The Mail vs David Cameron

DailyMailHater · **Joined:** Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:05 pm **Posts:** 64

Malcolm Armsteen wrote:

Ah. THAT sort of logic...

I'm a bit bored by that - I've been babysitting all afternoon. Don't want to carry on through the evening.

yes.
Little minds do bore easily.
Don't worry

Malcolm Armsteen · **Posted:** Fri Jun 25, 2010 9:14 pm

Actually, young minds don't bore easily, unless they are in some way damaged. Older minds get fed up with prattish behaviour.

DailyMailHater · **Joined:** Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:05 pm **Posts:** 64

Malcolm Armsteen wrote:

Actually, young minds don't bore easily, unless they are in some way damaged. Older minds get fed up with prattish behaviour.

I said little......not young.
You must like proving my point!!

Malcolm Armsteen · **Posted:** Fri Jun 25, 2010 9:26 pm

I didn't think you'd understand...

lord_kobel · **Posted:** Sat Jun 26, 2010 3:55 am

Ignoring the paedofinder general, the first person to make a claim has the responsibility to back up that claim with evidence, in this case that would be Mailydail....

AOB · **Posted:** Sat Jun 26, 2010 10:40 am

lord_kobel wrote:

Ignoring the paedofinder general, the first person to make a claim has the responsibility to back up that claim with evidence, in this case that would be Mailydail....

On the Suri Cruise thread, you mean? That was DailyMailHater wasn't it

? Very easy to get the two names mixed up though, as they are quite similar. (Just remembered when I was lurking on another forum a while ago for a bit and two posters were multi-posting under different user names causing a kerfuffle. Not that I'm saying this is happening here, I hasten to add, perish the thought

).

Malcolm Armsteen · **Posted:** Sat Jun 26, 2010 10:52 am

That would be a terrible thing to do.

AOB · **Posted:** Sat Jun 26, 2010 11:05 am

I know. Shocking. I'm wondering if that thing that I'm saying (in my above post) which almost certainly isn't happening, hasten to add, perish the thought etc etc has crossed anyone else's mind? I infer from occasional recent posts that it has (but obviously without evidence, one cannot name names directly).

Malcolm Armsteen · **Posted:** Sat Jun 26, 2010 11:13 am

Heaven forfend!

Mailydail · **Posted:** Sat Jun 26, 2010 1:10 pm

As I said in another thread, this forum will log the IP addresses of all its members. Get an administrator to see if any IPs have multiple accounts...

Fflaps · **Posted:** Tue Jul 13, 2010 8:01 pm

Wasn't sure where to put this and couldn't find the 'Vs. the Coalition' thread (although I wasn't looking very hard - mods, feel free to move this)...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -cuts.html

Yes, the Mail slags off the government for their 'Spending Challenge' website where ordinary people and morons can post their ideas for what should be changed. Thus making its readers aware that they can go and vote for kicking immigrants out of cities, bringing back the workhouse etc while also getting all sanctimonious about what awful ideas the public have and what idiots the goverment are for thinking of this in the first place. My head hurts.

bluebellnutter · **Posted:** Tue Jul 13, 2010 8:51 pm

Not to mention then allows the readers to come up with their own ideas on the comments section...

Kreuzberger · **Posted:** Tue Jul 13, 2010 11:17 pm

What a fine evening's entertainment that waste of bandwidth has turned out to be...except it's now broken. Hmm

Fflaps · **Posted:** Thu Jul 22, 2010 8:29 am

I was wondering if the Mail would print this, and amazingly they have! Mind you, The War trumps their love for Cameron every time, plus what he said was admittedly a fucking egregious slip-up to say the least.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -1940.html

AOB · **Posted:** Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:18 am

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... agers.html

Quote:

Here we go again another numpty idea. Bet the pregnancy rate goes up. 16 year olds already have their hormones in full swing so put them all together for six weeks and baby boom time nine months later. Result, more on benefits, more expense for the tax payer. Who in their right mind wants to keep an eye on 16 year old kids sneaking off for drinkies, smokies and sex. The children of the new millenium are not boy scouts or girl guides. Sorry to those kids that are well behaved but the ones in this area of Devon prefer to get off their faces, fornicate and fight.
- eve, exeter devon, 22/7/2010 08:47

Over-reacting much? What's she like when it's raining out? "Oh no! There might be floods and we'll all drown!!!"

The Mail vs David Cameron

Who is online