Mail top trumps

Timbo · **Posted:** Sat Oct 08, 2011 1:28 pm

shyamz wrote:

Generaly it's down to the age and whiteness (and supposed upstanding-ness in the community) of person involved.

And he shot a chav - he's well safe I'd say.

Wasn't he released without charge as it was considered reasonable self defence? Expect this to be abused fully in the coming year or so.

Yep. We may well yet see this turned into 'Hard-working businessman forced to grow cannabis by the economic mess left behind by Labour'

Arnold · **Posted:** Sat Oct 08, 2011 1:41 pm

No. That was someone who stabbed a burglar with his own knife a few weeks back.
An earlier version of the Mail story said that White repaired antique clocks, church clocks, etc. Probably profitable.

DTR · **Posted:** Sat Oct 08, 2011 1:49 pm

Arnold wrote:

No. That was someone who stabbed a burglar with his own knife a few weeks back.
An earlier version of the Mail story said that White repaired antique clocks, church clocks, etc. Probably profitable.

Not now the BBC have BANNED Christianity !!!onethousandonehundredandeleven!!

Malcolm Armsteen · **Posted:** Sat Oct 08, 2011 2:40 pm

Different case.

shyamz · **Posted:** Sun Oct 09, 2011 8:57 pm

Arnold wrote:

No. That was someone who stabbed a burglar with his own knife a few weeks back.
An earlier version of the Mail story said that White repaired antique clocks, church clocks, etc. Probably profitable.

I saw a couple of articles about the clock bloke and he was indeed been hailed as someone previously seen as a pillar of the community. The Express naturaly. I do think he will become the next Mr Martin, the gentleman vigilantie (only a bit richer than a farmer).

Arnold · **Posted:** Sun Oct 09, 2011 9:30 pm

He's been charged. As has someone else, but with an odd combination of charges.

Quote:

The other man has been charged with three counts of possessing ammunition for a firearm without a certificate, production of a class B controlled drug (cannabis), aggravated burglary of a dwelling with intent and possessing ammunition for a firearm when prohibited to do so for five years.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-he ... r-15230951

davidjay · **Joined:** Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:24 pm **Posts:** 3938

'Odd' will sum up the entire case when the full facts emerge.

Gourami · **Joined:** Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:51 pm **Posts:** 2005

I'm not making sense of this. Who owns the weed? Who knows who?

Arnold · **Posted:** Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:29 am

Normally the charges indicate what the police think happened, but not here.

ezinra · **Posted:** Thu Nov 10, 2011 7:13 pm

I'll admit I'm not sure what top trumps are, but I think this goes in here:

Convicted paedophile's trial abandoned after he tells court 'indecent' videos of children were recorded from terrestrial television

Paedo acquitted
— vs —
Too much depraved filth on tv

Since the wank-material was all taken from "films any member of the public could have seen", the more simple-minded of the Mailites blame civilisation:

Quote:

It is telling and deeply frightening that the images came from a so-called 'mainstream' source. It is indicative of just how depraved modern etertainment is becoming.

- Ben Russell-Gough, London, UK, 10/11/2011 10:44 Rating 26

Others are green-arrowed for attacking the judicial system:

Quote:

This is malicious persecution. He should sue for harrassment. To be inprisoned for nine months for watching television is beyond outrageous.

- Trudi, Worcs, 10/11/2011 11:07 Rating 122

The one person with half a brain inevitably gets red-arrowed:

Quote:

What planet are you on Trudi? Each clip is perfectly innocuous in the context of the film it was in. Extract a clip and piece it together with numerous clips from other films and the context of watching them together is changed completely. This time a wierd, sinister context. If you don't understand that there's something wrong with you.

- Martin I, Reading, no longer GB, 10/11/2011 12:42 Rating 3

shyamz · **Posted:** Thu Nov 10, 2011 11:25 pm

Terrestrial? Wait for it, moving over to the Mail Vs The BBC thread.

All this shows is that images of children don't have to be overtly sexual in adult terms to interest guys like that. This must confuse many Mail readers.

SoulBoy · **Joined:** Fri Oct 08, 2010 1:42 pm **Posts:** 1649

Gays Vs. The BBC

'Gay people deserve better than the BBC's pathetic attempts to represent us': George Michael slams EastEnders gay storyline

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... z1dPduldMe

Top rated comments are of the throat ramming variety

Killer Whale · **Posted:** Fri Nov 11, 2011 5:04 pm

SoulBoy wrote:

Gays Vs. The BBC

'Gay people deserve better than the BBC's pathetic attempts to represent us': George Michael slams EastEnders gay storyline

Bloody hell. Does EastEnders (mis)represent anyone at all in anything but the most unlikely and bizarre fashion?

oboogie · **Posted:** Fri Nov 11, 2011 5:13 pm

SoulBoy wrote:

Gays Vs. The BBC

'Gay people deserve better than the BBC's pathetic attempts to represent us': George Michael slams EastEnders gay storyline

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... z1dPduldMe

Top rated comments are of the throat ramming variety

Those seem to have been removed now.
I can see lots of personal abuse aimed at George Michael however.
It seems the Mailities don't hate the BBC half as much as the Mail thinks.

AOB · **Posted:** Fri Nov 11, 2011 6:02 pm

Of course the Mail could never be accused of misrepresenting gay people and are well-placed on the moral high ground to take aim at the BBC.

Mail top trumps

Who is online