It is currently Sun May 19, 2013 9:58 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 378 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 26  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 5:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 5:40 pm
Posts: 969
Location: London
Mr Mordon wrote:
Killer Whale wrote:
What you're also missing is the instability caused by the Thatcherite introduction of 'flexibility' into the labour market. It's much easier to bring up a contented, healthy family if at least one parent is in long-term, decently-paid, meaningful employment. Working down the mines may have been hell, but the communities that surrounded them were stable, creative and cohesive. There's a thought on the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Cortonwood announcement.


Don't get me wrong, i have simpathy for mining communities. But i do feel that in some cases they made a bit of a rod for their own back with the 'doing the job my father & grandfather did' philosophy. Surely many could see that the coal was not going to last forever, or was to become more and more expensive (and thus inpractical) to extract. Why didn't more of the young people try and broading their scope by staying on at school and going to Uni. Very few jobs are long term these days, you have to broaden your horizons. What Maggie did needed to be done but i agree the way it was done was very wrong.


The coal never actually ran out though did it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 5:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:48 pm
Posts: 189
Location: Bristol
Mr Mordon wrote:
Killer Whale wrote:
What you're also missing is the instability caused by the Thatcherite introduction of 'flexibility' into the labour market. It's much easier to bring up a contented, healthy family if at least one parent is in long-term, decently-paid, meaningful employment. Working down the mines may have been hell, but the communities that surrounded them were stable, creative and cohesive. There's a thought on the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Cortonwood announcement.


Don't get me wrong, i have simpathy for mining communities. But i do feel that in some cases they made a bit of a rod for their own back with the 'doing the job my father & grandfather did' philosophy. Surely many could see that the coal was not going to last forever, or was to become more and more expensive (and thus inpractical) to extract. Why didn't more of the young people try and broading their scope by staying on at school and going to Uni. Very few jobs are long term these days, you have to broaden your horizons. What Maggie did needed to be done but i agree the way it was done was very wrong.



I don't think it was as easy as saying "why didn't they go to Uni". As Killer Whale says, we shifted from a production based society to consumer based in a relatively short period of time. If Britains IT Departments and Recruitment Consultancies were replaced over night with jobs in the building trade (stay with me) would the white-collar worker be as quick to re-adjust?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 6:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 10:12 am
Posts: 4663
Location: Canolbarth Cymru
Mr Mordon wrote:
Killer Whale wrote:
What you're also missing is the instability caused by the Thatcherite introduction of 'flexibility' into the labour market. It's much easier to bring up a contented, healthy family if at least one parent is in long-term, decently-paid, meaningful employment. Working down the mines may have been hell, but the communities that surrounded them were stable, creative and cohesive. There's a thought on the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Cortonwood announcement.


Don't get me wrong, i have simpathy for mining communities. But i do feel that in some cases they made a bit of a rod for their own back with the 'doing the job my father & grandfather did' philosophy. Surely many could see that the coal was not going to last forever, or was to become more and more expensive (and thus inpractical) to extract. Why didn't more of the young people try and broading their scope by staying on at school and going to Uni. Very few jobs are long term these days, you have to broaden your horizons. What Maggie did needed to be done but i agree the way it was done was very wrong.


Well, firstly, many of the mining communities had a great record of aspiration for their young people. One of the reasons that the South Wales coalfield lost its Welsh language was because parents thought that their children would do better educationally and thus not have to work in the mines or ironworks if they spoke English.
In addition the bollocks about coal being uneconomic to extract was a lie. Tower Colliery proved that. The Thatcher government deliberately switched electricity dependency from coal to gas in order to undermine (sorry) the coal industry. We argued at the time that the gas was going to run out far quicker than the coal and so it has proved. Sill we can always get a steady, reliable supply of gas from Russia can't we?
Yes, few jobs are long term these days, and you do have to broaden your horizons, but not everyone can, and those that do face uncertainty and instability, and that's my point.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 6:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:48 pm
Posts: 189
Location: Bristol
office_tramp wrote:
I see what you mean, but I don't think it's as bad as the media make out. Most of us can't afford to live in a throw away culture. Christ, I've got jumpers older than some of you lot!

:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 10:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:33 pm
Posts: 4176
Location: Trostberg, Germany (nice expat)
Killer Whale wrote:
Mr Mordon wrote:
Killer Whale wrote:
What you're also missing is the instability caused by the Thatcherite introduction of 'flexibility' into the labour market. It's much easier to bring up a contented, healthy family if at least one parent is in long-term, decently-paid, meaningful employment. Working down the mines may have been hell, but the communities that surrounded them were stable, creative and cohesive. There's a thought on the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Cortonwood announcement.


Don't get me wrong, i have simpathy for mining communities. But i do feel that in some cases they made a bit of a rod for their own back with the 'doing the job my father & grandfather did' philosophy. Surely many could see that the coal was not going to last forever, or was to become more and more expensive (and thus inpractical) to extract. Why didn't more of the young people try and broading their scope by staying on at school and going to Uni. Very few jobs are long term these days, you have to broaden your horizons. What Maggie did needed to be done but i agree the way it was done was very wrong.


Well, firstly, many of the mining communities had a great record of aspiration for their young people. One of the reasons that the South Wales coalfield lost its Welsh language was because parents thought that their children would do better educationally and thus not have to work in the mines or ironworks if they spoke English.
In addition the bollocks about coal being uneconomic to extract was a lie. Tower Colliery proved that. The Thatcher government deliberately switched electricity dependency from coal to gas in order to undermine (sorry) the coal industry. We argued at the time that the gas was going to run out far quicker than the coal and so it has proved. Sill we can always get a steady, reliable supply of gas from Russia can't we?
Yes, few jobs are long term these days, and you do have to broaden your horizons, but not everyone can, and those that do face uncertainty and instability, and that's my point.


Tower Colliery is one out of a huge number that had to be shut. I'm not saying coal is completly redundant, but the cost of extraction coupled with the increasing evironmental concerns meant it was no longer viable on that scale.

Only today there was an article on the news about the aniversary of the strikes, some bloke was saying how he was glad his son was staying on at school to get a decent education, but still wishes he was going to be working down the mine with his father. Why?? Why are some of these folk so obsessed with living in the past? The days of coal are long since over, get over it.

As for the other point, we wouldn't need to rely on regular gas supplies from russia if the UK bit the bullet and became entirely nuclear powered (like France)

Plus, i agree many do feel uncertainly at this time, but how many riots have you seen so far? I would say that the staff at the banks have just as much right to get angry as they have been completely fucked over by 'middle men' and stock market tossers. What gave the miners the right to attack policemen who were just doing their job?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 10:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 11:40 pm
Posts: 2335
Location: Cardiff
What gave the police the right to attack the miners?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 09, 2009 12:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 11:51 pm
Posts: 1099
Location: Cleethorpes
office_tramp wrote:
The coal never actually ran out though did it?


No it didn't, but where once we had open cast mining (which creates an ugly blot on the landscape but is easy to get at) a lot of our coal supplies now are a lot deeper underground and more challenging to get to. In some cases the only way to get at the coal is via gasification.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:33 pm
Posts: 4176
Location: Trostberg, Germany (nice expat)
tc-obo wrote:
What gave the police the right to attack the miners?


None

other than orders from the govenment. Thats the thing really, it was a case of six of one half a dozen of the other. But rarely does that come across in articles. Plus these were your standard bobbies, not riot police and as such were just as vunerable to physical harm as the miners


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 1:07 am
Posts: 10144
Location: Fantasy land
The strike seems to be one of those things in British history about which there is little middle ground. Virtually everyone you read, speak to or anything is either...

Quote:
"Yes, Thatcher was right, Scargill was a filthy commie hell-bent on bringing down democracy, the miners were all up themselves and taking orders from Moscow, but brave Mrs Thatcher ended their stranglehold on British politics"


...or...

Quote:
"What a bitch Thatcher was, these poor souls only out there to earn a living and she went in callously and turfed them all out of work and then sent in her police cronies to beat them up when they dared fight back, all that nice Mr Scargill wanted was a fair deal and he was brutally treated by Thatcher and her lap-dog press, police and ministers"


...when in reality, both sides had valid points, but those at the top of both movements took things too far.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:59 am
Posts: 12649
Location: Up my own arse.
Quote:
...when in reality, both sides had valid points, but those at the top of both movements took things too far.


You fucking fence-sitter, you. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 7:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 5:40 pm
Posts: 969
Location: London
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1184619/Boil-egg-Thats-hard-say-children.html

This is one of those annoying articles having a go at children for just being children.

Apparently one ought to be able to boil an egg by the age of six.... personally I'm not sure I'd be happy with a 6 year old handling a pan of boiling water though.

They are also basing the story on the incredibly broad age range of 10-16, saying a quarter of 10-16 year olds have never cooked an evening meal. But why the fuck should a 10 year old be cooking the evening meal?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 8:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 10:12 am
Posts: 4663
Location: Canolbarth Cymru
You can well imagine the 'scandal' if the Mail discovered that 10 year olds were routinely cooking family meals. What a fantastic opportunity to attack working women!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 5:09 am
Posts: 766
Blimey, If my parents had let me make my own evening meals at 10 I would have been living almost exclusively on a diet of Peanut Butter sandwiches and Ice Cream.

There's a good reason my mum cooked for us!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 9:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:39 pm
Posts: 5969
Location: That London
Since when has being able to boil an egg at age 6 been a measure of proper childhood development? Even my Dad didn't boil things when he was 6 and he grew up in the 30s when people were a lot more lax about these things. I normally associate small children cooking meals etc with Victorian slum life, not 21st century Britain. Mind you, cue the comments about how various readers had to boil eggs/clean toilets/work in t'mill etc when they were lads and lasses/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 10:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 4:07 pm
Posts: 3242
I thought only girls should know: boys are supposed to be learning the ropes from Father.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 378 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 26  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group