It is currently Fri May 24, 2013 9:12 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 676 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 ... 46  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: The NHS
PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2012 11:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11949
Location: East London
Nice one, Danny Boyle.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The NHS
PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2012 11:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 6:43 am
Posts: 1853
Location: Dorset
Tubby Isaacs wrote:
Nice one, Danny Boyle.


Indeed. Very well done.

_________________
My blog: https://stevenplrose.wordpress.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The NHS
PostPosted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 1:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 5:05 pm
Posts: 2466
Location: hove
new puritan wrote:
Didn't take long.

Image


QFT

i was slightly apprehensive about how that was going to be, and my dad bailed entirely, but when he gets up tomorrow he'll be chuffed to bits. i know i am.

_________________
i have an art blog: http://procrastinationathon.blogspot.com/
and a review blog: http://blindwithwoodenhands.blogspot.com/
double blog! what does it mean?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The NHS
PostPosted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 2:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:08 am
Posts: 7344
Tubby Isaacs wrote:
Nice one, Danny Boyle.


Freakin' awesome.

I'm waiting to see whether Mitt demands team USA boycott such an obvious hotbed of communism.

No really, I'm waiting for tomorrows jolly bike race.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The NHS
PostPosted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:49 pm
Posts: 10534
Location: Durham
Quote:
Louise Mensch‏@LouiseMensch

The best bit of the opening ceremony was the tribute to the NHS - says so much about PM that he protected & increased its budget :)

That's it, you lick that arse.

_________________
That subtle admixture of the absurd and the surreally plausible...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The NHS
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 12:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 11:04 pm
Posts: 711
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/ ... s-cleaning

Labour puts pressure on Lansley over nurses cleaning wards

In which Andrew "I don't accept that" Lansley decides that it probably isn't really happening, and even if it is it's all Labour's fault.

Contrary to the mailite wet dream, nurses aren't a one-stop shop for all ward maintenance and cleaning, and it is very worrying that patient's could be receiving sub-standard care because the nurses have to get the marigolds on. It's utterly ridiculous that hospitals should be left to sink or swim and effectively survive market forces, since one of the major metrics is going to be patient outcomes.

It's also entirely uneconomic to have nurses on ?27-32k cleaning as opposed to the cleaners on ?17-20k.

This utter sack of shit has completely vanished from politics since his filthy little bill got pushed through, and it's no wonder since he's incapable of holding debate or discussion on any matter. He's one of the main reasons I look forward to the next election.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The NHS
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:59 am
Posts: 12752
Location: Up my own arse.
Well the key point is that keeping a hospital clean is absolutely crucial to its safe operation. It isn't something that you can afford to cut corners on, and in may ways the role that the cleaning staff play is just about as important as the role of the nursing stff - the latter certainly could not carry out their core function without the former.

_________________
I'm a nasty, violent lefty. You cunt.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The NHS
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 5:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 2:40 pm
Posts: 325
Location: Night Desk
Winegums wrote:
This utter sack of shit has completely vanished from politics since his filthy little bill got pushed through, and it's no wonder since he's incapable of holding debate or discussion on any matter. He's one of the main reasons I look forward to the next election.


To be honest, after that bombshell opening ceremony, he probably can't wait to just jack it in, and go get his juicy one-week-a-year consultancy stipend for some vast multinational.

_________________
"...now, with a most inhuman cruelty, they who have put out the people’s eyes, reproach them of their blindness..."
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The NHS
PostPosted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 9:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 9:56 pm
Posts: 3777
Location: Gunchester
I see that nauseating little spiv Ali Parsa's been all over the media in the last week or so, first popping up on Newsnight and now singing his own praises in the Torygraph.

Quote:
“It’s all about bringing entrepreneurialism, ownership and a sense of engagement into health care,” says Parsa, pointing out that the company subsidiary delivering the health care is 49.9pc owned by hospital staff.

“We’re the largest partnership of doctors and nurses anywhere in the world outside the US, so we have many resources from across the UK to come and help.

“Today, our length of stay in hospital is 2.6 days on average for a joint replacement, compared with 5.6 days in February. That’s the best in the country, while Hinchingbrooke’s local health authority safety rating has gone from red in February to green.

“Clinically, the hospital is immensely improved. It just goes to show that if you let nurses and doctors on the front line dream the impossible and get together to take a sense of ownership and drive them within an entrepreneurial organisation, you can achieve quite a lot.”


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/news ... itals.html

Interesting. So how are Hinchingbrooke's finances looking these days?

Quote:
Hinchingbrooke Healthcare Trust made a £2.3m loss in the three months to the end of June and may need a cash injection later this financial year if it does not deliver on cost improvement plans.

The trust - the first in the UK to be franchised to a private operator - is now imposing strict controls on vacancies and non-pay expenditure as it tries to get back on track to make cost improvements of £9.9m this year.

A finance report to its board has revealed that it now only expects to deliver £6.5m of the savings originally targeted and has identified an additional £3.4m of new savings schemes to fill the gap. All recruitment will be scrutinised by the senior management group.

...

The trust finished the quarter with a deficit £0.65m greater than planned and warned that its cash balance could fall to under £1m by the end of September.

Delivery of cost improvements should push this balance up again in the second part of the year but the trust warns that any further slippage could mean it “may need to consider what access it has to loans and other cash injections to bridge the period”.


...ah.

http://www.hsj.co.uk/hsj-local/acute-tr ... 38.article

Oh, and the whole 'social enterprise' angle is bollocks as well.

Quote:
Circle has been described as a "John Lewis-style mutual" owned by its employees, but this could not be further from the truth.

In reality the company is majority controlled by hedge fund firm Circle Holdings, which is registered in the tax haven of Jersey and almost 95 per cent of its shares are in the hands of just six investors.

These include Odey European, Lansdowne, Balderton and BlueCrest funds headed by some of the most ruthless spivs and speculators who made millions by foreseeing the banking crisis.

Circle is also backed by City hedge funds run by Crispin Odey and Paul Ruddock, who have donated £790,000 to the Tory Party.

Its chief executive Ali Parsa is a former Goldman Sachs banker whose sole responsibility is to maximise profits for the above shareholders - he personally owns 5 per cent of shares in Circle Holdings.


http://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/cont ... ull/114990

_________________
Change does not roll in on the wheels of inevitability, but comes through continuous struggle.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The NHS
PostPosted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 10:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11949
Location: East London
There's a load of tripe about the hospital being a "basket case". Financially it was, but not clinically.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The NHS
PostPosted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 10:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 23081
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
Aren't we reaching the stage that only the financial efficiency of hospitals is said to count? We are losing our A&E, maternity and children's facilities on cost grounds, nothing to do with their use or clinical effectiveness.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The NHS
PostPosted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 10:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11949
Location: East London
I don't think so. Even the Mail will notice people going into private hospitals with a bad leg, and coming out with smallpox.

It's just that finance was the big problem with that hospital. As New Puritan shows, it still is.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The NHS
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 10:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 9:56 pm
Posts: 3777
Location: Gunchester
Some interesting figures from BUPA out this week:

Quote:
The UK’s biggest health insurer has warned that treatment costs have become so expensive that hundreds of thousands of people are abandoning private medical cover.

Bupa said on Wednesday that it had lost 142,000 customers in the UK – 5 per cent of its total – during the first half of the year compared with 2011, blaming in large part a lack of competition between hospitals for ramping up costs.

Other health insurers had endured a similar exodus, Bupa said, with the overall number of people who have individual medical insurance cover now standing at its lowest level since 1995.

Individuals from all demographics were turning their back on the private sector in favour of the NHS, Bupa maintained.

The figures come as the Competition Commission begins an investigation into the private healthcare market. The Office of Fair Trading earlier this year said it had uncovered evidence that suggested some practices in the sector “prevent, restrict or distort competition”.

The OFT has pointed to a limited number of big healthcare private providers – as well as health insurers – and highlighted “pockets of particularly high concentration” in some areas.


http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/8228293c-e167 ... z232QKhTS1

Might go some way to explaining why private vultures are so desperate to get their teeth into the NHS - lots of easy money courtesy of the state to be hoovered up.

_________________
Change does not roll in on the wheels of inevitability, but comes through continuous struggle.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The NHS
PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 4:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 9:56 pm
Posts: 3777
Location: Gunchester
Another private healthcare triumph.

Quote:
Hospital staff in Buckinghamshire have said they are not being paid in full amid fears of redundancy and that the hospital may close.

The private Royal Buckinghamshire Hospital in Aylesbury informed staff they would receive 20% of their July salary, workers told BBC Oxford.

Speaking anonymously, they said the private hospital admitted it was in a "serious financial situation".

The hospital said it was in consultation with staff.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-be ... s-19193067

_________________
Change does not roll in on the wheels of inevitability, but comes through continuous struggle.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The NHS
PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2012 10:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:59 am
Posts: 12752
Location: Up my own arse.
Tip of the iceberg, I fear:

http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2008/02/anne_milton_dr/

_________________
I'm a nasty, violent lefty. You cunt.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 676 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 ... 46  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group