It is currently Tue May 21, 2013 2:43 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 293 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 20  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs David Cameron
PostPosted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 9:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:05 pm
Posts: 64
Malcolm Armsteen wrote:
Ah. THAT sort of logic...

I'm a bit bored by that - I've been babysitting all afternoon. Don't want to carry on through the evening.


yes.
Little minds do bore easily.
Don't worry


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs David Cameron
PostPosted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 9:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 22968
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
Actually, young minds don't bore easily, unless they are in some way damaged. Older minds get fed up with prattish behaviour.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs David Cameron
PostPosted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 9:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:05 pm
Posts: 64
Malcolm Armsteen wrote:
Actually, young minds don't bore easily, unless they are in some way damaged. Older minds get fed up with prattish behaviour.


I said little......not young.
You must like proving my point!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs David Cameron
PostPosted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 9:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 22968
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
I didn't think you'd understand...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs David Cameron
PostPosted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 3:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 11:09 am
Posts: 2417
Location: Redhill, Surrey
Ignoring the paedofinder general, the first person to make a claim has the responsibility to back up that claim with evidence, in this case that would be Mailydail....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs David Cameron
PostPosted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 10:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:21 pm
Posts: 3800
Location: Magic Swirling Ship
lord_kobel wrote:
Ignoring the paedofinder general, the first person to make a claim has the responsibility to back up that claim with evidence, in this case that would be Mailydail....


On the Suri Cruise thread, you mean? That was DailyMailHater wasn't it :? ? Very easy to get the two names mixed up though, as they are quite similar. (Just remembered when I was lurking on another forum a while ago for a bit and two posters were multi-posting under different user names causing a kerfuffle. Not that I'm saying this is happening here, I hasten to add, perish the thought :| ).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs David Cameron
PostPosted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 10:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 22968
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
That would be a terrible thing to do.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs David Cameron
PostPosted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 11:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:21 pm
Posts: 3800
Location: Magic Swirling Ship
I know. Shocking. I'm wondering if that thing that I'm saying (in my above post) which almost certainly isn't happening, hasten to add, perish the thought etc etc has crossed anyone else's mind? I infer from occasional recent posts that it has (but obviously without evidence, one cannot name names directly).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs David Cameron
PostPosted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 11:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 22968
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
Heaven forfend!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs David Cameron
PostPosted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 1:10 pm 
As I said in another thread, this forum will log the IP addresses of all its members. Get an administrator to see if any IPs have multiple accounts...


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs David Cameron
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 8:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:39 pm
Posts: 5978
Location: That London
Wasn't sure where to put this and couldn't find the 'Vs. the Coalition' thread (although I wasn't looking very hard - mods, feel free to move this)...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -cuts.html

Yes, the Mail slags off the government for their 'Spending Challenge' website where ordinary people and morons can post their ideas for what should be changed. Thus making its readers aware that they can go and vote for kicking immigrants out of cities, bringing back the workhouse etc while also getting all sanctimonious about what awful ideas the public have and what idiots the goverment are for thinking of this in the first place. My head hurts.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs David Cameron
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 8:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 1:07 am
Posts: 10144
Location: Fantasy land
Not to mention then allows the readers to come up with their own ideas on the comments section...

_________________
"Even when you're a super-computer with an IQ of 2000 it's brown trousers time."

Reclaiming "methinks" for the nation

Latest blog post - 2011 - a review (updated 07/10)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs David Cameron
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 11:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 4:52 pm
Posts: 2552
Location: Dirty XBerg 36
What a fine evening's entertainment that waste of bandwidth has turned out to be...except it's now broken. Hmm

_________________
Brigate di Transizione


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs David Cameron
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 8:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:39 pm
Posts: 5978
Location: That London
I was wondering if the Mail would print this, and amazingly they have! Mind you, The War trumps their love for Cameron every time, plus what he said was admittedly a fucking egregious slip-up to say the least.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -1940.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs David Cameron
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:21 pm
Posts: 3800
Location: Magic Swirling Ship
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... agers.html

Quote:
Here we go again another numpty idea. Bet the pregnancy rate goes up. 16 year olds already have their hormones in full swing so put them all together for six weeks and baby boom time nine months later. Result, more on benefits, more expense for the tax payer. Who in their right mind wants to keep an eye on 16 year old kids sneaking off for drinkies, smokies and sex. The children of the new millenium are not boy scouts or girl guides. Sorry to those kids that are well behaved but the ones in this area of Devon prefer to get off their faces, fornicate and fight.
- eve, exeter devon, 22/7/2010 08:47


:lol: Over-reacting much? What's she like when it's raining out? "Oh no! There might be floods and we'll all drown!!!"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 293 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 20  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group