It is currently Wed May 22, 2013 9:33 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2803 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 ... 187  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:07 am
Posts: 2261
Location: Lancashire
Gove is apparently planning a Q&A session via Twitter. Hopefully, it'll be slightly better managed than Ed Miliband's - even though it'll still most likely be a bearpit, anyway.

_________________
"If the past really is a foreign country, I'm surprised that 'The Daily Mail' would want to live there.” - Roger Quimbly


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 3:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11881
Location: East London
Where's Mossbourne's budget? And GSCEs listed by subject? [/less than 140 characters]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 4:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11881
Location: East London
Nice insight into Gove and team:

www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/jan/27 ... on-advised

Pretty obvious conflict of interest.

Some unnamed spokesman comes back with "You want Jews attacked? And this on Holocaust Day"

Yeah, because that was the point being made.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 4:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 22980
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
I got into a Twitter argument with a reporter from the Jewish Chronicle over this - in the end she implied that I was anti-Semitic because I said Gove had to follow proper financial procedures...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 5:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 11:04 pm
Posts: 710
Sorry tubs, I can't seem to find the story on the website and the link isn't working, could you relink or give me an idea what to search for?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 5:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:50 pm
Posts: 2838
Was it this story?

According to "professional Gumby" Toby Young this was "a spectacular own goal" for the Guardian.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 5:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 22980
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
I think the Guardian may have taken the story down. What I read was that Gove had been part-funding security for Jewish schools (sensible, probably necessary) but had been doing it in ways that were quite dodgy. It was given as another example of how he and his SPAds at the DfE don't follow due procedures. I couldn't see anything disrespectful in it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 6:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11881
Location: East London
The story was indeed the one Messianic Trees says:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012 ... on-advised

Typically, the Guardian bungled a bit of it and they've clarified.

Quote:
This article was amended on 27 January 2012. The original may have implied that the Community Security Trust retained cash or employed school security guards.


That wasn't too important though. The point, as Malcolm says, the cavalier approach to doing anything properly.

Young as always tries to be clever:

Quote:
The CST doesn't itself receive any donations; rather, it distributes the money it receives to various security companies, none of which Michael Gove is on the board of.


No-one said Gove was getting money out of it. Good cause indeed. No doubt there were other good causes competing with it. That's why someone else takes the decision.

Quote:
their knee-jerk opposition to public service reform and their willingness to regurgitate anti-Semitic propaganda.


Despite the fact no-one did that.

And they aren't relying on David Miller. This is in the public domain:

Quote:
Faith schools make a fantastic contribution to our education system and none more so than Jewish faith schools, which teach children the importance of ethos, values and a belief in social justice.

Children and staff at these schools should feel safe at school and able to learn in an environment free from any anti-semitic or racist threats. That is why I have secured funding of up to £2 million for 2010-11 to be made to the 39 schools via the Community Security Trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:08 am
Posts: 7330
Messianic Trees wrote:
Was it this story?

According to "professional Gumby" Toby Young this was "a spectacular own goal" for the Guardian.


Parental advisory: Includes pictures of both these turd-faced cunts.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 12:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11881
Location: East London
And quotes Harry's Place. Miller is on record as saying the person who put the link up no longer works on the site. So not quite as they imply then.

There's quite an irony about the neo-nazi they mention. He indeed seems increasingly dodgy (though he had academic admirers earlier in his career).

Quote:
In January 2010, MacDonald began acting as director of the newly-founded political party American Third Position, which declares America a white Christian nation and advocates for limiting "non-white" immigration into the United States. A statement on their website reads, "If current demographic trends persist, European-Americans will become a minority in America in only a few decades time. The American Third Position will not allow this to happen. To safeguard our identity and culture, and to secure an American future for our people, we will immediately put an indefinite moratorium on all immigration."


Sounds like he'd fit right in on the Telegraph.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:24 pm
Posts: 3823
Tubby Isaacs wrote:
And quotes Harry's Place. Miller is on record as saying the person who put the link up no longer works on the site. So not quite as they imply then.

There's quite an irony about the neo-nazi they mention. He indeed seems increasingly dodgy (though he had academic admirers earlier in his career).

Quote:
In January 2010, MacDonald began acting as director of the newly-founded political party American Third Position, which declares America a white Christian nation and advocates for limiting "non-white" immigration into the United States. A statement on their website reads, "If current demographic trends persist, European-Americans will become a minority in America in only a few decades time. The American Third Position will not allow this to happen. To safeguard our identity and culture, and to secure an American future for our people, we will immediately put an indefinite moratorium on all immigration."


Sounds like he'd fit right in on the Telegraph.


Would that be the America where European-Americans have been a majority for, oooh, about three of the past 135 centuries?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 9:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11881
Location: East London
That's the one. Right bollocks. But a Telegraph column or two in it, I should think.

On an unrelated matter, here's something interesting

http://www.islingtontribune.com/news/20 ... ottom-spot

Quote:
A CONTROVERSIAL academy school which saw a bitter battle over its status five years ago has posted the worst GCSE results in Islington and is one of 107 schools nationally to fail to reach minimum government targets.


Quote:
They called on Lord Adonis, the Labour architect of the academy scheme who lives in Islington, to apologise publicly to pupils of the school.


One academy fails, so what? Well, it has an interesting backstory:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islington_Green_School

Quote:
The school controversially failed its Ofsted inspection in 1997. The school had received a respectable 38 per cent pass rate the previous year and despite shortcomings the staff were convinced that the school was not failing. The decision caused the school to "implode". The headteacher under enormous pressure to make visible changes discarded mixed-ability teaching, many teachers decided to leave and the pass rate dropped below 25 per cent.

Ken Muller, a teacher at the school, made a request to Ofsted under the new Freedom of Information Act to see the documents relating to the judgment. Twenty working days later, he got a reply. Most of the documents had been destroyed, said the email, but there was one that might be of interest. Attached was a memo dated November 1997, from HMI Barry Jones to the then chief inspector Chris Woodhead, making clear that the HMI team, of which Jones was a member, had disagreed with Ofsted's judgment, and noting that they were "of the unanimous view that the school was not failing".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:48 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 9:56 pm
Posts: 3720
Location: Gunchester
More 'look at me, look at me!' bollocks from the witless attention-seeker Gove. These 'Trots' he refers to were, in fact, 1,000+ worried parents and members of the local community in Haringey. This way this pompous little shit haughtily dismisses any criticism must surely mean he's due for a spectacular fall somewhere along the line.

Michael Gove labels academy opponents 'Trots'

Quote:
Education Secretary Michael Gove has labelled campaigners against turning a school into an academy as "Trots".

The forthright views of the education secretary were delivered to MPs on the Commons Education Select Committee.

This was at a session in which MPs' questions were informed by 5,000 Twitter messages from the public.

Mr Gove also said he wanted to press ahead with a new performance measure showing the destinations of pupils after leaving school.


Quote:
"It's a pity that the Labour party hasn't spoken out against this Trot campaign," said Mr Gove, prompting the response from the committee that Mr Gove was nothing if not controversial.

_________________
Change does not roll in on the wheels of inevitability, but comes through continuous struggle.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 8:34 pm 
Online

Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 2:07 am
Posts: 3355
Location: chesterfield
Interesting article in the Telegraph which suggests that Gove's beloved academies are leading the way in using vocational courses to boost their position in performance league tables. So attempt to devalue vocational courses could prove a bit of an own goal if academies start falling down the league tables when Gove is trying to make out that they will make a big difference in raising standards.

_________________
www.newshuddlines.blogspot.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 12:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11881
Location: East London
This has been known for yonks. See the TES article I quoted above (in the frenzied rant).

I see mickey mouse courses will be stripped out of league tables in 2015. Shouldn't they have been stripped out of them before we decided academies were wonderful? Or indeed before we appointed Michael Wilshaw to the top job at Ofsted.

I expect this policy to get duly torn to shreds by the Tory-chaired Education Select Committee. Like ebacc

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-14313011


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2803 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 ... 187  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DomWalsh, satnav and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group