It is currently Tue May 21, 2013 5:14 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 77 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Frankie Boyle vs Ofcom
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 11:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:07 am
Posts: 2261
Location: Lancashire
Having decided that no publicity is bad publicity, Channel Four've apparently decided that they're going to work with Boyle to develop a "topical" comedy show.

The only way this feels like it couldn't be a train wreck after Tramadol Nights is if "work with" means keeping a muzzle and a leash on him - but I doubt that Boyle would agree to that.

_________________
"If the past really is a foreign country, I'm surprised that 'The Daily Mail' would want to live there.” - Roger Quimbly


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frankie Boyle vs Ofcom
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 12:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:08 am
Posts: 7326
Samanfur wrote:
Having decided that no publicity is bad publicity, Channel Four've apparently decided that they're going to work with Boyle to develop a "topical" comedy show.

The only way this feels like it couldn't be a train wreck after Tramadol Nights is if "work with" means keeping a muzzle and a leash on him - but I doubt that Boyle would agree to that.


I'd've welcomed a bit more Frankie during the last 2 weeks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frankie Boyle vs Ofcom
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 3:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 1:07 am
Posts: 10144
Location: Fantasy land
Frankie Boyle on MtW with a BBC confident enough to have run the story on that show would have been epic entertainment.

_________________
"Even when you're a super-computer with an IQ of 2000 it's brown trousers time."

Reclaiming "methinks" for the nation

Latest blog post - 2011 - a review (updated 07/10)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frankie Boyle vs Ofcom
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 6:10 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: That fancy London, with it's book learning. Sadly not being anywhere else..
Indeed bluebell, and I must say that although I agree with the general feeling here that Tramadol was mostly bad quality rushed through it seemed to capitalise on his popularity, a new Frankie show at a time like this is sorely missed by many.

Panel shows suit him, I think it could work very well for him (if he's given the chance).

As for comicfight, Davies would crush the lot of them, possibly literaly.

_________________
"Now get those trousers off before someone dies!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frankie Boyle vs Ofcom
PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2011 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 6:10 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: That fancy London, with it's book learning. Sadly not being anywhere else..
Stewart Lee on the other hand would be awful in a fight.

He'd think he'd be great because everyone he knows tells him he would be, but put him up against an even slightly talented opponent, and he'd crumble like a bitch. Then claim he actualy won by his own proper rules but we're all too stupid to see that obviously. Whilst calling other, greater comedians arseholes as he drags his limping carcas from the ring.

_________________
"Now get those trousers off before someone dies!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frankie Boyle vs Ofcom
PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:08 am
Posts: 7326
shyamz wrote:
Stewart Lee on the other hand would be awful in a fight.

He'd think he'd be great because everyone he knows tells him he would be, but put him up against an even slightly talented opponent, and he'd crumble like a bitch. Then claim he actualy won by his own proper rules but we're all too stupid to see that obviously. Whilst calling other, greater comedians arseholes as he drags his limping carcas from the ring.


After that first bout, the audience had developed a taste for blood.
A chant arose in the cheap seats at the back, and spread to the ringside.
The crowd demanded another sacrifice.

Mac-in-tyre, Mac-in-tyre, Mac-in-tyre, Mac-in-tyre, Mac-in-tyre, Mac-in-tyre.

Oblivious to the danger, the next challenger skipped to the ring...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frankie Boyle vs Ofcom
PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2011 2:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 6:10 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: That fancy London, with it's book learning. Sadly not being anywhere else..
...his head bobbing infuriatingly, as if he'd already endured ten rounds of Davies sitting on his skull until his neck snapped, but amazingly he is still yet to take a single hit,

_________________
"Now get those trousers off before someone dies!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frankie Boyle vs Ofcom
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 4:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 3:48 pm
Posts: 75
Frank does seem one miserable unpleasant Jock. But funnily enough that episode was the best by far.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frankie Boyle vs Ofcom
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 3:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:07 am
Posts: 2261
Location: Lancashire
And he's off again.

New book to flog, Frankie? Readership on your newspaper column down? Post-MtW career still not being as fair to your immense, world-beating amazingness as you tell your poor, victimised self it should be?

Still coming across as a tired, hackneyed shock jock who now not only has to be pointlessly offensive to get attention, but can't even think of anything new to be offensive about.

_________________
"If the past really is a foreign country, I'm surprised that 'The Daily Mail' would want to live there.” - Roger Quimbly


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frankie Boyle vs Ofcom
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 7:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:07 am
Posts: 2261
Location: Lancashire
And again.

Quote:
The comedian called the Saudi Arabian team "mainly thieves", referring to criminals having their hands removed.

Apparently, that's "non-discriminatory".

_________________
"If the past really is a foreign country, I'm surprised that 'The Daily Mail' would want to live there.” - Roger Quimbly


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frankie Boyle vs Ofcom
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 7:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:59 am
Posts: 12692
Location: Up my own arse.
I thought that was an okay joke. Sort of on a par with Jimmy Carr's controversial quip a few years back about the UK going to have a brilliant Paralympics team thanks to IEDs in Afghanistan. Actual victims from Aghanistan loved the joke and laughed out loud at the gallows humour, and waddaya know - we do actually have former servicemen who lost limbs in Afghanistan competing as paralympians today.

_________________
I'm a nasty, violent lefty. You cunt.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frankie Boyle vs Ofcom
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 7:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:07 am
Posts: 2261
Location: Lancashire
To me, that seemed more like laughing with them than laughing at them - making lemonade when life gives you lemons, if you will. Carr said himself that he'd picked the joke up from squaddies, and I can believe it. Ultimately, the disabled people get the last laugh in the punchline, even if making a joke about war and war wounds seems off-colour - there's no actual, personal insult there.

Calling the team a bunch of thieves just strikes me as off, even without the disability angle. Lazy, negative, stereotyping. I'd expect that joke from someone more like Jim Davison.

_________________
"If the past really is a foreign country, I'm surprised that 'The Daily Mail' would want to live there.” - Roger Quimbly


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frankie Boyle vs Ofcom
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 8:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:59 am
Posts: 12692
Location: Up my own arse.
Surely the point about the "thieves" reference was to point out that it might be possible for some of the Saudi paralympians to have acquired their disabilities via the penal limb amputations that still pertain in that country under their somewhat savage sharia legal system - obviously exaggerated for comic effect - an all but unique feature of that society. It wasn't having a laugh by calling them thieves, and although something of an (inevitably) negative stereotype, I didn't think it was lazy.

_________________
I'm a nasty, violent lefty. You cunt.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frankie Boyle vs Ofcom
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 9:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:49 pm
Posts: 10443
Location: Durham
Abernathy wrote:
Surely the point about the "thieves" reference was to point out that it might be possible for some of the Saudi paralympians to have acquired their disabilities via the penal limb amputations that still pertain in that country under their somewhat savage sharia legal system - obviously exaggerated for comic effect - an all but unique feature of that society. It wasn't having a laugh by calling them thieves, and although something of an (inevitably) negative stereotype, I didn't think it was lazy.

That's how you and I read it and I'm sure that's what Boyle intended. However the Mailtards see it as bashing the Arabs/Muslims AND being un-pc by mocking the disabled. So, a bit like the Danish Mohammed cartoons, different people appreciate the joke, but for very different reasons. Perhaps Boyle should have anticipated that.

_________________
That subtle admixture of the absurd and the surreally plausible...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frankie Boyle vs Ofcom
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 9:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 22968
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
I liked his joke about the high jumper's personal best being set with Al Qaida assistance. Squaddies would laugh at that.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 77 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group