It is currently Sat May 25, 2013 5:15 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 569 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 38  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 11:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:07 pm
Posts: 437
Location: Alpha Centauri
Le Petomane wrote:
Poe's Law?


It isn't Edgar Allen Poes law on poem length, but a internet forum "law" coined by Nathan Poe stating vis a vis creationist comments that:-

“Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humour, it is impossible to create a parody of fundamentalism that someone won't mistake for the real thing.”

Essentially some - fundy comments (can exceed just creationism, but most are found on that topic.) are so fucked up, any attempt to seperate fakes from the real thing is difficult - to say the least.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 11:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 23088
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
I think that he was suggesting that Poe's Law should be applied, not asking what it was...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 11:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:07 pm
Posts: 437
Location: Alpha Centauri
Ooops :oops:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 1:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 10:37 am
Posts: 426
Wakefield struck off.

The comments are predictably depressing:

Quote:
This man drew attention to possible links to autism - that's all.
- Peter, York, 24/5/2010 11:10


No, Peter of York, that's not all. :roll:

Though I hadn't come across this brilliant argument before:

Quote:
It is not normal to become infected
With these three diseases at the
Same time, so it is possible that the
MMR doesn't help !


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 2:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 23088
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
I think that adequately sums up the general level of intelligence of Mailies...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 4:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 10:19 am
Posts: 26
Quote:
It is not normal to become infected
With these three diseases at the
Same time, so it is possible that the
MMR doesn't help !


That's the worst poem I've ever read. 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 4:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 1:07 am
Posts: 10144
Location: Fantasy land
Was it written by Edgar Allen Poe (he says pseudo-satirically)

_________________
"Even when you're a super-computer with an IQ of 2000 it's brown trousers time."

Reclaiming "methinks" for the nation

Latest blog post - 2011 - a review (updated 07/10)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 7:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 2:51 pm
Posts: 1439
The Darwin Awards spring to mind. Apparently we'll all be sorrreeeeeeeeeeeeeee in 20 years that we didn't believe St Andrew Wakefield.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 9:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:59 am
Posts: 12757
Location: Up my own arse.
Nice Comic Strip version of the MMR shit here.

_________________
I'm a nasty, violent lefty. You cunt.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 11:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 2:58 pm
Posts: 1308
Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire
I've shown the comic strip to everyone I can since you posted it - absolutely superb work. Funny I trust a comic more than most newspapers!

_________________
"To the living we owe respect, but to the dead we owe only the truth."
Voltaire


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 4:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 1:07 am
Posts: 10144
Location: Fantasy land
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldne ... dying.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/artic ... tment.html

Two stories of older mothers. Choice comments...

Quote:
Congratulations to her, I say. She looks extremely happy in that photo and the children appear to be healthy bundles of fun too. What an lovely uplifting story, it's made my day!

- Goosey, Lincs, 15/6/2010 13:32
Click to rate Rating 124


Quote:
I guess none of you know what it is like to be childless in a county where it is very important to have a child. That is Indian culture. If you don't have a child you are not thought much of, especially true if you are uneducated and have never had a good job.

Things are different in Britain and the rest of the west.
Think yourself lucky that you are not pressured to have a family, but can pick and choose.
Just don't sneer when a lady in another country chooses to have a child. She desperately wanted just one, not a lot, just one. Poor woman. Hopefully the extended family will bring the child up.

- Annette, Sidmouth, 14/6/2010 17:42
Click to rate Rating 278


Those two are the worst rated, personally can't see anything wrong with them. So you can probably guess exactly where this is going...

Quote:
Following on from the story of the 70 year old Indian IVF mother who is dying 18 months after giving birth, this should not be allowed. Children have a right to have parents.

- S Rogers, Rochester, UK, 14/6/2010 16:49
Click to rate Rating 776


So children who will lose their parents should never be allowed to be born. Logic even Hitler could approve of. I can't even be bothered looking at the others, it's too depressing.

_________________
"Even when you're a super-computer with an IQ of 2000 it's brown trousers time."

Reclaiming "methinks" for the nation

Latest blog post - 2011 - a review (updated 07/10)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 2:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 5:05 pm
Posts: 2466
Location: hove
PM defies 'experts' who insist babies don't feel pain at 24 weeks

oh brave cameron, doesn't look like theres going to be any change in the goverments respect for it's own expert panels if they fail to come up with the "correct" results.

_________________
i have an art blog: http://procrastinationathon.blogspot.com/
and a review blog: http://blindwithwoodenhands.blogspot.com/
double blog! what does it mean?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 3:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 4:07 pm
Posts: 3254
Scientists say FA LA LA NOT LISTENING NOT LISTENING

That news about pain et al is largely irrelevant: abortion is not argued along scientific grounds.

_________________
http://redsparrows.tumblr.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 5:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:59 pm
Posts: 2756
Location: N Wales Compound, EUKSSR
Nice to see evidence-based policy was another thing my Lib Dem vote was sold down the river on.

_________________
Soppy anti-British, pro-crime, anti-education, pro-immigration, anti-family nonentity


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 5:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 23088
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
Yup.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 569 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 38  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group