!

Tom_UK · **Joined:** Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:14 pm **Posts:** 3168

McSnark wrote:

Definitely fake. Plus, she's more "the smug face of wronged Mail readers". Ban that filth!

The papoose raises strong suspicions that she could be a Guardianista who has infiltrated the Mail.

Fozzy · **Posted:** Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:24 am

shyamz wrote:

Silkyman wrote:

I'm sure the other people in the theatre would have been delighted to be sat near your baby if he decided he wanted milk, or changing, or wasn't happy or any of the other reasons that babies start to cry.

FFS. Who takes a baby to the cinema!

The same type of woman who takes an obviously newborn baby into the Queen musical We Will Rock You about ten years ago, at a time when news reports into dangerous sound levels in west end shows started appearing on the news.

They have no damn sense.

To be fair, this was a special children's showing. Anyone who has ever suffered the hell of these showings knows that the level of chaos is such that a small baby crying would really make no difference whatsoever.

ezinra · **Posted:** Fri Apr 13, 2012 5:55 pm

Frail OAP, 89, kicked out of pub whilst celebrating her birthday for flouting no hat policy with knitted beret

A low score. The pensioner angle had potential, but her complaint was genuine and she doesn't seem cut out for sadfacing.

About a million comments saying:

Quote:

She would not have been asked to remove a hijab.

- Howard the 1st, London, UK., 13/4/2012 13:36 Rating (0)

Arnold · **Posted:** Fri Apr 13, 2012 6:10 pm

Quote:

'Dead' hamster found running around garden after being buried in a box and digging himself out of grave

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1rwQCe4mc

daveinbrum · **Posted:** Fri Apr 13, 2012 6:35 pm

IPH isn't convinced on the hamster story:

Quote:

I will believe it is the same hamster, and not another with the same coloration, when they carefully dig up the plastic tub and reveal that tub to be empty and also show the tunnel the little animal made to get out from that depth. Whatever they believe happened, only doing this will provide empirical evidence in support of this claim.
- IPH, Headley Down, UK, 13/4/2012 17:45

Silkyman · **Joined:** Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:31 am **Posts:** 758

ezinra wrote:

Frail OAP, 89, kicked out of pub whilst celebrating her birthday for flouting no hat policy with knitted beret

A low score. The pensioner angle had potential, but her complaint was genuine and she doesn't seem cut out for sadfacing.

About a million comments saying:

Quote:

She would not have been asked to remove a hijab.

Similar happened to me and the wife a while back. Although without the health issue causing the hat wearing.

Apparently they had banned hats because unsavoury types had been coming in in caps, causing trouble and then getting away with it because you couldn't see their faces. The issue was that later when someone who wasn't a dick came in in a hat and wasn't asked to take it off, the same group saw this and started kicking off outside at the double standards.

Perhaps this is just some little hitler with a headcovering phobia and perhaps it was the same sort of situation. If so, you can't blame the landlord for not wanting a brick through his window.

- Howard the 1st, London, UK., 13/4/2012 13:36 Rating (0)

The sad faces of wronged Mail readers

Who is online