You know how it is, that Kimberley out of Girls Aloud. No not her, that's Cheryl, the northern one. Yes, her. Cor, ain't she fat...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... tears.html

For those who don't know her, this is Kimberley Walsh.



What a porker, eh? Well apparently so...







This would be that well known Sky One show "This Morning", which ITV obviously steal.







Good to see John Terry taking a much needed break from World Cup training there.





And while we're on the subject, James Anderson gets some rest before an ODI against Scotland this weekend.



So there you go. Kimberley is a lard arse apparently. Funny they never make these comments about Anne Widdicombe, isn't it?

_________________
"Even when you're a super-computer with an IQ of 2000 it's brown trousers time."

Reclaiming "methinks" for the nation

Latest blog post - 2011 - a review (updated 07/10)

photograph anyone from that angle and they'll have a double chin.

And for take two...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... -joke.html

This is a "plus size model".



And these are cunts.







Because in Amy's world the only thing that makes you unhealthy is a bit of fat. Which is presumably why African famine victims live forever...oh no wait, that's not right, is it.





Yes, he seems a thoroughly charming man he does.





So yes, all you women, make sure you don't become chunkers or people will become physically sick when they walk near you. Or something. Sorry, I was too busy looking at the plus sized models bosoms to notice...

_________________
"Even when you're a super-computer with an IQ of 2000 it's brown trousers time."

Reclaiming "methinks" for the nation

Latest blog post - 2011 - a review (updated 07/10)

Ye gods, what an absolute bunch of cunts! I take it they all think Nigella Lawson is morbidly obese and can only get around with the use of a crane. And again with this idea that only other "fat" women would disagree with calling her fat- most of my male friends would love to have the sexy time with Nigella, and actually find Kimberly and the other GA members too thin! To quote my mate John

_________________
Please note: this badger is up to date with her vaccinations. She did not give your cows TB, and as such anyone attempting to kill her will be tied to a chair naked, covered in jam and positioned over a nest of very angry ants.

Jesus. I should be so lucky as to look like either of them. And I'm a size 10/12 so apparently massively obese by those cunts' standards.

Edit: and how many of the male commenters above would stand any chance with either of those women, I wonder...?

_________________
Where there is great doubt, there will be great awakening; small doubt, small awakening, no doubt, no awakening.

_________________
"As a horror writer I don't ask for much. I just hope I've changed the way you think about life."

At size 14 I'm probably morbidly obese by their standards. I'm literally not able to get down to size 10. Even at 7st 8 after a near breakdown (not only fat but shamelessly weak and attention seeking too ) and looking really ill to the point that people were gossiping that I had anorexia, (I didn't btw) I took a 12 because I genuinely am big boned which in mail land is a euphemism for fat and lazy. Some of the posters do not accept that not all women are tiny and small framed just because they are or wish they were or think their Mrs should be.

_________________
The public have an insatiable curiosity to know everything, except what is worth knowing. Journalism, conscious of this, and having tradesman-like habits, supplies their demands - OSCAR WILDE, The Soul of Man Under Socialism

Seriously, WTF? These sort of stories do my head in.

Actually heres a true story. At work one of the people I work with is a woman, a few years younger than me. She keeps making comments about how she is fat, how she needs to lose weight, etc etc. Alright she might be a very teeny tiny bit overweight.. but she certainly isn't "fat". I certainly can't help but think its stories like those in media that are making her think that she is fat, when truthfully she isn't.

I mostly wear a size 16, but I have a couple of pairs of size 18 jeans. I am a vast ocean of fat. I also have big feet, broad shoulders and a broad ribcage, and might be able to get down to a size 10 if I gave up food entirely, but I'm not about to do that (I'm eating salad right now - fatty!)

Also, Kimberly Walsh has what is obviously a muscular stomach there - and I can't see where here jeans "don't fit" either. These comments seem to be divided between (a)ridiculous man-children that haven't the faintest idea about human anatomy and (b)women who are probably terribly insecure about their own looks. Mostly the former.

if these designers are so great, why do they need size 0 models to make their clothes look good?

_________________
"Stop making up quotes and attributing them to me" - Voltaire

most designers are gay, maybe that's got something to do with it

I forget where I read this, but I once read an article where some anonymous designer said if coathangers could walk they'd send them down the catwalk instead. It's all about the clothes and the fewer lumps and bumps the better. Despite the fact they are worn by actual people. Interestingly, a size 12 dress by for example Marc Jacobs is much bigger than a size 12 one from Topshop, so perhaps designers are actually aware (when making the stuff for actual sale) that the women who buy them tend to be better off, therefore a bit older and therefore likely to be a bit bigger. And yeah, as Moonshien says, most designers are gay (or female), so don't see models in a sexual way. Though you do get a very few who like curves, ie Vivienne Westwood, Versace (before he was murdered), Herve Leger, Dolce & Gabbana and, er, that's about all I can think of at the moment.

I tried on a pair of J Brand (pricey) jeans last week and was 3 sizes smaller than the equivalent in Topshop. Mind you it could just be flattering the women who buy their clothes into thinking they're a smaller size than they really are. Which takes us back to why on earth is it desirable to be as skinny as possible? I know that in the past in our own culture and in present day ones where rich food was/is at a premium it's more desirable to be larger, and until the late 20s it was fashionable to be pale to show you didn't work outdoors (and it still is in some parts of the world - and now with the prevalence of fake tan, the tide is turning again). So maybe now being really really skinny is seen as a sign that you have the leisure to diet and the money to choose what you eat to remain thin?

The Duchess of Windsor famously said you can't be too rich or too thin. You only have to look at photos of her to see that the latter isn't true.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... inner.html

And probably a contender for cunt of the week we have...









Is this a cry for help?

The following are included not for the content but the ratings...

_________________
"Even when you're a super-computer with an IQ of 2000 it's brown trousers time."

Reclaiming "methinks" for the nation

Latest blog post - 2011 - a review (updated 07/10)