It is currently Wed May 22, 2013 11:52 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Rape (and the reporting of)
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 3:23 pm
Posts: 725
Sky News accidentally names Ched Evans rape victim

http://www.newstatesman.com/broadcast/2012/04/sky-news-accidentally-names-ched-evans-rape-victim


Quote:
In a statement, the broadcaster said that it would "like to apologise to the victim and her family for any distress caused."


Which is very big of them but isn't this illegal?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rape (and the reporting of)
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 6:43 am
Posts: 1853
Location: Dorset
Squeaker wrote:
Sky News accidentally names Ched Evans rape victim

http://www.newstatesman.com/broadcast/2012/04/sky-news-accidentally-names-ched-evans-rape-victim


Quote:
In a statement, the broadcaster said that it would "like to apologise to the victim and her family for any distress caused."


Which is very big of them but isn't this illegal?


The police have launched an inquiry into this.

_________________
My blog: https://stevenplrose.wordpress.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rape (and the reporting of)
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 3:23 pm
Posts: 725
smod wrote:
Squeaker wrote:
Sky News accidentally names Ched Evans rape victim

http://www.newstatesman.com/broadcast/2012/04/sky-news-accidentally-names-ched-evans-rape-victim


Quote:
In a statement, the broadcaster said that it would "like to apologise to the victim and her family for any distress caused."


Which is very big of them but isn't this illegal?


The police have launched an inquiry into this.


Good, if plod are also investigating Twitter & Facebook users they need to be even handed about applying the law.
I'd give Sky the benefit of the doubt, but I can imagine the Mail/Telegraph response if the BBC had made the same mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rape (and the reporting of)
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 3:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 11:18 am
Posts: 396
smod wrote:
The offending tweet has since been removed. Yet, another footballer comes out in defence of Ched Evans.

http://yfrog.com/c834lvj

I don't see the problem with that tweet. Its a fact some girls do like causing problems for footballers. However it was wrong of one of his other team mates to name the girl (not sure if this was the same player)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rape (and the reporting of)
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 4:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 11:09 am
Posts: 2419
Location: Redhill, Surrey
It's basically saying she was asking for it and made it all up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rape (and the reporting of)
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 4:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 11:18 am
Posts: 396
lord_kobel wrote:
It's basically saying she was asking for it and made it all up.

That wasn't the impression I got from the screengrab . Sounded like the guy was saying Ched Evans was a prat (which he is)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rape (and the reporting of)
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 4:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 6:43 am
Posts: 1853
Location: Dorset
TOONARMY wrote:
lord_kobel wrote:
It's basically saying she was asking for it and made it all up.

That wasn't the impression I got from the screengrab . Sounded like the guy was saying Ched Evans was a prat (which he is)


But the guy is conflating an innocent rape victim with a minority of women who look to exploit footballers for money (kiss n' tell etc). That's a very ignorant and worrying attitude.

_________________
My blog: https://stevenplrose.wordpress.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rape (and the reporting of)
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 4:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 11:09 am
Posts: 2419
Location: Redhill, Surrey
Not to mention he decribes the rape as "30 mins of pleasure"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rape (and the reporting of)
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 4:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 11:18 am
Posts: 396
smod wrote:
TOONARMY wrote:
lord_kobel wrote:
It's basically saying she was asking for it and made it all up.

That wasn't the impression I got from the screengrab . Sounded like the guy was saying Ched Evans was a prat (which he is)


But the guy is conflating an innocent rape victim with a minority of women who look to exploit footballers for money (kiss n' tell etc). That's a very ignorant and worrying attitude.

Fair enough I see what you mean now


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rape (and the reporting of)
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 4:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11881
Location: East London
I posted this on the cunt's own thread.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/brend ... ape-trials


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rape (and the reporting of)
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 5:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 3:23 pm
Posts: 725
'Comments are closed'

Was it something you said?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rape (and the reporting of)
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 5:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 11:36 am
Posts: 1431
Location: NORTHUMBERLAND
Squeaker wrote:
Sky News accidentally names Ched Evans rape victim

http://www.newstatesman.com/broadcast/2012/04/sky-news-accidentally-names-ched-evans-rape-victim


Quote:
In a statement, the broadcaster said that it would "like to apologise to the victim and her family for any distress caused."


Which is very big of them but isn't this illegal?


Christ on a fecking bike...Distraction from Murdoch perhaps?

_________________
Blog...http://itsjustahobby.wordpress.com/

Soon, if we are not prudent, millions of people will be watching each other starve to death through expensive television sets. Nye Bevan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rape (and the reporting of)
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 5:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 2:30 pm
Posts: 5171
Location: Underpants
storygirl wrote:
Christ on a fecking bike...Distraction from Murdoch perhaps?


I would say so. And the Met coming out with that Maddie stuff today also looks suspicious.

_________________
Si vas a plagiar noticias, no uses un sitio de noticias falsas como fuente.


Last edited by Carlos The Badger on Thu Feb 31, 2021 18:60 am, edited 666 times in total.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rape (and the reporting of)
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 8:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11881
Location: East London
Squeaker wrote:
'Comments are closed'

Was it something you said?


Judging by some of the cunts who frequent the site, they were probably expecting their readers to name rape victims themselves.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rape (and the reporting of)
PostPosted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 10:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 6:43 am
Posts: 1853
Location: Dorset
Tell me again, why should we have any faith in the Met Police?

Met police urge rape victims to come forward as new detective arrested

Quote:
The Metropolitan police are urging scores of women from north London who have been raped or sexually abused to come forward if they feel their cases were not taken seriously, after arresting another detective in its flagship sex crime unit Sapphire for allegedly falsifying documents.

The arrest stems from one of three investigations into failings in the unit, which could have left rapists at large.

The detective constable – who has not been named – was arrested on Friday on suspicion of perverting the course of justice. Colleagues raised allegations that he had altered crime documents by inserting statements from the Crown Prosecution Service and senior officers to indicate that no charges were to be brought in rape and sexual abuse cases when no such decision had been made.

The officer was involved in 63 cases – 26 of which are continuing, and 37 in which he claimed the inquiry was completed. Each case is being reviewed and at least two women have already been told by detectives that issues have come to light which mean the original decision has now been changed, and the investigation is taking a different course.

The arrest comes less than a week after another former Sapphire officer, Ryan Coleman-Farrow, 30, was charged with 13 counts of misconduct in a public office after concerns were raised about the way he conducted crime investigations and allegations that he had also falsified statements and reports. Coleman-Farrow was dismissed from the Met in April 2011. It is alleged that he wrote letters to sexual assault and rape victims telling them their investigations had been shelved, when no such decision has been made.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/jun/0 ... e-arrested

Incredible blog piece by a very brave woman.

Quote:
Today I saw a pig fly. It was silhouetted in front of a blue moon and had been catapulted up there by a unicorn. And none of it blew my mind just as much as the news that the Metropolitan Police are admitting they need their McPherson moment because their handling of sex crimes has been so appallingly bad for years.

I could hardly breathe for reading this article when it popped up on Twitter on Friday night. It was too much for me to take in. Part of me was furious that such cases are still prevalent. Part of me was overwhelmed that the Met are being upfront and asking for evidence. And the rest of me was flooded with emotion to be proved that I was right, I am not a liar and I did deserve better.

Seven years ago I made a complaint against the Westminster Sapphire Unit because I was so unhappy about how they had handled my rape in August 2004. I had no idea what I was doing when I started it. I assumed it would be a bit like writing to British Gas and giving off stink, but probably without the M&S vouchers at the end of it. Traumatised, shell shocked, naive and not entirely sure what I wanted or needed, I sat down and wrote them a letter detailing every single issue I had with my case. It took days to write, overwhelmed me utterly and arrived with them exactly one year to the day that I reported the rape. It triggered off more than I ever thought I would cope with and as I detailed here, it would last almost 4 years before it was concluded. It was the hardest and stupidest thing I have ever done.

And I'd be lying if I said I'd done it for the greater good of feminism or other women. I didn't. I did it for me to start with and then by the time it really got rolling, I'm not even sure I wanted to do it for me but I was in too deep and was too stubborn to back out then. I think I thought that the police admitting they were wrong was going to undo the original attack. I never had any grand plan to stand up for anyone other than myself. I had to say that I worth being taken seriously otherwise I'd never believe it again and I'd never move on with my life.

I have no idea why other victims decide to make complaints. Maybe they have a bigger sense of collective responsibility? Maybe they are just grasping at something to stop them drowning as they try to find their way back from sexual violence? Maybe it makes them feel in control? I'm not sure it matters what the reason was, but that they stuck it out and increased the number of voices to be heard to a point where the attitude in the Met has changed so much. When I complained, in fact even when I wrote that blog post last year, I didn't forsee the Met being even the tiniest bit transparent.

After all when my officers destroyed evidence in case and faked the paperwork and lied through their fucking teeth for months on end to me and their superiors, nothing much happened. The original officers got 'words of advice' and everyone else got a bollocking, but the Superintendent who forged my signature repeatedly to try and illegally end the complaint got off scot free and none of the officers who phoned me at 4am to put the frighteners on me saw any consequences. And it took almost 3 years to convince them I wasn't lying and make them actually look into the case properly in the first place which messed with my head no end. The mixture of hostility and ambivalence had me sure they would never really change and that they'd just continue to pay lip service.


http://gherkinette.blogspot.co.uk/2012/ ... ather.html

_________________
My blog: https://stevenplrose.wordpress.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group