It is currently Thu May 23, 2013 7:59 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 569 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 34, 35, 36, 37, 38  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 11:04 pm
Posts: 711
ACG wrote:
Malcolm Armsteen wrote:
And there always has to be
A canadian numpty wrote:
If all the energy and money that went into this discovery was spent on coming up with the cure for cancer, I would be truly impressed.
- Mary, Scarborough, Ontario, Canada


considering one of the offshoots of the equipment which was originally developed for CERN and their experiments is the mri machine, they've actually done quite a bit to help with cancer treatment mary.


No no no you don't get it, if all scientists just got into a room together with some beakers of bubbling sollution they'd have cancer licked in a day.

Much in the same manner that some people don't appreciate that numerous topics can be considered by parliament at the same time (press ethics AND the economy!!), the same selfish bastards think that their interests are the only thing that matters. As though, if we cured cancer, we wouldn't have the same patients dying of dementia or heart failure or renal failure or <Whatever> failure a few years later.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 9:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 1:42 pm
Posts: 1626
I followed this link expecting the worst but credit where it is due, paragraph 19 appearing as a first subheading... they can do it when they want to.


Alzheimer's jab that can stop patients developing symptoms for three years under development


Drug is still in the very early stages of development
Further tests on patients could take several years


All above the byline.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/artic ... z20ugzQ3lM

_________________
I'd rather shoot Paul Dacre than anyone else in the country- Colin Dexter. A direct quote from the Radio Times m'learned friends


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:39 pm
Posts: 5999
Location: That London
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... years.html

Just for the comments. I feel like bashing my head against a wall till my brains fall out so I can actually read them without crying.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:00 am
Posts: 6730
Location: Time Vortex
Quote:
Can someone please explain why the yanks have only ever been to the moon once? If there such a great nation why have they not gone back to find out more about the planet? Not convinced by all of this!! Pity we can't have google moon!! That would put this story to rest!!
- scott, stotfold, 29/7/2012 23:07
Click to rate Rating 168

Money. Politics. But there's no point in telling Scott that. We aren't that used to technology going backwards. At present the US has no manned spaceflight capacity. I can understand why some people find it hard to believe that it happened.
Back in 1972, I certainly never imagined that forty years later, I'd be wondering if I'd live to see us venturing beyond Earth orbit again.

_________________
Sick Left-wing Zealot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 5:59 pm
Posts: 5504
Location: London
Plus they didn't only go once - they went seven times in all, didn't they?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 10:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:00 am
Posts: 6730
Location: Time Vortex
Six landings, and three missions that "only" went round the Moon.
Apollo 8 that orbited without a lunar module.
Apollo 10 that involved flying the lunar module without landing.
Apollo 13 that nearly didn't return.

_________________
Sick Left-wing Zealot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2012 3:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:00 am
Posts: 6730
Location: Time Vortex
Quote:
The woman who wants to abolish sex: Genetics expert urges us to embrace a future of virgin births (for women AND men) in which sex and marriage are redundant

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... z23uHClTO5
An expert who seems unaware of the latest research in her field.
Quote:
She warns that the Y chromosome — the strand of DNA which helps shape the male of any species — is ‘hurtling down the evolutionary road towards extinction’. Research has shown that the genetic information contained on it has been disintegrating over time.

Er, no.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/scie ... tists.html
Quote:
Fears that the male Y chromosome could be wiped out within five million years have been undermined by new research showing the drop in genes has stabilised.

_________________
Sick Left-wing Zealot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:59 pm
Posts: 783
Location: Ted
The Daily Mail enters the brave new world of dinosaur pornography, has collar felt my Cracked.com.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... -long.html
http://www.cracked.com/blog/why-journal ... osaur-sex/

Not content with papping the living or inventing blatant untruths about things that directly affect modern man, the Mail decides a solid way to get hits is to tell punters exactly how dinosaurs went about warming that cold blood (with pictures!)

Image

Predictably enough, the information turns out to be wrong (no-one knows how big a T-Rex's chap was) and a rehash of a story the Mail published a few months previously. Why this was even presented as news is a mystery since the study of dinosaur mating habits is very much in it's infancy and almost entirely based upon observing how the heavier animals of today go about their business. It's pretty much accepted that due to their size, weight and shape, large reptiles like T-Rex have a fairly limited set of options when it comes to mating positions. It's not like someone's meticulously worked their way through the Karma Sutra crossing off the tricky ones and then got straight on the phone to Reuters.

Then again, you should never underestimate the Mail's grim fascination with any kind of sex that deviates from the accepted standard (5 minutes of missionary executed with the cold methodical detachment of a war criminal), and apparently dinosaur filth is still very much the kind of filth we like.

Below is just one of the best pictures available to the discerning gentleman with a penchant for the mature, many more are available via the links provided.

Image

Quote:
If your job as a science illustrator is to show people what it looked like when dinosaurs had sex, then your job stops at positioning. You don't include clearly humanoid facial expressions of orgasmic ecstasy for science, you do that for your own agenda.

_________________
"Common Sense is the collection of prejudices aquired by age eighteen" - Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 4:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:00 am
Posts: 6730
Location: Time Vortex
Quote:
Melting permafrost 'will DOUBLE carbon and nitrogen levels in the atmosphere': Experts issue chilling new climate change warning


78% to 156%. That's serious.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... z2DLMgXUFV

_________________
Sick Left-wing Zealot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 3:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 1:30 am
Posts: 5233
Location: Hearing Banjo Music...
Image


There was a show on US Animal Planet that claimed government is suppressing evidence of the existence of dragons.

They claimed to find a frozen carcass that was then examined by scientists.

Then they went back to the Cretaceous where a T Rex walked in on an unsuspecting Dragon (all very 'Walking with Dinosaurs' minus the science) and they had a fight. The fight was won when the Dragon eventually decided to breathe fire on the T Rex. The T Rex walked away with a smoking head and apparently died later.

Apparently the Dragons could fly by breaking down food in their gut and producing hydrogen as a byproduct, which then went to fill their 'flight bladders' so they could fly.

All very informative, in a unique way......

_________________
You may say I'm a dreamer.... but I'm not the only one....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 4:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 11:04 pm
Posts: 711
Big Rob wrote:
Apparently the Dragons could fly by breaking down food in their gut and producing hydrogen as a byproduct, which then went to fill their 'flight bladders' so they could fly.

All very informative, in a unique way......


Pfft, that was from Flight of the Dragons. What is it with conspiracists and stealing their plot hooks from popular media? (cf David Icke and the TV series V)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 1:30 am
Posts: 5233
Location: Hearing Banjo Music...
Winegums wrote:
Pfft, that was from Flight of the Dragons. What is it with conspiracists and stealing their plot hooks from popular media? (cf David Icke and the TV series V)


I found the show....



_________________
You may say I'm a dreamer.... but I'm not the only one....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:00 am
Posts: 6730
Location: Time Vortex
Quote:
'Bigfoot is a direct relative of man and had sex with human females 15,000 years ago': Geneticist claims to have DNA evidence of mythic North American beast

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z2DVvNnCHB
What exactly is a direct relative?
Quote:
and concludes that the legendary Sasquatch is a missing link that arose approximately 15,000 years ago.

A missing link to what?
If they exist, the pictures don't suggest a species that can interbreed with us.

_________________
Sick Left-wing Zealot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 8:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 6:43 am
Posts: 1853
Location: Dorset
Whilst a nice human interest story (she does have a book to sell) this is a rather irresponsible headline considering she still has the cancer and isn't a technically a survivor'. She is doing her best to live with her present condition.

Image

Quote:
Instead, Kris decided to find her own way to manage her condition, through a combination of a plant-based diet and nontraditional medicine. Just as she does not claim that her former fast-living ways caused her cancer, nor does she believe that green juice, yoga and pH-conscious foods will cure it. But she did have the power to radically improve her overall health, which might just work wonders.

‘The drugs they could offer me weren’t going to cure me, and I felt, why take away my quality of life if you can’t take away my disease?’

Next Valentine’s Day, it will be ten years since Kris first heard the words, ‘You have cancer.’ She is not cancer-free; her tumours remain, and she has annual scans to monitor their growth, or otherwise. Fortunately, her cancer, the specialists discovered, is the slow-growing rather than the aggressive sort.

But as the self-ascribed ‘poster girl for cancer’, Kris is a powerful advert for her own alternative approach – she is glowing and vital and looks at least a decade younger than her 41 years. ‘I’ve not only been surviving, I’ve been thriving – with cancer,’ she agrees. ‘I actually feel better with the disease than I did without it.’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/you/art ... vivor.html
Quote:
Epithelioid haemangioendothelioma isn't a malignant cancer-its an intermediate type of growth. Patients have survived many decades with this tumour as it is extremely slow growing. Whilst it can affect different organs, it doesn't form metastatic tumours like real cancers do. A healthy diet with plentiful vegetables and fruit is recommended for everyone, but to claim that her diet has stopped the tumour is irresponsible and false.

- christina20, Belfast, 16/12/2012 12:55 393

_________________
My blog: https://stevenplrose.wordpress.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs Science!
PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 8:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:00 am
Posts: 6730
Location: Time Vortex
Quote:
Adam Smith, New York, United States,.... ""Vegan" comes from an old Native American word meaning poor hunter."... It does nothing of the kind....It is derived from the Latin derivative "veg" from the latin word of vegetatio meaning "Whole" and/or "Growing". With further words with the same derivative such as: vegetable and vegetation. I wonder where people get these completely baseless idea.
- Resident, somewhere in America, 16/12/2012 16:41

_________________
Sick Left-wing Zealot.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 569 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 34, 35, 36, 37, 38  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group