It is currently Sat May 18, 2013 9:29 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7233 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306 ... 483  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 6:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 10:41 pm
Posts: 3383
Location: Elbonia
And, if he has a car, 14 miles is... what? 10 minutes each way at 30mph? It gets him out of the house, too.

_________________
Changin' avatars like there's no tomorrow


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 6:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 22873
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
Yup.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 4:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 1:42 pm
Posts: 1622
Hit and miss today. This is very strong

You crust be joking: Shop-bought beef and onion pie had filthy dishcloth baked inside

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1rqDNgLRo

Image

The mother-of-three again declined the offer of compensation, adding: 'We’re scarred now. We’re not eating pie ever again."

But I am seething over how truly shit this one is, not a SadFace amongst the lot of them...

Mother left fuming after cinema bosses demand she buys 10-week-old son a ticket

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1rqEHe6ov

Image

2/10 - and that is for getting the cinema and in the background and the upskirt dwarf photographer taking the pic.

_________________
I'd rather shoot Paul Dacre than anyone else in the country- Colin Dexter. A direct quote from the Radio Times m'learned friends


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 5:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:31 am
Posts: 758
I'm sure the other people in the theatre would have been delighted to be sat near your baby if he decided he wanted milk, or changing, or wasn't happy or any of the other reasons that babies start to cry.

FFS. Who takes a baby to the cinema!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 6:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 10:41 pm
Posts: 3383
Location: Elbonia
Nice of the pie woman to keep the pie around.

_________________
Changin' avatars like there's no tomorrow


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 6:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 22873
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
If that baby is 10 weeks old I'm Kate Moss's tits. He's got boots on! And he doesn't exactly fit into that papoose, either.

So presumably either the story took place some time ago and the snapper took the pictures recently and insisted that the child be forced into a papoose (despite almost being old enough to be eligible for workfare), or the story's a crock and the child is old enough to need a ticket.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 7:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 2:30 pm
Posts: 5155
Location: Underpants
Malcolm Armsteen wrote:
So presumably either the story took place some time ago and the snapper took the pictures recently and insisted that the child be forced into a papoose (despite almost being old enough to be eligible for workfare), or the story's a crock and the child is old enough to need a ticket.


We think the latter, M'Lord.

_________________
Si vas a plagiar noticias, no uses un sitio de noticias falsas como fuente.


Last edited by Carlos The Badger on Thu Feb 31, 2021 18:60 am, edited 666 times in total.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 10:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 6:10 pm
Posts: 4234
Location: That fancy London, with it's book learning. Sadly not being anywhere else..
Silkyman wrote:
I'm sure the other people in the theatre would have been delighted to be sat near your baby if he decided he wanted milk, or changing, or wasn't happy or any of the other reasons that babies start to cry.

FFS. Who takes a baby to the cinema!


The same type of woman who takes an obviously newborn baby into the Queen musical We Will Rock You about ten years ago, at a time when news reports into dangerous sound levels in west end shows started appearing on the news.

They have no damn sense.

_________________
"Now get those trousers off before someone dies!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 6:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 7:02 am
Posts: 307
Location: Bonny Scotland. Och Aye The Frakking Noo.
Definitely fake. Plus, she's more "the smug face of wronged Mail readers". Ban that filth!

_________________
You couldn't make it up...that's what Littledick's for!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 8:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:14 pm
Posts: 3168
McSnark wrote:
Definitely fake. Plus, she's more "the smug face of wronged Mail readers". Ban that filth!


The papoose raises strong suspicions that she could be a Guardianista who has infiltrated the Mail.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 5:59 pm
Posts: 5486
Location: London
shyamz wrote:
Silkyman wrote:
I'm sure the other people in the theatre would have been delighted to be sat near your baby if he decided he wanted milk, or changing, or wasn't happy or any of the other reasons that babies start to cry.

FFS. Who takes a baby to the cinema!


The same type of woman who takes an obviously newborn baby into the Queen musical We Will Rock You about ten years ago, at a time when news reports into dangerous sound levels in west end shows started appearing on the news.

They have no damn sense.

To be fair, this was a special children's showing. Anyone who has ever suffered the hell of these showings knows that the level of chaos is such that a small baby crying would really make no difference whatsoever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 5:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 5:43 pm
Posts: 3855
Location: Chuffing Barsetshire
Frail OAP, 89, kicked out of pub whilst celebrating her birthday for flouting no hat policy with knitted beret

Image

A low score. The pensioner angle had potential, but her complaint was genuine and she doesn't seem cut out for sadfacing.

About a million comments saying:
Quote:
She would not have been asked to remove a hijab.

- Howard the 1st, London, UK., 13/4/2012 13:36 Rating (0)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 6:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:00 am
Posts: 6712
Location: Time Vortex
Quote:
'Dead' hamster found running around garden after being buried in a box and digging himself out of grave

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1rwQCe4mc
Image

_________________
Sick Left-wing Zealot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 6:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 6:40 pm
Posts: 1015
Location: Birmingham, UK
IPH isn't convinced on the hamster story:

Quote:
I will believe it is the same hamster, and not another with the same coloration, when they carefully dig up the plastic tub and reveal that tub to be empty and also show the tunnel the little animal made to get out from that depth. Whatever they believe happened, only doing this will provide empirical evidence in support of this claim.
- IPH, Headley Down, UK, 13/4/2012 17:45


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The sad faces of wronged Mail readers
PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 8:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:31 am
Posts: 758
ezinra wrote:
Frail OAP, 89, kicked out of pub whilst celebrating her birthday for flouting no hat policy with knitted beret

Image

A low score. The pensioner angle had potential, but her complaint was genuine and she doesn't seem cut out for sadfacing.

About a million comments saying:
Quote:
She would not have been asked to remove a hijab.


Similar happened to me and the wife a while back. Although without the health issue causing the hat wearing.

Apparently they had banned hats because unsavoury types had been coming in in caps, causing trouble and then getting away with it because you couldn't see their faces. The issue was that later when someone who wasn't a dick came in in a hat and wasn't asked to take it off, the same group saw this and started kicking off outside at the double standards.

Perhaps this is just some little hitler with a headcovering phobia and perhaps it was the same sort of situation. If so, you can't blame the landlord for not wanting a brick through his window.


- Howard the 1st, London, UK., 13/4/2012 13:36 Rating (0)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7233 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306 ... 483  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group