Cannabis addiction soars as drug gets stronger
This was front page of the Independent too yesterday.
Daily Mail wrote:
Research published this week in the Lancet will show skunk is more addictive - and socially dangerous - than Class A drugs such as LSD and ecstasy.
What about comparing it to drugs actually considered addictive? The more dangerous claim was in the Independent too
Daily Mail wrote:
Experts say the skunk smoked by youngsters today is very different to the cannabis resin of ten years ago.
It has 25 times the level of the main psychoactive ingredient, tetrahydrocannabidinol, and is sold at a third of the price.
Excuse my language but this is bullshit. The strongest skunk you can buy today is between 20-25% THC, a lot of it is around 10%. Good hash, like Howard Marks used to import is up to 30% THC. Soapbar hash, common ten years ago, is poor quality but it is cut with (sometimes literally) shit, glue, plastic and God knows what else far more unhealthy than actual cannabis.
The 'third of the price' claim is baffling. The Independent says
Independent wrote:
Cannabis now sells for £43 per ounce on average, a big drop from the 1994 average price of £120 per ounce.
'Skunk' hasn't dropped this dramatically in price, and is nearer to the quoted 1994 price (in my experience). Soapbar hash has dropped in this time by a great amount - demand has fallen as people realise they were smoking rubbish. Good hash remains expensive.
Independent article:
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/health ... 369014.ece