Why bother being fair to the Mail? It lifted the woman's story — quotes, pictures and all — from the Mirror. Whatever the Mail paid for it (if anything at all), I doubt she'll see a penny. The Mail chose to buy this story, rather than any of the other trash in the red-tops, with the following intentions in mind: getting its readers to scoff at the idea that an average-looking middle-aged woman could have lots of sex; encouraging scepticism about the existence of 'sex addiction' (and, by extension, any other addictive behaviour that's not dependent on external stimuli); and good old-fashioned slut-shaming. Perhaps the woman was stupid to sell her story; the Mail are definitely cunts to run it.

Incidentally, what's with the tabloids' websites lifting articles from each other, and from the rest of the disreputable media (glossy mags, porn mags, E4, etc)? Defenders of the British press are always banging on about how vibrant and competitive it is. Then how come the comics have started copy-pasting each other's stories? Probably the first effect of a proper privacy law would be the closure of half of the national newspapers. I doubt we'd miss them. There are too many, as it is, that follow exactly the same model, publishing exactly the same stories.

I'm getting at the woman actually. She took the "story" to the tabloids for some reason. If the story arouse because the paps had been stalking her, I'dd be the first to condemn the media.

_________________
Sick Left-wing Zealot.

Sex addict Part 2.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1lL0n8S2E

_________________
Sick Left-wing Zealot.

I bet you haven't, Paul.

He has, but they all bore a remarkable resemblance to his hand

_________________
"Even when you're a super-computer with an IQ of 2000 it's brown trousers time."

Reclaiming "methinks" for the nation

Latest blog post - 2011 - a review (updated 07/10)

He may well be working in binary.

(1100 = 9)

Even so, that's probably including the rubber ones.

_________________
Ten seconds... the pain begins.

Fifteen seconds... you can't breathe.

Twenty seconds... you give up and turn off the Jeremy Vine show.

Dunno if this belongs in here. It's about sex on tv.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2112121/Freeview-porn-available-millions-children-bedrooms-prompts-Ofcom-investigation.html

Is this from a so-called member of Mailwatch?

_________________
I accidentally trod on a copy of the Daily Mail. Luckily, I found some dog muck to wipe my shoe on.

12? There are 10 types of people...

_________________
I'd rather shoot Paul Dacre than anyone else in the country- Colin Dexter. A direct quote from the Radio Times m'learned friends

I thought of this the other day when Tebbit was on the radio. He was asked about his views on gay marriage, and his instant answer was that "we must think about the children"!


What fekkin' children?

_________________
"To the living we owe respect, but to the dead we owe only the truth."
Voltaire

Obviously not those brainwashed by the media and religion, nor those abused by 'respected' members of the Church.

_________________
Changin' avatars like there's no tomorrow

The children gay couples would be legally obliged to adopt and subject to a brainwashing program of Will and Grace, Broadway musicals and rigidly choreographed "ramming down throats" obviously...

_________________
"Common Sense is the collection of prejudices aquired by age eighteen" - Albert Einstein

I think what he must've meant is "children of gay people will obviously be relentlessly bullied by small-minded twats like me, therefore they shouldn't be allowed"

_________________
Soppy anti-British, pro-crime, anti-education, pro-immigration, anti-family nonentity